Evaluation of a contemporary CADCAM system

T. McGarry, B.F. McHugh

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy of the TracerCAD system in measuring a model of known dimensions and volumes. A cylindrical nylon 6.6 model was prepared. Landmarks were added to indicate proximal, distal, anterior, medial and lateral. Four additional landmarks were added at regular intervals along the length of the cylinder with a view to calculating diameters and volumes relative to these landmarks. The model was measured using a comparator with guaranteed accuracy to one hundredth of a millimetre, and was traced using the TracerCAD system (test 1) The test was repeated with the model rotated by 90 degrees (test 2), to determine whether there were any effects related to the orientation of the model in relation to the transmitter. The difference in average volume between measured results and TracerCAD scans was between 0.20% and -1.96%. Individual trace volumes varied between -0.0085% and -4.50 %. In all volumes measured in tests 1 and 2, all maximum volume percentage differences measured greater than 3%.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages221-229
    Number of pages8
    JournalProsthetics and Orthotics International
    Volume29
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 2005

    Fingerprint

    Nylons

    Keywords

    • tracerCAD system
    • dimensions
    • volumes
    • proximal
    • distal
    • anterior
    • medial
    • lateral
    • landmarks
    • CADCAM

    Cite this

    @article{e4da29ad353045eda852f0482435c3b4,
    title = "Evaluation of a contemporary CADCAM system",
    abstract = "The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy of the TracerCAD system in measuring a model of known dimensions and volumes. A cylindrical nylon 6.6 model was prepared. Landmarks were added to indicate proximal, distal, anterior, medial and lateral. Four additional landmarks were added at regular intervals along the length of the cylinder with a view to calculating diameters and volumes relative to these landmarks. The model was measured using a comparator with guaranteed accuracy to one hundredth of a millimetre, and was traced using the TracerCAD system (test 1) The test was repeated with the model rotated by 90 degrees (test 2), to determine whether there were any effects related to the orientation of the model in relation to the transmitter. The difference in average volume between measured results and TracerCAD scans was between 0.20{\%} and -1.96{\%}. Individual trace volumes varied between -0.0085{\%} and -4.50 {\%}. In all volumes measured in tests 1 and 2, all maximum volume percentage differences measured greater than 3{\%}.",
    keywords = "tracerCAD system, dimensions, volumes, proximal, distal, anterior, medial, lateral, landmarks, CADCAM",
    author = "T. McGarry and B.F. McHugh",
    year = "2005",
    language = "English",
    volume = "29",
    pages = "221--229",
    journal = "Prosthetics and Orthotics International",
    issn = "0309-3646",
    number = "3",

    }

    Evaluation of a contemporary CADCAM system. / McGarry, T.; McHugh, B.F.

    In: Prosthetics and Orthotics International, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2005, p. 221-229.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Evaluation of a contemporary CADCAM system

    AU - McGarry, T.

    AU - McHugh, B.F.

    PY - 2005

    Y1 - 2005

    N2 - The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy of the TracerCAD system in measuring a model of known dimensions and volumes. A cylindrical nylon 6.6 model was prepared. Landmarks were added to indicate proximal, distal, anterior, medial and lateral. Four additional landmarks were added at regular intervals along the length of the cylinder with a view to calculating diameters and volumes relative to these landmarks. The model was measured using a comparator with guaranteed accuracy to one hundredth of a millimetre, and was traced using the TracerCAD system (test 1) The test was repeated with the model rotated by 90 degrees (test 2), to determine whether there were any effects related to the orientation of the model in relation to the transmitter. The difference in average volume between measured results and TracerCAD scans was between 0.20% and -1.96%. Individual trace volumes varied between -0.0085% and -4.50 %. In all volumes measured in tests 1 and 2, all maximum volume percentage differences measured greater than 3%.

    AB - The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy of the TracerCAD system in measuring a model of known dimensions and volumes. A cylindrical nylon 6.6 model was prepared. Landmarks were added to indicate proximal, distal, anterior, medial and lateral. Four additional landmarks were added at regular intervals along the length of the cylinder with a view to calculating diameters and volumes relative to these landmarks. The model was measured using a comparator with guaranteed accuracy to one hundredth of a millimetre, and was traced using the TracerCAD system (test 1) The test was repeated with the model rotated by 90 degrees (test 2), to determine whether there were any effects related to the orientation of the model in relation to the transmitter. The difference in average volume between measured results and TracerCAD scans was between 0.20% and -1.96%. Individual trace volumes varied between -0.0085% and -4.50 %. In all volumes measured in tests 1 and 2, all maximum volume percentage differences measured greater than 3%.

    KW - tracerCAD system

    KW - dimensions

    KW - volumes

    KW - proximal

    KW - distal

    KW - anterior

    KW - medial

    KW - lateral

    KW - landmarks

    KW - CADCAM

    UR - http://www.ispoweb.org/

    M3 - Article

    VL - 29

    SP - 221

    EP - 229

    JO - Prosthetics and Orthotics International

    T2 - Prosthetics and Orthotics International

    JF - Prosthetics and Orthotics International

    SN - 0309-3646

    IS - 3

    ER -