Evaluation of a bioprinted 3D airway tissue model for toxicity testing of nanomaterials; pathway to integration into a tiered testing strategy for hazard assessment to support safety-by-design

Yunji Lee, Katie McAllister, Hwa-Rim Lee, Sungjune Jung, Fiona Murphy*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There is an urgent need to identify hazards posed by novel nanomaterials (NMs), however, new models are required to streamline testing approaches, increase our understanding of mechanism of toxicity and incorporate Safer-by-Design concepts into NM development. Here, we conducted an evaluation of a sophisticated 3D bioprinted airway model for a first-in-kind hazard assessment of NMs. Exploiting the consistency and reproducibility provided by bioprinting techniques, airway constructs were generated by precisely controlled sequential layering of endothelial cells, fibroblasts embedded in collagen, and bronchial epithelial cells and exposed to ZnO and BaSO4 NMs case-study materials. Exposure to ZnO resulted in greater temporal and dynamic immunotoxic and histological responses in contrast to BaSO4, demonstrating the successful differentiation of high and low reactivity NMs. Comparison with simple in vitro toxicity studies and existing in vivo and human data demonstrated the physiological relevance of increasing model complexity. The relative benefits of the 3D bioprinted airway model and potential for inclusion in tiered testing strategies was substantiated by comprehensive review of the current state-of-the-art alternative models. This study supports the wider adoption of a sophisticated in vitro airway model to reduce our reliance on in vivo testing and advance efforts to develop Integrated Approaches to Assessment and Testing to support Safer-by-Design NM innovation.
Original languageEnglish
Article number102655
Number of pages13
JournalNano Today
Volume61
Early online date3 Feb 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2025

Funding

This study was supported by the Royal Society of Edinburgh SAPHIRE fund (2895) and the National Research Foundation of Korea Grants (NRF-2022R1A2C2012272)

Keywords

  • bioprinted 3D tissue models
  • nanomaterial hazard assessment
  • in vitro alternatives
  • safer-by-design

Cite this