Expert quantification of uncertainties in a risk analysis for an infrastructure project

T.J. Bedford, M. Janssen, C. Verstegen, A. Willems

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is shown how calibration methods for expert judgement can be used to establish consensus about the uncertainties involved in a complex project risk analysis, where no consensus was present before. A case study is presented in which a project risk analysis was carried out for a large scale infrastructure project in the Netherlands. This involved the use of new and untried technology to reduce the frequency and scale of dredging operations over the long term by subtly changing the flow in a navigable river. The technology was to be applied at two separate sites. The project risk analysis was needed to identify the cheapest method of carrying out the work under the requirement that the whole project be completed with 95% probability by the year 2005. The decision problem was modelled using an influence diagram, which was quantified by expert judgement and made use of value of information techniques. Cooke's classical method was used to calibrate the experts. This is the first time that this method has been used to carry out a value of information study.
LanguageEnglish
Pages3-17
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Risk Research
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Risk analysis
quantification
uncertainty
expert
infrastructure
Dredging
Rivers
Calibration
Netherlands
river
Uncertainty
Quantification
Infrastructure projects
Value of information
Expert judgment

Keywords

  • risk management
  • influence diagram
  • project risk
  • management theory

Cite this

Bedford, T.J. ; Janssen, M. ; Verstegen, C. ; Willems, A. / Expert quantification of uncertainties in a risk analysis for an infrastructure project. In: Journal of Risk Research. 2005 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 3-17.
@article{61539b15b7f34b38a4c7dc79f43a8fbf,
title = "Expert quantification of uncertainties in a risk analysis for an infrastructure project",
abstract = "It is shown how calibration methods for expert judgement can be used to establish consensus about the uncertainties involved in a complex project risk analysis, where no consensus was present before. A case study is presented in which a project risk analysis was carried out for a large scale infrastructure project in the Netherlands. This involved the use of new and untried technology to reduce the frequency and scale of dredging operations over the long term by subtly changing the flow in a navigable river. The technology was to be applied at two separate sites. The project risk analysis was needed to identify the cheapest method of carrying out the work under the requirement that the whole project be completed with 95{\%} probability by the year 2005. The decision problem was modelled using an influence diagram, which was quantified by expert judgement and made use of value of information techniques. Cooke's classical method was used to calibrate the experts. This is the first time that this method has been used to carry out a value of information study.",
keywords = "risk management, influence diagram, project risk, management theory",
author = "T.J. Bedford and M. Janssen and C. Verstegen and A. Willems",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1080/1366987032000105298",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "3--17",
journal = "Journal of Risk Research",
issn = "1366-9877",
number = "1",

}

Expert quantification of uncertainties in a risk analysis for an infrastructure project. / Bedford, T.J.; Janssen, M.; Verstegen, C.; Willems, A.

In: Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2005, p. 3-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Expert quantification of uncertainties in a risk analysis for an infrastructure project

AU - Bedford, T.J.

AU - Janssen, M.

AU - Verstegen, C.

AU - Willems, A.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - It is shown how calibration methods for expert judgement can be used to establish consensus about the uncertainties involved in a complex project risk analysis, where no consensus was present before. A case study is presented in which a project risk analysis was carried out for a large scale infrastructure project in the Netherlands. This involved the use of new and untried technology to reduce the frequency and scale of dredging operations over the long term by subtly changing the flow in a navigable river. The technology was to be applied at two separate sites. The project risk analysis was needed to identify the cheapest method of carrying out the work under the requirement that the whole project be completed with 95% probability by the year 2005. The decision problem was modelled using an influence diagram, which was quantified by expert judgement and made use of value of information techniques. Cooke's classical method was used to calibrate the experts. This is the first time that this method has been used to carry out a value of information study.

AB - It is shown how calibration methods for expert judgement can be used to establish consensus about the uncertainties involved in a complex project risk analysis, where no consensus was present before. A case study is presented in which a project risk analysis was carried out for a large scale infrastructure project in the Netherlands. This involved the use of new and untried technology to reduce the frequency and scale of dredging operations over the long term by subtly changing the flow in a navigable river. The technology was to be applied at two separate sites. The project risk analysis was needed to identify the cheapest method of carrying out the work under the requirement that the whole project be completed with 95% probability by the year 2005. The decision problem was modelled using an influence diagram, which was quantified by expert judgement and made use of value of information techniques. Cooke's classical method was used to calibrate the experts. This is the first time that this method has been used to carry out a value of information study.

KW - risk management

KW - influence diagram

KW - project risk

KW - management theory

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1366987032000105298

U2 - 10.1080/1366987032000105298

DO - 10.1080/1366987032000105298

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 3

EP - 17

JO - Journal of Risk Research

T2 - Journal of Risk Research

JF - Journal of Risk Research

SN - 1366-9877

IS - 1

ER -