TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of seismic hazard for the assessment of historical elements at risk
T2 - description of input and selection of intensity measures
AU - Douglas, John
AU - Seyedi, Darius M.
AU - Ulrich, Thomas
AU - Modaressi, Hormoz
AU - Foerster, Evelyne
AU - Pitilakis, Kyriazis
AU - Pitilakis, Dimitris
AU - Karatzetzou, Anna
AU - Gazetas, George
AU - Garini, Evangelia
AU - Loli, Marianna
PY - 2015/1/1
Y1 - 2015/1/1
N2 - The assessment of historical elements at risk from earthquake loading presents a number of differences from the seismic evaluation of modern structures, for design or retrofitting purposes, which is covered by existing building codes, and for the development of fragility curves, procedures for which have been extensively developed in the past decade. This article briefly discusses: the hazard framework for historical assets, including a consideration of the appropriate return period to be used for such elements at risk; the intensity measures that could be used to describe earthquake shaking for the analysis of historical assets; and available approaches for their assessment. We then discuss various unique aspects of historical assets that mean the characterisation of earthquake loading must be different from that for modern structures. For example, historical buildings are often composed of heterogeneous materials (e.g., old masonry) and they are sometimes located where strong local site effects occur due to: steep topography (e.g., hilltops), basin effects or foundations built on the remains of previous structures. Standard seismic hazard assessment undertaken for modern structures and the majority of sites is generally not appropriate. Within the PERPETUATE project performance-based assessments, using nonlinear static and dynamic analyses for the evaluation of structural response of historical assets, were undertaken. The steps outlined in this article are important for input to these assessments.
AB - The assessment of historical elements at risk from earthquake loading presents a number of differences from the seismic evaluation of modern structures, for design or retrofitting purposes, which is covered by existing building codes, and for the development of fragility curves, procedures for which have been extensively developed in the past decade. This article briefly discusses: the hazard framework for historical assets, including a consideration of the appropriate return period to be used for such elements at risk; the intensity measures that could be used to describe earthquake shaking for the analysis of historical assets; and available approaches for their assessment. We then discuss various unique aspects of historical assets that mean the characterisation of earthquake loading must be different from that for modern structures. For example, historical buildings are often composed of heterogeneous materials (e.g., old masonry) and they are sometimes located where strong local site effects occur due to: steep topography (e.g., hilltops), basin effects or foundations built on the remains of previous structures. Standard seismic hazard assessment undertaken for modern structures and the majority of sites is generally not appropriate. Within the PERPETUATE project performance-based assessments, using nonlinear static and dynamic analyses for the evaluation of structural response of historical assets, were undertaken. The steps outlined in this article are important for input to these assessments.
KW - cultural heritage assets
KW - fragility curves
KW - historical buildings
KW - intensity measures
KW - monuments
KW - seismic hazard assessment
KW - site effects
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84918564548&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10518-014-9606-0
DO - 10.1007/s10518-014-9606-0
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84918564548
SN - 1570-761X
VL - 13
SP - 49
EP - 65
JO - Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
JF - Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
IS - 1
ER -