Evaluation of safety exclusion zone for LNG bunkering station on LNG-fuelled ships

Byongug Jeong, Byung Suk Lee, Peilin Zhou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)
24 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

With increasing interests in using LNG as a marine fuel, safety issues for LNG bunkering have brought about global discussion on establishing a safety exclusion zone around LNG bunkering areas. However, international consensus has yet to be reached in determining an appropriate extent of the zone to ensure safe liquefied natural gas (LNG) bunkering. The purpose of this study is to identify potential risks of LNG bunkering and to present a statistical method for determining the safe exclusion zone around LNG bunkering station with the help of a purpose-built computer program, integrated quantitative risk assessment (IQRA). A probabilistic risk assessment approach was adopted in this study to determine the safety exclusion zone for two case ships: one, a 300,000 DWT very large ore carrier (VLOC) and the other a 32,000 DWT bulk carrier. The results are then compared with those obtained by a deterministic approach and the discrepancies are discussed. It was found from this study that the frequency of bunkering is one of the key factors in determining the extent of safety exclusion zone. Thus, a somewhat surprising result of 36 m radius safety exclusion zone for the 32,000 DWT bulk carrier compared to 6.4 m radius for the 300,000 DWT VLOC was obtained. It was also found that the deterministic approach produced a much more extensive safety exclusion zone for the 300,000 DWT VLOC subjected to infrequent large-scale LNG bunkering operations compared to the probabilistic approach, while it was reasonably consistent with the probabilistic approach for the 32,000 DWT bulk carrier which uses frequent small-scale bunkering.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-24
Number of pages25
JournalMarine Engineering and Technology
Early online date1 Mar 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 1 Mar 2017

Fingerprint

Liquefied natural gas
Ships
Ore carriers
Risk assessment
Computer program listings
Statistical methods

Keywords

  • quantitative risk assessment
  • LNG-fuelled ship
  • LNG bunkering
  • safety exclusion zone

Cite this

@article{7d2c8a571f234ab3918da150a1fa713e,
title = "Evaluation of safety exclusion zone for LNG bunkering station on LNG-fuelled ships",
abstract = "With increasing interests in using LNG as a marine fuel, safety issues for LNG bunkering have brought about global discussion on establishing a safety exclusion zone around LNG bunkering areas. However, international consensus has yet to be reached in determining an appropriate extent of the zone to ensure safe liquefied natural gas (LNG) bunkering. The purpose of this study is to identify potential risks of LNG bunkering and to present a statistical method for determining the safe exclusion zone around LNG bunkering station with the help of a purpose-built computer program, integrated quantitative risk assessment (IQRA). A probabilistic risk assessment approach was adopted in this study to determine the safety exclusion zone for two case ships: one, a 300,000 DWT very large ore carrier (VLOC) and the other a 32,000 DWT bulk carrier. The results are then compared with those obtained by a deterministic approach and the discrepancies are discussed. It was found from this study that the frequency of bunkering is one of the key factors in determining the extent of safety exclusion zone. Thus, a somewhat surprising result of 36 m radius safety exclusion zone for the 32,000 DWT bulk carrier compared to 6.4 m radius for the 300,000 DWT VLOC was obtained. It was also found that the deterministic approach produced a much more extensive safety exclusion zone for the 300,000 DWT VLOC subjected to infrequent large-scale LNG bunkering operations compared to the probabilistic approach, while it was reasonably consistent with the probabilistic approach for the 32,000 DWT bulk carrier which uses frequent small-scale bunkering.",
keywords = "quantitative risk assessment, LNG-fuelled ship, LNG bunkering, safety exclusion zone",
author = "Byongug Jeong and Lee, {Byung Suk} and Peilin Zhou",
note = "The Version of Record of this manuscript has been published and is available in Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology 01/03/2017. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/20464177.2017.1295786",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/20464177.2017.1295786",
language = "English",
pages = "1--24",
journal = "Marine Engineering and Technology",
issn = "2046-4177",

}

Evaluation of safety exclusion zone for LNG bunkering station on LNG-fuelled ships. / Jeong, Byongug; Lee, Byung Suk; Zhou, Peilin.

In: Marine Engineering and Technology, 01.03.2017, p. 1-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of safety exclusion zone for LNG bunkering station on LNG-fuelled ships

AU - Jeong, Byongug

AU - Lee, Byung Suk

AU - Zhou, Peilin

N1 - The Version of Record of this manuscript has been published and is available in Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology 01/03/2017. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/20464177.2017.1295786

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - With increasing interests in using LNG as a marine fuel, safety issues for LNG bunkering have brought about global discussion on establishing a safety exclusion zone around LNG bunkering areas. However, international consensus has yet to be reached in determining an appropriate extent of the zone to ensure safe liquefied natural gas (LNG) bunkering. The purpose of this study is to identify potential risks of LNG bunkering and to present a statistical method for determining the safe exclusion zone around LNG bunkering station with the help of a purpose-built computer program, integrated quantitative risk assessment (IQRA). A probabilistic risk assessment approach was adopted in this study to determine the safety exclusion zone for two case ships: one, a 300,000 DWT very large ore carrier (VLOC) and the other a 32,000 DWT bulk carrier. The results are then compared with those obtained by a deterministic approach and the discrepancies are discussed. It was found from this study that the frequency of bunkering is one of the key factors in determining the extent of safety exclusion zone. Thus, a somewhat surprising result of 36 m radius safety exclusion zone for the 32,000 DWT bulk carrier compared to 6.4 m radius for the 300,000 DWT VLOC was obtained. It was also found that the deterministic approach produced a much more extensive safety exclusion zone for the 300,000 DWT VLOC subjected to infrequent large-scale LNG bunkering operations compared to the probabilistic approach, while it was reasonably consistent with the probabilistic approach for the 32,000 DWT bulk carrier which uses frequent small-scale bunkering.

AB - With increasing interests in using LNG as a marine fuel, safety issues for LNG bunkering have brought about global discussion on establishing a safety exclusion zone around LNG bunkering areas. However, international consensus has yet to be reached in determining an appropriate extent of the zone to ensure safe liquefied natural gas (LNG) bunkering. The purpose of this study is to identify potential risks of LNG bunkering and to present a statistical method for determining the safe exclusion zone around LNG bunkering station with the help of a purpose-built computer program, integrated quantitative risk assessment (IQRA). A probabilistic risk assessment approach was adopted in this study to determine the safety exclusion zone for two case ships: one, a 300,000 DWT very large ore carrier (VLOC) and the other a 32,000 DWT bulk carrier. The results are then compared with those obtained by a deterministic approach and the discrepancies are discussed. It was found from this study that the frequency of bunkering is one of the key factors in determining the extent of safety exclusion zone. Thus, a somewhat surprising result of 36 m radius safety exclusion zone for the 32,000 DWT bulk carrier compared to 6.4 m radius for the 300,000 DWT VLOC was obtained. It was also found that the deterministic approach produced a much more extensive safety exclusion zone for the 300,000 DWT VLOC subjected to infrequent large-scale LNG bunkering operations compared to the probabilistic approach, while it was reasonably consistent with the probabilistic approach for the 32,000 DWT bulk carrier which uses frequent small-scale bunkering.

KW - quantitative risk assessment

KW - LNG-fuelled ship

KW - LNG bunkering

KW - safety exclusion zone

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tmar20

U2 - 10.1080/20464177.2017.1295786

DO - 10.1080/20464177.2017.1295786

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 24

JO - Marine Engineering and Technology

JF - Marine Engineering and Technology

SN - 2046-4177

ER -