Excessive and unreasonable - the politics of the Scottish hit list

A.F. Midwinter, M. Keating, P. Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Scotland) Act marks a major change in central-local relations in allowing selective intervention in the expenditure decisions of individual councils. The criteria for action, based upon the concept of 'excessive and unreasonable' expenditure are broadly drawn. In taking action against seven councils in 1981-2, the Scottish Office applied its own criteria inconsistently. The case against the councils lacked intellectual credibility and an alternative 'hit list' could as plausibly be produced. The councils' reactions and the exchanges with the Scottish Office show a varied pattern, with a minority stressing the principle of local autonomy. The Act has failed to achieve the objectives which central government appeared to have in mind. It has, instead, further eroded local autonomy and destabilized central-local relations in Scotland.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)394-417
Number of pages23
JournalPolitical Studies
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1983

Fingerprint

expenditures
autonomy
act
politics
credibility
minority

Keywords

  • Scottish politics
  • local government

Cite this

Midwinter, A.F. ; Keating, M. ; Taylor, P. / Excessive and unreasonable - the politics of the Scottish hit list. In: Political Studies. 1983 ; Vol. 31, No. 3. pp. 394-417.
@article{90b8c6f9f9564df5bbe3c79b286e0fd6,
title = "Excessive and unreasonable - the politics of the Scottish hit list",
abstract = "The Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Scotland) Act marks a major change in central-local relations in allowing selective intervention in the expenditure decisions of individual councils. The criteria for action, based upon the concept of 'excessive and unreasonable' expenditure are broadly drawn. In taking action against seven councils in 1981-2, the Scottish Office applied its own criteria inconsistently. The case against the councils lacked intellectual credibility and an alternative 'hit list' could as plausibly be produced. The councils' reactions and the exchanges with the Scottish Office show a varied pattern, with a minority stressing the principle of local autonomy. The Act has failed to achieve the objectives which central government appeared to have in mind. It has, instead, further eroded local autonomy and destabilized central-local relations in Scotland.",
keywords = "Scottish politics, local government",
author = "A.F. Midwinter and M. Keating and P. Taylor",
note = "No contact email found.",
year = "1983",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9248.1983.tb01771.x",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "394--417",
journal = "Political Studies",
issn = "0032-3217",
number = "3",

}

Midwinter, AF, Keating, M & Taylor, P 1983, 'Excessive and unreasonable - the politics of the Scottish hit list', Political Studies, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 394-417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1983.tb01771.x

Excessive and unreasonable - the politics of the Scottish hit list. / Midwinter, A.F.; Keating, M.; Taylor, P.

In: Political Studies, Vol. 31, No. 3, 1983, p. 394-417.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Excessive and unreasonable - the politics of the Scottish hit list

AU - Midwinter, A.F.

AU - Keating, M.

AU - Taylor, P.

N1 - No contact email found.

PY - 1983

Y1 - 1983

N2 - The Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Scotland) Act marks a major change in central-local relations in allowing selective intervention in the expenditure decisions of individual councils. The criteria for action, based upon the concept of 'excessive and unreasonable' expenditure are broadly drawn. In taking action against seven councils in 1981-2, the Scottish Office applied its own criteria inconsistently. The case against the councils lacked intellectual credibility and an alternative 'hit list' could as plausibly be produced. The councils' reactions and the exchanges with the Scottish Office show a varied pattern, with a minority stressing the principle of local autonomy. The Act has failed to achieve the objectives which central government appeared to have in mind. It has, instead, further eroded local autonomy and destabilized central-local relations in Scotland.

AB - The Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Scotland) Act marks a major change in central-local relations in allowing selective intervention in the expenditure decisions of individual councils. The criteria for action, based upon the concept of 'excessive and unreasonable' expenditure are broadly drawn. In taking action against seven councils in 1981-2, the Scottish Office applied its own criteria inconsistently. The case against the councils lacked intellectual credibility and an alternative 'hit list' could as plausibly be produced. The councils' reactions and the exchanges with the Scottish Office show a varied pattern, with a minority stressing the principle of local autonomy. The Act has failed to achieve the objectives which central government appeared to have in mind. It has, instead, further eroded local autonomy and destabilized central-local relations in Scotland.

KW - Scottish politics

KW - local government

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1983.tb01771.x

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1983.tb01771.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1983.tb01771.x

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 394

EP - 417

JO - Political Studies

JF - Political Studies

SN - 0032-3217

IS - 3

ER -

Midwinter AF, Keating M, Taylor P. Excessive and unreasonable - the politics of the Scottish hit list. Political Studies. 1983;31(3):394-417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1983.tb01771.x

Access to Document