Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests that the environmental Kuznets curve does not exist

R.J. Perman, D. Stern

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

232 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

he Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis - an inverted U-shape relation between various indicators of environmental degradation and income per capita - has become one of the 'stylised facts' of environmental and resource economics. This is despite considerable criticism on both theoretical and empirical grounds. Cointegration analysis can be used to test the validity of such stylised facts when the data involved contain stochastic trends. In the present paper, we use cointegration analysis to test the EKC hypothesis using a panel dataset of sulfur emissions and GDP data for 74 countries over a span of 31 years. We find that the data is stochastically trending in the time-series dimension. Given this, and interpreting the EKC as a long run equilibrium relationship, support for the hypothesis requires that an appropriate model cointegrates and that sulfur emissions are a concave function of income. Individual and panel cointegration tests cast doubt on the general applicability of the hypothesised relationship. Even when we find cointegration, many of the relationships for individual countries are not concave. The results show that the EKC is a problematic concept, at least in the case of sulfur emissions.
LanguageEnglish
Pages325-347
Number of pages22
JournalAustralian Journal of Agriculture and Resource Economics
Volume47
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Sulfur
sulfur
environmental economics
environmental degradation
testing
time series analysis
income
Economics
Panel unit root and cointegration tests
Environmental Kuznets curve
Stylized facts
Cointegration analysis

Keywords

  • agriculture
  • economics
  • environment
  • stochastic trends

Cite this

@article{070e4b3121e641e6bebad8c97079ab5d,
title = "Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests that the environmental Kuznets curve does not exist",
abstract = "he Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis - an inverted U-shape relation between various indicators of environmental degradation and income per capita - has become one of the 'stylised facts' of environmental and resource economics. This is despite considerable criticism on both theoretical and empirical grounds. Cointegration analysis can be used to test the validity of such stylised facts when the data involved contain stochastic trends. In the present paper, we use cointegration analysis to test the EKC hypothesis using a panel dataset of sulfur emissions and GDP data for 74 countries over a span of 31 years. We find that the data is stochastically trending in the time-series dimension. Given this, and interpreting the EKC as a long run equilibrium relationship, support for the hypothesis requires that an appropriate model cointegrates and that sulfur emissions are a concave function of income. Individual and panel cointegration tests cast doubt on the general applicability of the hypothesised relationship. Even when we find cointegration, many of the relationships for individual countries are not concave. The results show that the EKC is a problematic concept, at least in the case of sulfur emissions.",
keywords = "agriculture, economics, environment, stochastic trends",
author = "R.J. Perman and D. Stern",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1111/1467-8489.00216",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "325--347",
journal = "Australian Journal of Agriculture and Resource Economics",
issn = "1364-985X",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests that the environmental Kuznets curve does not exist

AU - Perman, R.J.

AU - Stern, D.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - he Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis - an inverted U-shape relation between various indicators of environmental degradation and income per capita - has become one of the 'stylised facts' of environmental and resource economics. This is despite considerable criticism on both theoretical and empirical grounds. Cointegration analysis can be used to test the validity of such stylised facts when the data involved contain stochastic trends. In the present paper, we use cointegration analysis to test the EKC hypothesis using a panel dataset of sulfur emissions and GDP data for 74 countries over a span of 31 years. We find that the data is stochastically trending in the time-series dimension. Given this, and interpreting the EKC as a long run equilibrium relationship, support for the hypothesis requires that an appropriate model cointegrates and that sulfur emissions are a concave function of income. Individual and panel cointegration tests cast doubt on the general applicability of the hypothesised relationship. Even when we find cointegration, many of the relationships for individual countries are not concave. The results show that the EKC is a problematic concept, at least in the case of sulfur emissions.

AB - he Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis - an inverted U-shape relation between various indicators of environmental degradation and income per capita - has become one of the 'stylised facts' of environmental and resource economics. This is despite considerable criticism on both theoretical and empirical grounds. Cointegration analysis can be used to test the validity of such stylised facts when the data involved contain stochastic trends. In the present paper, we use cointegration analysis to test the EKC hypothesis using a panel dataset of sulfur emissions and GDP data for 74 countries over a span of 31 years. We find that the data is stochastically trending in the time-series dimension. Given this, and interpreting the EKC as a long run equilibrium relationship, support for the hypothesis requires that an appropriate model cointegrates and that sulfur emissions are a concave function of income. Individual and panel cointegration tests cast doubt on the general applicability of the hypothesised relationship. Even when we find cointegration, many of the relationships for individual countries are not concave. The results show that the EKC is a problematic concept, at least in the case of sulfur emissions.

KW - agriculture

KW - economics

KW - environment

KW - stochastic trends

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.00216

U2 - 10.1111/1467-8489.00216

DO - 10.1111/1467-8489.00216

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 325

EP - 347

JO - Australian Journal of Agriculture and Resource Economics

T2 - Australian Journal of Agriculture and Resource Economics

JF - Australian Journal of Agriculture and Resource Economics

SN - 1364-985X

IS - 4

ER -