Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evaluation of detection performance and cost-effectiveness of IDEXX Colilert-18 and ChromAgar for environmental surveillance of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase Escherichia coli in water samples from urban marketplaces in Blantyre, Malawi

  • Effita Fifi Masoamphambe
  • , Jones Chipinga
  • , Madalitso Mphasa
  • , Kondwani Chidziwitsano
  • , Mindy Panulo
  • , James Jafali
  • , Nicholas Feasey
  • , David Berendes
  • , Amy Kirby
  • , Tracy Morse
  • , Derek Cocker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In sub-Saharan Africa, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacterial infections pose significant public health risks. The importance of ESBL transmission within the food chain, as well as the role of urban marketplaces in this relationship, is becoming increasingly recognized. ESBL Escherichia coli also represents a key indicator organism within global antimicrobial resistance surveillance strategies, including the World Health Organization Tricycle protocol. Therefore, evaluating simple, cost-effective, and scalable detection methods for ESBL-producing E. coli is crucial. In 2021, a modified Colilert-18 method and a conventional ChromAgar ESBL culture method were assessed for the detection of ESBL E. coli in water samples from four urban marketplaces in Blantyre, Malawi. ESBL E. coli were detected in water samples obtained from urban marketplaces using both ChromAgar ESBL culture (39% [n = 65/167]) and IDEXX Colilert-18 methods (76% [n = 127/167]). Using ChromAgar ESBL as a reference standard, the modified Colilert-18 method showed a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 30%. Agreement between the methods was low (Cohen’s kappa = 0.141, P < 0.001). The cost per test was lower for Colilert than for ChromAgar, indicating potential cost-effectiveness in primary ESBL E. coli detection. At the time of sampling, water collected from urban marketplaces was contaminated with ESBL E. coli, posing possible public health risks. Both the ChromAgar method and the modified IDEXX method offer valuable tools for microbiological surveillance of ESBL E. coli in urban markets. However, further studies must be conducted to optimize their use and determine additional considerations to factor into cost-effectiveness.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages5
JournalMicrobiology Spectrum
Early online date20 May 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 May 2026

Funding

This study was conducted under the Drivers of Resistance in Uganda and Malawi consortium, funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MR/R015074/1 and MR/S004793/1). The funder had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or manuscript writing.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation
    SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation

Keywords

  • ESBL
  • E.coli
  • antimicrobial resistance
  • environmental surveillance
  • cost-effectiveness
  • marketplaces
  • Malawi

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of detection performance and cost-effectiveness of IDEXX Colilert-18 and ChromAgar for environmental surveillance of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase Escherichia coli in water samples from urban marketplaces in Blantyre, Malawi'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this