Evaluating tangible and multisensory museum visiting experiences: lessons learned from the meSch project

Areti Damala, Merel van der Vaart, Loraine Clarke, Eva Hornecker, Gabriela Avram, Hub Kockelkorn, Ian Ruthven

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

This paper explores the potential of tangible and embodied interaction for encouraging a multisensory engagement with museum objects and artefacts on display, by means of focusing on the subtleties of devising and planning for evaluation and audience research. Measuring the impact of new technologies is one of the main challenges identified in the 2015 NMC Horizon report (Museum Edition). The challenge is even greater for emerging concepts, technologies, and approaches, such as the use of tangible and embodied interaction in museums and other Cultural Heritage settings. Taking as an example two case-studies from the EU meSch project, from Museon and Allard Pierson Museum in the Netherlands, we discuss our plan for devising and carrying out audience research so as to “document,” analyse, and interpret the impact of digitally enhanced, tangible, embodied, and multisensory museum visiting experiences. Our intention is to provide an honest account of the different strengths and weaknesses encountered for all evaluation methodologies that were used, namely observations, interviews, video data, questionnaires, meaning maps, and post-visit interviews. We also share and discuss lessons learned, insights and best practices that could be of benefit for museum and audience research professionals.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-18
Number of pages18
Publication statusPublished - 6 Apr 2016
EventMuseums and the Web 2016 - Los Angeles, United States
Duration: 6 Apr 20169 Apr 2016

Conference

ConferenceMuseums and the Web 2016
CountryUnited States
CityLos Angeles
Period6/04/169/04/16

Fingerprint

Museums
Display devices
Planning

Keywords

  • museum
  • interaction design
  • evaluation
  • embodied interaction
  • tangible interaction
  • multisensoriality
  • audience research

Cite this

Damala, A., van der Vaart, M., Clarke, L., Hornecker, E., Avram, G., Kockelkorn, H., & Ruthven, I. (2016). Evaluating tangible and multisensory museum visiting experiences: lessons learned from the meSch project. 1-18. Paper presented at Museums and the Web 2016, Los Angeles, United States.
Damala, Areti ; van der Vaart, Merel ; Clarke, Loraine ; Hornecker, Eva ; Avram, Gabriela ; Kockelkorn, Hub ; Ruthven, Ian. / Evaluating tangible and multisensory museum visiting experiences : lessons learned from the meSch project. Paper presented at Museums and the Web 2016, Los Angeles, United States.18 p.
@conference{1f91d09c879445a99a207ae36b57565d,
title = "Evaluating tangible and multisensory museum visiting experiences: lessons learned from the meSch project",
abstract = "This paper explores the potential of tangible and embodied interaction for encouraging a multisensory engagement with museum objects and artefacts on display, by means of focusing on the subtleties of devising and planning for evaluation and audience research. Measuring the impact of new technologies is one of the main challenges identified in the 2015 NMC Horizon report (Museum Edition). The challenge is even greater for emerging concepts, technologies, and approaches, such as the use of tangible and embodied interaction in museums and other Cultural Heritage settings. Taking as an example two case-studies from the EU meSch project, from Museon and Allard Pierson Museum in the Netherlands, we discuss our plan for devising and carrying out audience research so as to “document,” analyse, and interpret the impact of digitally enhanced, tangible, embodied, and multisensory museum visiting experiences. Our intention is to provide an honest account of the different strengths and weaknesses encountered for all evaluation methodologies that were used, namely observations, interviews, video data, questionnaires, meaning maps, and post-visit interviews. We also share and discuss lessons learned, insights and best practices that could be of benefit for museum and audience research professionals.",
keywords = "museum, interaction design, evaluation, embodied interaction, tangible interaction , multisensoriality, audience research",
author = "Areti Damala and {van der Vaart}, Merel and Loraine Clarke and Eva Hornecker and Gabriela Avram and Hub Kockelkorn and Ian Ruthven",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "6",
language = "English",
pages = "1--18",
note = "Museums and the Web 2016 ; Conference date: 06-04-2016 Through 09-04-2016",

}

Damala, A, van der Vaart, M, Clarke, L, Hornecker, E, Avram, G, Kockelkorn, H & Ruthven, I 2016, 'Evaluating tangible and multisensory museum visiting experiences: lessons learned from the meSch project' Paper presented at Museums and the Web 2016, Los Angeles, United States, 6/04/16 - 9/04/16, pp. 1-18.

Evaluating tangible and multisensory museum visiting experiences : lessons learned from the meSch project. / Damala, Areti; van der Vaart, Merel; Clarke, Loraine; Hornecker, Eva; Avram, Gabriela; Kockelkorn, Hub; Ruthven, Ian.

2016. 1-18 Paper presented at Museums and the Web 2016, Los Angeles, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - Evaluating tangible and multisensory museum visiting experiences

T2 - lessons learned from the meSch project

AU - Damala, Areti

AU - van der Vaart, Merel

AU - Clarke, Loraine

AU - Hornecker, Eva

AU - Avram, Gabriela

AU - Kockelkorn, Hub

AU - Ruthven, Ian

PY - 2016/4/6

Y1 - 2016/4/6

N2 - This paper explores the potential of tangible and embodied interaction for encouraging a multisensory engagement with museum objects and artefacts on display, by means of focusing on the subtleties of devising and planning for evaluation and audience research. Measuring the impact of new technologies is one of the main challenges identified in the 2015 NMC Horizon report (Museum Edition). The challenge is even greater for emerging concepts, technologies, and approaches, such as the use of tangible and embodied interaction in museums and other Cultural Heritage settings. Taking as an example two case-studies from the EU meSch project, from Museon and Allard Pierson Museum in the Netherlands, we discuss our plan for devising and carrying out audience research so as to “document,” analyse, and interpret the impact of digitally enhanced, tangible, embodied, and multisensory museum visiting experiences. Our intention is to provide an honest account of the different strengths and weaknesses encountered for all evaluation methodologies that were used, namely observations, interviews, video data, questionnaires, meaning maps, and post-visit interviews. We also share and discuss lessons learned, insights and best practices that could be of benefit for museum and audience research professionals.

AB - This paper explores the potential of tangible and embodied interaction for encouraging a multisensory engagement with museum objects and artefacts on display, by means of focusing on the subtleties of devising and planning for evaluation and audience research. Measuring the impact of new technologies is one of the main challenges identified in the 2015 NMC Horizon report (Museum Edition). The challenge is even greater for emerging concepts, technologies, and approaches, such as the use of tangible and embodied interaction in museums and other Cultural Heritage settings. Taking as an example two case-studies from the EU meSch project, from Museon and Allard Pierson Museum in the Netherlands, we discuss our plan for devising and carrying out audience research so as to “document,” analyse, and interpret the impact of digitally enhanced, tangible, embodied, and multisensory museum visiting experiences. Our intention is to provide an honest account of the different strengths and weaknesses encountered for all evaluation methodologies that were used, namely observations, interviews, video data, questionnaires, meaning maps, and post-visit interviews. We also share and discuss lessons learned, insights and best practices that could be of benefit for museum and audience research professionals.

KW - museum

KW - interaction design

KW - evaluation

KW - embodied interaction

KW - tangible interaction

KW - multisensoriality

KW - audience research

M3 - Paper

SP - 1

EP - 18

ER -

Damala A, van der Vaart M, Clarke L, Hornecker E, Avram G, Kockelkorn H et al. Evaluating tangible and multisensory museum visiting experiences: lessons learned from the meSch project. 2016. Paper presented at Museums and the Web 2016, Los Angeles, United States.