Evidence for on-line visual guidance during saccadic gaze shifts

M A Grealy, C M Craig, D N Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rapid orientating movements of the eyes are believed to be controlled ballistically. The mechanism underlying this control is thought to involve a comparison between the desired displacement of the eye and an estimate of its actual position (obtained from the integration of the eye velocity signal). This study shows, however, that under certain circumstances fast gaze movements may be controlled quite differently and may involve mechanisms which use visual information to guide movements prospectively. Subjects were required to make large gaze shifts in yaw towards a target whose location and motion were unknown prior to movement onset. Six of those tested demonstrated remarkable accuracy when making gaze shifts towards a target that appeared during their ongoing movement. In fact their level of accuracy was not significantly different from that shown when they performed a 'remembered' gaze shift to a known stationary target (F-3,F-15 = 0.15, p > 0.05). The lack of a stereotypical relationship between the skew of the gaze velocity profile and movement duration indicates that on-line modifications were being made. It is suggested that a fast route from the retina to the superior colliculus could account for this behaviour and that models of oculomotor control need to be updated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1799-1804
Number of pages6
JournalProceedings B: Biological Sciences
Volume266
Issue number1430
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Sept 1999

Keywords

  • prospective control
  • gaze shifting
  • oculomotor control
  • models
  • on-line visual guidance
  • eye-head coordination
  • superior colliculus
  • layer
  • movements
  • suppression
  • fixation
  • monkey
  • system

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence for on-line visual guidance during saccadic gaze shifts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this