Evolution in economic geography: institutions, political economy, and adaptation

Danny MacKinnon, Andrew Cumbers, Andy Pike, Kean Birch, R. McMaster

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    277 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Economic geography has, over the past decade or so, drawn upon ideas from evolutionary economics in trying to understand processes of regional growth and change. Recently, some researchers have sought to delimit and develop an "evolutionary economic geography" (EEG), aiming to create a more systematic theoretical framework for research. This article provides a sympathetic critique and elaboration of this emergent EEG but takes issue with some aspects of its characterization in recent programmatic statements. While acknowledging that EEG is an evolving and pluralist project, we are concerned that the reliance on certain theoretical frameworks that are imported from evolutionary economics and complexity science threatens to isolate it from other approaches in economic geography, limiting the opportunities for cross-fertilization. In response, the article seeks to develop a social and pluralist conception of institutions and social agency in EEG, drawing upon the writings of leading institutional economists, and to link evolutionary concepts to political economy approaches, arguing that the evolution of the economic landscape must be related to processes of capital accumulation and uneven development. As such, we favor the use of evolutionary and institutional concepts within a geographical political economy approach, rather than the construction of some kind of theoretically separate EEG-evolution in economic geography, not an evolutionary economic geography.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages129-150
    Number of pages21
    JournalEconomic geography
    Volume85
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2009

    Fingerprint

    economic geography
    political economy
    economics
    social agencies
    uneven development
    Economic geography
    Evolutionary economic geography
    Political economy
    capital accumulation
    economist

    Keywords

    • evolution
    • institutions
    • political economy
    • path dependence
    • regional adaptation

    Cite this

    MacKinnon, D., Cumbers, A., Pike, A., Birch, K., & McMaster, R. (2009). Evolution in economic geography: institutions, political economy, and adaptation. Economic geography, 85(2), 129-150.
    MacKinnon, Danny ; Cumbers, Andrew ; Pike, Andy ; Birch, Kean ; McMaster, R. / Evolution in economic geography: institutions, political economy, and adaptation. In: Economic geography. 2009 ; Vol. 85, No. 2. pp. 129-150.
    @article{c1700490e46546a380aad9608b81977c,
    title = "Evolution in economic geography: institutions, political economy, and adaptation",
    abstract = "Economic geography has, over the past decade or so, drawn upon ideas from evolutionary economics in trying to understand processes of regional growth and change. Recently, some researchers have sought to delimit and develop an {"}evolutionary economic geography{"} (EEG), aiming to create a more systematic theoretical framework for research. This article provides a sympathetic critique and elaboration of this emergent EEG but takes issue with some aspects of its characterization in recent programmatic statements. While acknowledging that EEG is an evolving and pluralist project, we are concerned that the reliance on certain theoretical frameworks that are imported from evolutionary economics and complexity science threatens to isolate it from other approaches in economic geography, limiting the opportunities for cross-fertilization. In response, the article seeks to develop a social and pluralist conception of institutions and social agency in EEG, drawing upon the writings of leading institutional economists, and to link evolutionary concepts to political economy approaches, arguing that the evolution of the economic landscape must be related to processes of capital accumulation and uneven development. As such, we favor the use of evolutionary and institutional concepts within a geographical political economy approach, rather than the construction of some kind of theoretically separate EEG-evolution in economic geography, not an evolutionary economic geography.",
    keywords = "evolution, institutions, political economy, path dependence, regional adaptation",
    author = "Danny MacKinnon and Andrew Cumbers and Andy Pike and Kean Birch and R. McMaster",
    year = "2009",
    month = "4",
    language = "English",
    volume = "85",
    pages = "129--150",
    journal = "Economic geography",
    issn = "0013-0095",
    number = "2",

    }

    MacKinnon, D, Cumbers, A, Pike, A, Birch, K & McMaster, R 2009, 'Evolution in economic geography: institutions, political economy, and adaptation' Economic geography, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 129-150.

    Evolution in economic geography: institutions, political economy, and adaptation. / MacKinnon, Danny; Cumbers, Andrew; Pike, Andy; Birch, Kean; McMaster, R.

    In: Economic geography, Vol. 85, No. 2, 04.2009, p. 129-150.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Evolution in economic geography: institutions, political economy, and adaptation

    AU - MacKinnon, Danny

    AU - Cumbers, Andrew

    AU - Pike, Andy

    AU - Birch, Kean

    AU - McMaster, R.

    PY - 2009/4

    Y1 - 2009/4

    N2 - Economic geography has, over the past decade or so, drawn upon ideas from evolutionary economics in trying to understand processes of regional growth and change. Recently, some researchers have sought to delimit and develop an "evolutionary economic geography" (EEG), aiming to create a more systematic theoretical framework for research. This article provides a sympathetic critique and elaboration of this emergent EEG but takes issue with some aspects of its characterization in recent programmatic statements. While acknowledging that EEG is an evolving and pluralist project, we are concerned that the reliance on certain theoretical frameworks that are imported from evolutionary economics and complexity science threatens to isolate it from other approaches in economic geography, limiting the opportunities for cross-fertilization. In response, the article seeks to develop a social and pluralist conception of institutions and social agency in EEG, drawing upon the writings of leading institutional economists, and to link evolutionary concepts to political economy approaches, arguing that the evolution of the economic landscape must be related to processes of capital accumulation and uneven development. As such, we favor the use of evolutionary and institutional concepts within a geographical political economy approach, rather than the construction of some kind of theoretically separate EEG-evolution in economic geography, not an evolutionary economic geography.

    AB - Economic geography has, over the past decade or so, drawn upon ideas from evolutionary economics in trying to understand processes of regional growth and change. Recently, some researchers have sought to delimit and develop an "evolutionary economic geography" (EEG), aiming to create a more systematic theoretical framework for research. This article provides a sympathetic critique and elaboration of this emergent EEG but takes issue with some aspects of its characterization in recent programmatic statements. While acknowledging that EEG is an evolving and pluralist project, we are concerned that the reliance on certain theoretical frameworks that are imported from evolutionary economics and complexity science threatens to isolate it from other approaches in economic geography, limiting the opportunities for cross-fertilization. In response, the article seeks to develop a social and pluralist conception of institutions and social agency in EEG, drawing upon the writings of leading institutional economists, and to link evolutionary concepts to political economy approaches, arguing that the evolution of the economic landscape must be related to processes of capital accumulation and uneven development. As such, we favor the use of evolutionary and institutional concepts within a geographical political economy approach, rather than the construction of some kind of theoretically separate EEG-evolution in economic geography, not an evolutionary economic geography.

    KW - evolution

    KW - institutions

    KW - political economy

    KW - path dependence

    KW - regional adaptation

    UR - http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122260387/abstract

    M3 - Article

    VL - 85

    SP - 129

    EP - 150

    JO - Economic geography

    T2 - Economic geography

    JF - Economic geography

    SN - 0013-0095

    IS - 2

    ER -

    MacKinnon D, Cumbers A, Pike A, Birch K, McMaster R. Evolution in economic geography: institutions, political economy, and adaptation. Economic geography. 2009 Apr;85(2):129-150.