Evaluation of functional methods of joint centre determination for quasi-planar movement

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Functional methods identify joint centres as the centre of rotation (CoR) of two
adjacent movements during an ad-hoc movement. The methods have been used for functionally determining hip joint centre in gait analysis and have revealed advantages compared to predictive regression techniques. However, the current implementation of functional methods hinders its application in clinical use when subjects have difficulties performing multi-plane movements over the required range. In this study, we systematically investigated whether functional methods can be used to localise the CoR during a quasi-planar movement. The effects of the following factors were analysed: the algorithms, the range and speed of the movement, marker cluster location, marker cluster size and distance to the joint centre. A mechanical linkage was used in our study to isolate the factors of interest and give insight to variation in implementation of functional methods. Our results showed the algorithms and cluster locations significantly affected the estimate results. For all algorithms, a significantly positive relationship between CoR errors and the distance of proximal cluster coordinate location to the joint centre along the medial-lateral direction was observed while the distal marker clusters were best located as close as possible to the joint centre. By optimising the analytical and experimental factors, the transformation algorithms achieved a root mean square error (RMSE) of 5.3 mm while the sphere fitting methods yielded the best estimation with an RMSE of 2.6 mm. The transformation algorithms performed better in presence of random noise and simulated soft tissue artefacts.
LanguageEnglish
Article numbere0210807
Number of pages14
JournalPLOS One
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Mean square error
Gait analysis
methodology
Hip Joint
Gait
Artifacts
gait
hips
Tissue
Direction compound
tissues

Keywords

  • centre of rotation
  • hip joint centre
  • gait analysis
  • quasi-planar movement

Cite this

@article{4321a92dd9ee4eb88f467fe555220bee,
title = "Evaluation of functional methods of joint centre determination for quasi-planar movement",
abstract = "Functional methods identify joint centres as the centre of rotation (CoR) of twoadjacent movements during an ad-hoc movement. The methods have been used for functionally determining hip joint centre in gait analysis and have revealed advantages compared to predictive regression techniques. However, the current implementation of functional methods hinders its application in clinical use when subjects have difficulties performing multi-plane movements over the required range. In this study, we systematically investigated whether functional methods can be used to localise the CoR during a quasi-planar movement. The effects of the following factors were analysed: the algorithms, the range and speed of the movement, marker cluster location, marker cluster size and distance to the joint centre. A mechanical linkage was used in our study to isolate the factors of interest and give insight to variation in implementation of functional methods. Our results showed the algorithms and cluster locations significantly affected the estimate results. For all algorithms, a significantly positive relationship between CoR errors and the distance of proximal cluster coordinate location to the joint centre along the medial-lateral direction was observed while the distal marker clusters were best located as close as possible to the joint centre. By optimising the analytical and experimental factors, the transformation algorithms achieved a root mean square error (RMSE) of 5.3 mm while the sphere fitting methods yielded the best estimation with an RMSE of 2.6 mm. The transformation algorithms performed better in presence of random noise and simulated soft tissue artefacts.",
keywords = "centre of rotation, hip joint centre, gait analysis, quasi-planar movement",
author = "Lin Meng and Craig Childs and Arjan Buis",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0210807",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "PLOS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "1",

}

Evaluation of functional methods of joint centre determination for quasi-planar movement. / Meng, Lin; Childs, Craig; Buis, Arjan.

In: PLOS One, Vol. 14, No. 1, e0210807, 17.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of functional methods of joint centre determination for quasi-planar movement

AU - Meng, Lin

AU - Childs, Craig

AU - Buis, Arjan

PY - 2019/1/17

Y1 - 2019/1/17

N2 - Functional methods identify joint centres as the centre of rotation (CoR) of twoadjacent movements during an ad-hoc movement. The methods have been used for functionally determining hip joint centre in gait analysis and have revealed advantages compared to predictive regression techniques. However, the current implementation of functional methods hinders its application in clinical use when subjects have difficulties performing multi-plane movements over the required range. In this study, we systematically investigated whether functional methods can be used to localise the CoR during a quasi-planar movement. The effects of the following factors were analysed: the algorithms, the range and speed of the movement, marker cluster location, marker cluster size and distance to the joint centre. A mechanical linkage was used in our study to isolate the factors of interest and give insight to variation in implementation of functional methods. Our results showed the algorithms and cluster locations significantly affected the estimate results. For all algorithms, a significantly positive relationship between CoR errors and the distance of proximal cluster coordinate location to the joint centre along the medial-lateral direction was observed while the distal marker clusters were best located as close as possible to the joint centre. By optimising the analytical and experimental factors, the transformation algorithms achieved a root mean square error (RMSE) of 5.3 mm while the sphere fitting methods yielded the best estimation with an RMSE of 2.6 mm. The transformation algorithms performed better in presence of random noise and simulated soft tissue artefacts.

AB - Functional methods identify joint centres as the centre of rotation (CoR) of twoadjacent movements during an ad-hoc movement. The methods have been used for functionally determining hip joint centre in gait analysis and have revealed advantages compared to predictive regression techniques. However, the current implementation of functional methods hinders its application in clinical use when subjects have difficulties performing multi-plane movements over the required range. In this study, we systematically investigated whether functional methods can be used to localise the CoR during a quasi-planar movement. The effects of the following factors were analysed: the algorithms, the range and speed of the movement, marker cluster location, marker cluster size and distance to the joint centre. A mechanical linkage was used in our study to isolate the factors of interest and give insight to variation in implementation of functional methods. Our results showed the algorithms and cluster locations significantly affected the estimate results. For all algorithms, a significantly positive relationship between CoR errors and the distance of proximal cluster coordinate location to the joint centre along the medial-lateral direction was observed while the distal marker clusters were best located as close as possible to the joint centre. By optimising the analytical and experimental factors, the transformation algorithms achieved a root mean square error (RMSE) of 5.3 mm while the sphere fitting methods yielded the best estimation with an RMSE of 2.6 mm. The transformation algorithms performed better in presence of random noise and simulated soft tissue artefacts.

KW - centre of rotation

KW - hip joint centre

KW - gait analysis

KW - quasi-planar movement

UR - https://journals.plos.org/plosone/

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0210807

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0210807

M3 - Article

VL - 14

JO - PLOS One

T2 - PLOS One

JF - PLOS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 1

M1 - e0210807

ER -