Evaluating the impact of energy interventions: home audits vs. community events

Michelle Grace Scott, Alaric McCarthy, Rebecca Ford, Janet Stephenson, Seth Gorrie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

New Zealand’s housing stock tends to be of low thermal quality that can adversely affect the health and well-being of occupants as well as costing more than necessary to heat. Householders need information and motivation to make material changes and adopt new practices to achieve warmer and more energy-efficient homes. This study compares two different types of energy interventions with householders in three different suburbs in Dunedin, New Zealand. Two suburbs received a home energy audit whereby an auditor surveyed each house and provided personalised advice. Householders in the third suburb took part in community energy events that included general advice and practical workshops. The impacts of these interventions were evaluated through pre- and post-intervention surveys and post-intervention interviews. Home energy audits were successful in encouraging change both behavioural and practical, where it was possible. The energy events promoted community engagement and awareness relating to energy-saving actions. Participant feedback suggests that a combination of both types of intervention may be most effective in promoting household change, beginning with energy events in communities before offering home energy audits. This would enable people to share their thoughts and concerns about energy with the support of their social networks and engender trust in the process, before offering personalised audits. Overall, the results show that interventions need to be correctly targeted to appropriate communities to be effective.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1221–1240
Number of pages20
JournalEnergy Efficiency
Volume9
Issue number6
Early online date9 Jan 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2016

Fingerprint

Energy conservation
Health
Feedback
Hot Temperature

Keywords

  • energy
  • housing
  • intervention
  • home energy audit
  • community events
  • behaviour change

Cite this

Scott, Michelle Grace ; McCarthy, Alaric ; Ford, Rebecca ; Stephenson, Janet ; Gorrie, Seth. / Evaluating the impact of energy interventions : home audits vs. community events. In: Energy Efficiency. 2016 ; Vol. 9, No. 6. pp. 1221–1240.
@article{8244d382ca1f4286a5b67748a2d7f354,
title = "Evaluating the impact of energy interventions: home audits vs. community events",
abstract = "New Zealand’s housing stock tends to be of low thermal quality that can adversely affect the health and well-being of occupants as well as costing more than necessary to heat. Householders need information and motivation to make material changes and adopt new practices to achieve warmer and more energy-efficient homes. This study compares two different types of energy interventions with householders in three different suburbs in Dunedin, New Zealand. Two suburbs received a home energy audit whereby an auditor surveyed each house and provided personalised advice. Householders in the third suburb took part in community energy events that included general advice and practical workshops. The impacts of these interventions were evaluated through pre- and post-intervention surveys and post-intervention interviews. Home energy audits were successful in encouraging change both behavioural and practical, where it was possible. The energy events promoted community engagement and awareness relating to energy-saving actions. Participant feedback suggests that a combination of both types of intervention may be most effective in promoting household change, beginning with energy events in communities before offering home energy audits. This would enable people to share their thoughts and concerns about energy with the support of their social networks and engender trust in the process, before offering personalised audits. Overall, the results show that interventions need to be correctly targeted to appropriate communities to be effective.",
keywords = "energy, housing, intervention, home energy audit, community events, behaviour change",
author = "Scott, {Michelle Grace} and Alaric McCarthy and Rebecca Ford and Janet Stephenson and Seth Gorrie",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1007/s12053-015-9420-9",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "1221–1240",
journal = "Energy Efficiency",
issn = "1570-646X",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "6",

}

Evaluating the impact of energy interventions : home audits vs. community events. / Scott, Michelle Grace; McCarthy, Alaric; Ford, Rebecca; Stephenson, Janet; Gorrie, Seth.

In: Energy Efficiency, Vol. 9, No. 6, 31.12.2016, p. 1221–1240.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the impact of energy interventions

T2 - Energy Efficiency

AU - Scott, Michelle Grace

AU - McCarthy, Alaric

AU - Ford, Rebecca

AU - Stephenson, Janet

AU - Gorrie, Seth

PY - 2016/12/31

Y1 - 2016/12/31

N2 - New Zealand’s housing stock tends to be of low thermal quality that can adversely affect the health and well-being of occupants as well as costing more than necessary to heat. Householders need information and motivation to make material changes and adopt new practices to achieve warmer and more energy-efficient homes. This study compares two different types of energy interventions with householders in three different suburbs in Dunedin, New Zealand. Two suburbs received a home energy audit whereby an auditor surveyed each house and provided personalised advice. Householders in the third suburb took part in community energy events that included general advice and practical workshops. The impacts of these interventions were evaluated through pre- and post-intervention surveys and post-intervention interviews. Home energy audits were successful in encouraging change both behavioural and practical, where it was possible. The energy events promoted community engagement and awareness relating to energy-saving actions. Participant feedback suggests that a combination of both types of intervention may be most effective in promoting household change, beginning with energy events in communities before offering home energy audits. This would enable people to share their thoughts and concerns about energy with the support of their social networks and engender trust in the process, before offering personalised audits. Overall, the results show that interventions need to be correctly targeted to appropriate communities to be effective.

AB - New Zealand’s housing stock tends to be of low thermal quality that can adversely affect the health and well-being of occupants as well as costing more than necessary to heat. Householders need information and motivation to make material changes and adopt new practices to achieve warmer and more energy-efficient homes. This study compares two different types of energy interventions with householders in three different suburbs in Dunedin, New Zealand. Two suburbs received a home energy audit whereby an auditor surveyed each house and provided personalised advice. Householders in the third suburb took part in community energy events that included general advice and practical workshops. The impacts of these interventions were evaluated through pre- and post-intervention surveys and post-intervention interviews. Home energy audits were successful in encouraging change both behavioural and practical, where it was possible. The energy events promoted community engagement and awareness relating to energy-saving actions. Participant feedback suggests that a combination of both types of intervention may be most effective in promoting household change, beginning with energy events in communities before offering home energy audits. This would enable people to share their thoughts and concerns about energy with the support of their social networks and engender trust in the process, before offering personalised audits. Overall, the results show that interventions need to be correctly targeted to appropriate communities to be effective.

KW - energy

KW - housing

KW - intervention

KW - home energy audit

KW - community events

KW - behaviour change

U2 - 10.1007/s12053-015-9420-9

DO - 10.1007/s12053-015-9420-9

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 1221

EP - 1240

JO - Energy Efficiency

JF - Energy Efficiency

SN - 1570-646X

IS - 6

ER -