Examining 'postmulticultural' and civic Turns in the Netherlands, Britain, Germany, and Denmark

Nasar Meer, Per Mouritsen, Daniel Faas, Nynke de Witte

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    25 Citations (Scopus)
    110 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    There is a widely shared view that the appeal of multiculturalism as a public policy has suffered considerable political damage. In many European states the turn to “civic” measures and discourses has been deemed more suitable for the objectives of minority integration and the promotion of preferred modes of social and political unity. It is therefore said that the first decade of the new century has been characterized by a reorientation in immigrant integration policies—from liberal culturalist to the “return of assimilation” (Brubaker, 2001), on route to a broader “retreat from multiculturalism” (Joppke, 2004). In this article, we argue that such portrayals mask a tendency that is more complicated in some cases and much less evident in others. To elaborate this, we offer a detailed account of the inception and then alleged movement away from positions in favor of multiculturalism in two countries that have adopted different versions of it, namely the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, and two countries that have historically rejected multiculturalism, namely Denmark and Germany. We argue that while there is undoubtedly a rhetorical separation between multiculturalism and civic integration, the latter is in some cases building on the former, and broadly needs to be understood as more than a retreat of multiculturalism. Taking seriously Banting and Kymlicka’s argument that understanding the evolution of integration requires the “the mind-set of an archaeologist,” we offer a policy genealogy that allows us to set the backlash against multiculturalism in context, in manner that explicates its provenance, permutations, and implications.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalAmerican Behavioral Scientist
    Early online date12 Jan 2015
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    Cultural Diversity
    Denmark
    multicultural society
    Netherlands
    Germany
    Genealogy and Heraldry
    Public Policy
    Masks
    genealogy
    assimilation
    appeal
    damages
    public policy
    promotion
    immigrant
    minority
    discourse

    Keywords

    • multiculturalism
    • civic integration
    • citizenship
    • Britain
    • Netherlands
    • Germany
    • Denmark

    Cite this

    @article{9d8e4a503586469c84b1fc0bda8c6282,
    title = "Examining 'postmulticultural' and civic Turns in the Netherlands, Britain, Germany, and Denmark",
    abstract = "There is a widely shared view that the appeal of multiculturalism as a public policy has suffered considerable political damage. In many European states the turn to “civic” measures and discourses has been deemed more suitable for the objectives of minority integration and the promotion of preferred modes of social and political unity. It is therefore said that the first decade of the new century has been characterized by a reorientation in immigrant integration policies—from liberal culturalist to the “return of assimilation” (Brubaker, 2001), on route to a broader “retreat from multiculturalism” (Joppke, 2004). In this article, we argue that such portrayals mask a tendency that is more complicated in some cases and much less evident in others. To elaborate this, we offer a detailed account of the inception and then alleged movement away from positions in favor of multiculturalism in two countries that have adopted different versions of it, namely the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, and two countries that have historically rejected multiculturalism, namely Denmark and Germany. We argue that while there is undoubtedly a rhetorical separation between multiculturalism and civic integration, the latter is in some cases building on the former, and broadly needs to be understood as more than a retreat of multiculturalism. Taking seriously Banting and Kymlicka’s argument that understanding the evolution of integration requires the “the mind-set of an archaeologist,” we offer a policy genealogy that allows us to set the backlash against multiculturalism in context, in manner that explicates its provenance, permutations, and implications.",
    keywords = "multiculturalism, civic integration, citizenship, Britain, Netherlands, Germany, Denmark",
    author = "Nasar Meer and Per Mouritsen and Daniel Faas and {de Witte}, Nynke",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1177/0002764214566496",
    language = "English",
    journal = "American Behavioral Scientist",
    issn = "0002-7642",

    }

    Examining 'postmulticultural' and civic Turns in the Netherlands, Britain, Germany, and Denmark. / Meer, Nasar; Mouritsen, Per; Faas, Daniel; de Witte, Nynke.

    In: American Behavioral Scientist, 2015.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Examining 'postmulticultural' and civic Turns in the Netherlands, Britain, Germany, and Denmark

    AU - Meer, Nasar

    AU - Mouritsen, Per

    AU - Faas, Daniel

    AU - de Witte, Nynke

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - There is a widely shared view that the appeal of multiculturalism as a public policy has suffered considerable political damage. In many European states the turn to “civic” measures and discourses has been deemed more suitable for the objectives of minority integration and the promotion of preferred modes of social and political unity. It is therefore said that the first decade of the new century has been characterized by a reorientation in immigrant integration policies—from liberal culturalist to the “return of assimilation” (Brubaker, 2001), on route to a broader “retreat from multiculturalism” (Joppke, 2004). In this article, we argue that such portrayals mask a tendency that is more complicated in some cases and much less evident in others. To elaborate this, we offer a detailed account of the inception and then alleged movement away from positions in favor of multiculturalism in two countries that have adopted different versions of it, namely the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, and two countries that have historically rejected multiculturalism, namely Denmark and Germany. We argue that while there is undoubtedly a rhetorical separation between multiculturalism and civic integration, the latter is in some cases building on the former, and broadly needs to be understood as more than a retreat of multiculturalism. Taking seriously Banting and Kymlicka’s argument that understanding the evolution of integration requires the “the mind-set of an archaeologist,” we offer a policy genealogy that allows us to set the backlash against multiculturalism in context, in manner that explicates its provenance, permutations, and implications.

    AB - There is a widely shared view that the appeal of multiculturalism as a public policy has suffered considerable political damage. In many European states the turn to “civic” measures and discourses has been deemed more suitable for the objectives of minority integration and the promotion of preferred modes of social and political unity. It is therefore said that the first decade of the new century has been characterized by a reorientation in immigrant integration policies—from liberal culturalist to the “return of assimilation” (Brubaker, 2001), on route to a broader “retreat from multiculturalism” (Joppke, 2004). In this article, we argue that such portrayals mask a tendency that is more complicated in some cases and much less evident in others. To elaborate this, we offer a detailed account of the inception and then alleged movement away from positions in favor of multiculturalism in two countries that have adopted different versions of it, namely the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, and two countries that have historically rejected multiculturalism, namely Denmark and Germany. We argue that while there is undoubtedly a rhetorical separation between multiculturalism and civic integration, the latter is in some cases building on the former, and broadly needs to be understood as more than a retreat of multiculturalism. Taking seriously Banting and Kymlicka’s argument that understanding the evolution of integration requires the “the mind-set of an archaeologist,” we offer a policy genealogy that allows us to set the backlash against multiculturalism in context, in manner that explicates its provenance, permutations, and implications.

    KW - multiculturalism

    KW - civic integration

    KW - citizenship

    KW - Britain

    KW - Netherlands

    KW - Germany

    KW - Denmark

    U2 - 10.1177/0002764214566496

    DO - 10.1177/0002764214566496

    M3 - Article

    JO - American Behavioral Scientist

    JF - American Behavioral Scientist

    SN - 0002-7642

    ER -