Explaining youth custody in Scotland: the new crisis of containment and convergence

Monica Barry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Custody in its broadest sense means safe-keeping, guarding and containment, the inference being that the individual offender is to be protected. However, in the UK, as elsewhere, custody now has wider political and public protection connotations. In England and Wales, the focus of youth custody is on public protection through punishment and offender management. In Scotland, the focus has traditionally been on offender protection, through addressing the young person's broader welfare needs, but recent trends and drivers in youth custody rates in Scotland now paint a different picture (Barry forthcoming; McAra and McVie 2010). This article describes the different approach taken in Scotland compared with England and Wales, at least up until recently, regarding the custody and care of children and young people who offend. The article identifies four key drivers to expanding youth custody rates in Scotland: (i) the earlier criminalisation of children and young people; (ii) increasingly stringent requirements imposed on children and young people who offend; (iii) the increased use of remand; and (iv) the use of shorter prison sentences with little scope for rehabilitation. The article concludes that these drivers are themselves driven by the politicisation of youth crime in Scotland and the abandonment of traditional Scottish values of minimal intervention and the paramountcy of the child's best interests.
LanguageEnglish
Pages153-170
Number of pages18
JournalThe Howard Journal of Crime and Justice
Volume50
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2011

Fingerprint

child custody
offender
driver
criminalization
politicization
imprisonment
rehabilitation
penalty
welfare
offense
human being
trend
management
Values

Keywords

  • youth custody
  • sentencing in Scotland
  • youth justice
  • Children's Hearings
  • young people
  • criminalisation
  • custody

Cite this

@article{62d145ff0b8a46d2809472ae2c1fd328,
title = "Explaining youth custody in Scotland: the new crisis of containment and convergence",
abstract = "Custody in its broadest sense means safe-keeping, guarding and containment, the inference being that the individual offender is to be protected. However, in the UK, as elsewhere, custody now has wider political and public protection connotations. In England and Wales, the focus of youth custody is on public protection through punishment and offender management. In Scotland, the focus has traditionally been on offender protection, through addressing the young person's broader welfare needs, but recent trends and drivers in youth custody rates in Scotland now paint a different picture (Barry forthcoming; McAra and McVie 2010). This article describes the different approach taken in Scotland compared with England and Wales, at least up until recently, regarding the custody and care of children and young people who offend. The article identifies four key drivers to expanding youth custody rates in Scotland: (i) the earlier criminalisation of children and young people; (ii) increasingly stringent requirements imposed on children and young people who offend; (iii) the increased use of remand; and (iv) the use of shorter prison sentences with little scope for rehabilitation. The article concludes that these drivers are themselves driven by the politicisation of youth crime in Scotland and the abandonment of traditional Scottish values of minimal intervention and the paramountcy of the child's best interests.",
keywords = "youth custody, sentencing in Scotland, youth justice, Children's Hearings, young people , criminalisation, custody",
author = "Monica Barry",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2311.2010.00656.x",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "153--170",
journal = "The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice",
issn = "0265-5527",
number = "2",

}

Explaining youth custody in Scotland : the new crisis of containment and convergence. / Barry, Monica.

In: The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, Vol. 50, No. 2, 05.2011, p. 153-170.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explaining youth custody in Scotland

T2 - The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice

AU - Barry, Monica

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - Custody in its broadest sense means safe-keeping, guarding and containment, the inference being that the individual offender is to be protected. However, in the UK, as elsewhere, custody now has wider political and public protection connotations. In England and Wales, the focus of youth custody is on public protection through punishment and offender management. In Scotland, the focus has traditionally been on offender protection, through addressing the young person's broader welfare needs, but recent trends and drivers in youth custody rates in Scotland now paint a different picture (Barry forthcoming; McAra and McVie 2010). This article describes the different approach taken in Scotland compared with England and Wales, at least up until recently, regarding the custody and care of children and young people who offend. The article identifies four key drivers to expanding youth custody rates in Scotland: (i) the earlier criminalisation of children and young people; (ii) increasingly stringent requirements imposed on children and young people who offend; (iii) the increased use of remand; and (iv) the use of shorter prison sentences with little scope for rehabilitation. The article concludes that these drivers are themselves driven by the politicisation of youth crime in Scotland and the abandonment of traditional Scottish values of minimal intervention and the paramountcy of the child's best interests.

AB - Custody in its broadest sense means safe-keeping, guarding and containment, the inference being that the individual offender is to be protected. However, in the UK, as elsewhere, custody now has wider political and public protection connotations. In England and Wales, the focus of youth custody is on public protection through punishment and offender management. In Scotland, the focus has traditionally been on offender protection, through addressing the young person's broader welfare needs, but recent trends and drivers in youth custody rates in Scotland now paint a different picture (Barry forthcoming; McAra and McVie 2010). This article describes the different approach taken in Scotland compared with England and Wales, at least up until recently, regarding the custody and care of children and young people who offend. The article identifies four key drivers to expanding youth custody rates in Scotland: (i) the earlier criminalisation of children and young people; (ii) increasingly stringent requirements imposed on children and young people who offend; (iii) the increased use of remand; and (iv) the use of shorter prison sentences with little scope for rehabilitation. The article concludes that these drivers are themselves driven by the politicisation of youth crime in Scotland and the abandonment of traditional Scottish values of minimal intervention and the paramountcy of the child's best interests.

KW - youth custody

KW - sentencing in Scotland

KW - youth justice

KW - Children's Hearings

KW - young people

KW - criminalisation

KW - custody

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2311.2010.00656.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2311.2010.00656.x

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 153

EP - 170

JO - The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice

JF - The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice

SN - 0265-5527

IS - 2

ER -