Evaluation of seismic hazard for the assessment of historical elements at risk: description of input and selection of intensity measures

John Douglas, Darius M. Seyedi, Thomas Ulrich, Hormoz Modaressi, Evelyne Foerster, Kyriazis Pitilakis, Dimitris Pitilakis, Anna Karatzetzou, George Gazetas, Evangelia Garini, Marianna Loli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The assessment of historical elements at risk from earthquake loading presents a number of differences from the seismic evaluation of modern structures, for design or retrofitting purposes, which is covered by existing building codes, and for the development of fragility curves, procedures for which have been extensively developed in the past decade. This article briefly discusses: the hazard framework for historical assets, including a consideration of the appropriate return period to be used for such elements at risk; the intensity measures that could be used to describe earthquake shaking for the analysis of historical assets; and available approaches for their assessment. We then discuss various unique aspects of historical assets that mean the characterisation of earthquake loading must be different from that for modern structures. For example, historical buildings are often composed of heterogeneous materials (e.g., old masonry) and they are sometimes located where strong local site effects occur due to: steep topography (e.g., hilltops), basin effects or foundations built on the remains of previous structures. Standard seismic hazard assessment undertaken for modern structures and the majority of sites is generally not appropriate. Within the PERPETUATE project performance-based assessments, using nonlinear static and dynamic analyses for the evaluation of structural response of historical assets, were undertaken. The steps outlined in this article are important for input to these assessments.

LanguageEnglish
Pages49-65
Number of pages17
JournalBulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Volume13
Issue number1
Early online date26 Mar 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

Fingerprint

seismic hazard
hazards
Earthquakes
Hazards
earthquake
evaluation
earthquakes
structural response
Retrofitting
masonry
site effect
return period
hazard assessment
Topography
retrofitting
hazard
topography
shaking
basin
curves

Keywords

  • cultural heritage assets
  • fragility curves
  • historical buildings
  • intensity measures
  • monuments
  • seismic hazard assessment
  • site effects

Cite this

Douglas, John ; Seyedi, Darius M. ; Ulrich, Thomas ; Modaressi, Hormoz ; Foerster, Evelyne ; Pitilakis, Kyriazis ; Pitilakis, Dimitris ; Karatzetzou, Anna ; Gazetas, George ; Garini, Evangelia ; Loli, Marianna. / Evaluation of seismic hazard for the assessment of historical elements at risk : description of input and selection of intensity measures. In: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 2015 ; Vol. 13, No. 1. pp. 49-65.
@article{e0cb64dfa23940f1a35d09c4fd7af13a,
title = "Evaluation of seismic hazard for the assessment of historical elements at risk: description of input and selection of intensity measures",
abstract = "The assessment of historical elements at risk from earthquake loading presents a number of differences from the seismic evaluation of modern structures, for design or retrofitting purposes, which is covered by existing building codes, and for the development of fragility curves, procedures for which have been extensively developed in the past decade. This article briefly discusses: the hazard framework for historical assets, including a consideration of the appropriate return period to be used for such elements at risk; the intensity measures that could be used to describe earthquake shaking for the analysis of historical assets; and available approaches for their assessment. We then discuss various unique aspects of historical assets that mean the characterisation of earthquake loading must be different from that for modern structures. For example, historical buildings are often composed of heterogeneous materials (e.g., old masonry) and they are sometimes located where strong local site effects occur due to: steep topography (e.g., hilltops), basin effects or foundations built on the remains of previous structures. Standard seismic hazard assessment undertaken for modern structures and the majority of sites is generally not appropriate. Within the PERPETUATE project performance-based assessments, using nonlinear static and dynamic analyses for the evaluation of structural response of historical assets, were undertaken. The steps outlined in this article are important for input to these assessments.",
keywords = "cultural heritage assets, fragility curves, historical buildings, intensity measures, monuments, seismic hazard assessment, site effects",
author = "John Douglas and Seyedi, {Darius M.} and Thomas Ulrich and Hormoz Modaressi and Evelyne Foerster and Kyriazis Pitilakis and Dimitris Pitilakis and Anna Karatzetzou and George Gazetas and Evangelia Garini and Marianna Loli",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10518-014-9606-0",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "49--65",
journal = "Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering",
issn = "1570-761X",
number = "1",

}

Douglas, J, Seyedi, DM, Ulrich, T, Modaressi, H, Foerster, E, Pitilakis, K, Pitilakis, D, Karatzetzou, A, Gazetas, G, Garini, E & Loli, M 2015, 'Evaluation of seismic hazard for the assessment of historical elements at risk: description of input and selection of intensity measures' Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 49-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9606-0

Evaluation of seismic hazard for the assessment of historical elements at risk : description of input and selection of intensity measures. / Douglas, John; Seyedi, Darius M.; Ulrich, Thomas; Modaressi, Hormoz; Foerster, Evelyne; Pitilakis, Kyriazis; Pitilakis, Dimitris; Karatzetzou, Anna; Gazetas, George; Garini, Evangelia; Loli, Marianna.

In: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 49-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of seismic hazard for the assessment of historical elements at risk

T2 - Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

AU - Douglas, John

AU - Seyedi, Darius M.

AU - Ulrich, Thomas

AU - Modaressi, Hormoz

AU - Foerster, Evelyne

AU - Pitilakis, Kyriazis

AU - Pitilakis, Dimitris

AU - Karatzetzou, Anna

AU - Gazetas, George

AU - Garini, Evangelia

AU - Loli, Marianna

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - The assessment of historical elements at risk from earthquake loading presents a number of differences from the seismic evaluation of modern structures, for design or retrofitting purposes, which is covered by existing building codes, and for the development of fragility curves, procedures for which have been extensively developed in the past decade. This article briefly discusses: the hazard framework for historical assets, including a consideration of the appropriate return period to be used for such elements at risk; the intensity measures that could be used to describe earthquake shaking for the analysis of historical assets; and available approaches for their assessment. We then discuss various unique aspects of historical assets that mean the characterisation of earthquake loading must be different from that for modern structures. For example, historical buildings are often composed of heterogeneous materials (e.g., old masonry) and they are sometimes located where strong local site effects occur due to: steep topography (e.g., hilltops), basin effects or foundations built on the remains of previous structures. Standard seismic hazard assessment undertaken for modern structures and the majority of sites is generally not appropriate. Within the PERPETUATE project performance-based assessments, using nonlinear static and dynamic analyses for the evaluation of structural response of historical assets, were undertaken. The steps outlined in this article are important for input to these assessments.

AB - The assessment of historical elements at risk from earthquake loading presents a number of differences from the seismic evaluation of modern structures, for design or retrofitting purposes, which is covered by existing building codes, and for the development of fragility curves, procedures for which have been extensively developed in the past decade. This article briefly discusses: the hazard framework for historical assets, including a consideration of the appropriate return period to be used for such elements at risk; the intensity measures that could be used to describe earthquake shaking for the analysis of historical assets; and available approaches for their assessment. We then discuss various unique aspects of historical assets that mean the characterisation of earthquake loading must be different from that for modern structures. For example, historical buildings are often composed of heterogeneous materials (e.g., old masonry) and they are sometimes located where strong local site effects occur due to: steep topography (e.g., hilltops), basin effects or foundations built on the remains of previous structures. Standard seismic hazard assessment undertaken for modern structures and the majority of sites is generally not appropriate. Within the PERPETUATE project performance-based assessments, using nonlinear static and dynamic analyses for the evaluation of structural response of historical assets, were undertaken. The steps outlined in this article are important for input to these assessments.

KW - cultural heritage assets

KW - fragility curves

KW - historical buildings

KW - intensity measures

KW - monuments

KW - seismic hazard assessment

KW - site effects

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84918564548&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10518-014-9606-0

DO - 10.1007/s10518-014-9606-0

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 49

EP - 65

JO - Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

JF - Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

SN - 1570-761X

IS - 1

ER -