Expert elicitation for the judgment of prion disease risk uncertainties

Michael G Tyshenko, Susie ElSaadany, Tamer Oraby, Shalu Darshan, Willy Aspinall, Roger Cooke, Angela Catford, Daniel Krewski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is a high level of uncertainty surrounding the potential for iatrogenic prion transmission through transplantation, medical instrument reuse, blood transfusion, and blood product use due to a lack of evidence-based research on this important risk issue. A group of specialists was enlisted to evaluate some of the knowledge gaps in this area using the “Classical Model,” a structured elicitation procedure for weighting and pooling expert judgment. The elicitation exercise was undertaken in March 2009 with 11 transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) experts who were first calibrated using a series of seed questions for which the answers are known; they were then asked to answer a number of target questions that are important for risk assessment purposes, but for which there remains high uncertainty at this time. The target questions focused on variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (vCJD) prevalence, incubation times for vCJD, genetic susceptibility to prion disease, blood infectivity, prion reduction of blood and blood products, surgical instrument risks, and interspecies transmission of TSEs. The experts were also asked to perform pairwise risk rankings for 12 different potential routes of infection. Dura mater transplantation was seen as having the highest risk, while dental tissue grafts were viewed as presenting the lowest risk of iatrogenic transmission. The structured elicitation procedure provides a rational, auditable, and repeatable basis for obtaining useful information on prion disease risk issues, for which data are sparse.
LanguageEnglish
Pages261-285
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A: Current Issues
Volume74
Issue number2-4
Early online date6 Jan 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Prion Diseases
Prions
Uncertainty
Blood
Creutzfeldt-Jakob Syndrome
Transplantation
Dura Mater
Disease Susceptibility
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Surgical Instruments
Grafts
Blood Transfusion
Risk assessment
Seed
Prion
Expert elicitation
Seeds
Tooth
Tissue
Transplants

Keywords

  • Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease
  • iatrogenic transmission
  • evidence-based research
  • expert judgment

Cite this

Tyshenko, M. G., ElSaadany, S., Oraby, T., Darshan, S., Aspinall, W., Cooke, R., ... Krewski, D. (2011). Expert elicitation for the judgment of prion disease risk uncertainties. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A: Current Issues , 74(2-4), 261-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2011.529783
Tyshenko, Michael G ; ElSaadany, Susie ; Oraby, Tamer ; Darshan, Shalu ; Aspinall, Willy ; Cooke, Roger ; Catford, Angela ; Krewski, Daniel. / Expert elicitation for the judgment of prion disease risk uncertainties. In: Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A: Current Issues . 2011 ; Vol. 74, No. 2-4. pp. 261-285.
@article{91d4cde5deb24422837b9e9f848f9292,
title = "Expert elicitation for the judgment of prion disease risk uncertainties",
abstract = "There is a high level of uncertainty surrounding the potential for iatrogenic prion transmission through transplantation, medical instrument reuse, blood transfusion, and blood product use due to a lack of evidence-based research on this important risk issue. A group of specialists was enlisted to evaluate some of the knowledge gaps in this area using the “Classical Model,” a structured elicitation procedure for weighting and pooling expert judgment. The elicitation exercise was undertaken in March 2009 with 11 transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) experts who were first calibrated using a series of seed questions for which the answers are known; they were then asked to answer a number of target questions that are important for risk assessment purposes, but for which there remains high uncertainty at this time. The target questions focused on variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (vCJD) prevalence, incubation times for vCJD, genetic susceptibility to prion disease, blood infectivity, prion reduction of blood and blood products, surgical instrument risks, and interspecies transmission of TSEs. The experts were also asked to perform pairwise risk rankings for 12 different potential routes of infection. Dura mater transplantation was seen as having the highest risk, while dental tissue grafts were viewed as presenting the lowest risk of iatrogenic transmission. The structured elicitation procedure provides a rational, auditable, and repeatable basis for obtaining useful information on prion disease risk issues, for which data are sparse.",
keywords = "Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease, iatrogenic transmission, evidence-based research, expert judgment",
author = "Tyshenko, {Michael G} and Susie ElSaadany and Tamer Oraby and Shalu Darshan and Willy Aspinall and Roger Cooke and Angela Catford and Daniel Krewski",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1080/15287394.2011.529783",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
pages = "261--285",
journal = "Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A: Current Issues",
issn = "1528-7394",
number = "2-4",

}

Tyshenko, MG, ElSaadany, S, Oraby, T, Darshan, S, Aspinall, W, Cooke, R, Catford, A & Krewski, D 2011, 'Expert elicitation for the judgment of prion disease risk uncertainties' Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A: Current Issues , vol. 74, no. 2-4, pp. 261-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2011.529783

Expert elicitation for the judgment of prion disease risk uncertainties. / Tyshenko, Michael G; ElSaadany, Susie; Oraby, Tamer; Darshan, Shalu; Aspinall, Willy; Cooke, Roger; Catford, Angela; Krewski, Daniel.

In: Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A: Current Issues , Vol. 74, No. 2-4, 2011, p. 261-285.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Expert elicitation for the judgment of prion disease risk uncertainties

AU - Tyshenko, Michael G

AU - ElSaadany, Susie

AU - Oraby, Tamer

AU - Darshan, Shalu

AU - Aspinall, Willy

AU - Cooke, Roger

AU - Catford, Angela

AU - Krewski, Daniel

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - There is a high level of uncertainty surrounding the potential for iatrogenic prion transmission through transplantation, medical instrument reuse, blood transfusion, and blood product use due to a lack of evidence-based research on this important risk issue. A group of specialists was enlisted to evaluate some of the knowledge gaps in this area using the “Classical Model,” a structured elicitation procedure for weighting and pooling expert judgment. The elicitation exercise was undertaken in March 2009 with 11 transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) experts who were first calibrated using a series of seed questions for which the answers are known; they were then asked to answer a number of target questions that are important for risk assessment purposes, but for which there remains high uncertainty at this time. The target questions focused on variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (vCJD) prevalence, incubation times for vCJD, genetic susceptibility to prion disease, blood infectivity, prion reduction of blood and blood products, surgical instrument risks, and interspecies transmission of TSEs. The experts were also asked to perform pairwise risk rankings for 12 different potential routes of infection. Dura mater transplantation was seen as having the highest risk, while dental tissue grafts were viewed as presenting the lowest risk of iatrogenic transmission. The structured elicitation procedure provides a rational, auditable, and repeatable basis for obtaining useful information on prion disease risk issues, for which data are sparse.

AB - There is a high level of uncertainty surrounding the potential for iatrogenic prion transmission through transplantation, medical instrument reuse, blood transfusion, and blood product use due to a lack of evidence-based research on this important risk issue. A group of specialists was enlisted to evaluate some of the knowledge gaps in this area using the “Classical Model,” a structured elicitation procedure for weighting and pooling expert judgment. The elicitation exercise was undertaken in March 2009 with 11 transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) experts who were first calibrated using a series of seed questions for which the answers are known; they were then asked to answer a number of target questions that are important for risk assessment purposes, but for which there remains high uncertainty at this time. The target questions focused on variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (vCJD) prevalence, incubation times for vCJD, genetic susceptibility to prion disease, blood infectivity, prion reduction of blood and blood products, surgical instrument risks, and interspecies transmission of TSEs. The experts were also asked to perform pairwise risk rankings for 12 different potential routes of infection. Dura mater transplantation was seen as having the highest risk, while dental tissue grafts were viewed as presenting the lowest risk of iatrogenic transmission. The structured elicitation procedure provides a rational, auditable, and repeatable basis for obtaining useful information on prion disease risk issues, for which data are sparse.

KW - Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease

KW - iatrogenic transmission

KW - evidence-based research

KW - expert judgment

U2 - 10.1080/15287394.2011.529783

DO - 10.1080/15287394.2011.529783

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 261

EP - 285

JO - Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A: Current Issues

T2 - Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A: Current Issues

JF - Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A: Current Issues

SN - 1528-7394

IS - 2-4

ER -