Evaluating democratic governance: a bottom up approach to European Union enlargement

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To be admitted to the European Union (EU), an applicant country is expected to meet five conditions for democratic governance set out in the EU's Copenhagen criteria. The first section compares the EU's criteria with alternative criteria of democracy and of governance. Secondly, the article uses New Europe Barometer sample surveys to demonstrate how the bottom-up evaluation of governance by a country's citizens can complement top-down evaluations by external institutions. Evaluations by citizens of Bulgaria, Croatia, Romania, and Ukraine are compared with those of citizens in eight post-communist countries admitted to the EU in 2004. Factor analysis demonstrates that, unlike democracy indexes, democratic governance is a multi-dimensional concept. Citizens characterize their system of democratic governance as acceptable on some criteria but not on others. Taken singly, each Copenhagen criterion can be a tool for diagnosing an area of weakness in democratic governance. However, political pressures lead policymakers to lower demands for improving governance as a deadline approach for deciding whether or not to admit an applicant country to the European Union.
LanguageEnglish
Pages251-271
Number of pages20
JournalDemocratization
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

bottom-up approach
European Union
governance
democracy
citizen
applicant
factor analysis
EU
evaluation
Bulgaria
Ukraine
Romania
Croatia

Keywords

  • European Union
  • governance
  • democracy
  • survey
  • Copenhagen criteria

Cite this

@article{f604cfac82624252b7332a50611267d4,
title = "Evaluating democratic governance: a bottom up approach to European Union enlargement",
abstract = "To be admitted to the European Union (EU), an applicant country is expected to meet five conditions for democratic governance set out in the EU's Copenhagen criteria. The first section compares the EU's criteria with alternative criteria of democracy and of governance. Secondly, the article uses New Europe Barometer sample surveys to demonstrate how the bottom-up evaluation of governance by a country's citizens can complement top-down evaluations by external institutions. Evaluations by citizens of Bulgaria, Croatia, Romania, and Ukraine are compared with those of citizens in eight post-communist countries admitted to the EU in 2004. Factor analysis demonstrates that, unlike democracy indexes, democratic governance is a multi-dimensional concept. Citizens characterize their system of democratic governance as acceptable on some criteria but not on others. Taken singly, each Copenhagen criterion can be a tool for diagnosing an area of weakness in democratic governance. However, political pressures lead policymakers to lower demands for improving governance as a deadline approach for deciding whether or not to admit an applicant country to the European Union.",
keywords = "European Union, governance, democracy, survey, Copenhagen criteria",
author = "Richard Rose",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1080/13510340701846327",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "251--271",
journal = "Democratization",
issn = "1351-0347",
number = "2",

}

Evaluating democratic governance : a bottom up approach to European Union enlargement. / Rose, Richard.

In: Democratization, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2008, p. 251-271.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating democratic governance

T2 - Democratization

AU - Rose, Richard

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - To be admitted to the European Union (EU), an applicant country is expected to meet five conditions for democratic governance set out in the EU's Copenhagen criteria. The first section compares the EU's criteria with alternative criteria of democracy and of governance. Secondly, the article uses New Europe Barometer sample surveys to demonstrate how the bottom-up evaluation of governance by a country's citizens can complement top-down evaluations by external institutions. Evaluations by citizens of Bulgaria, Croatia, Romania, and Ukraine are compared with those of citizens in eight post-communist countries admitted to the EU in 2004. Factor analysis demonstrates that, unlike democracy indexes, democratic governance is a multi-dimensional concept. Citizens characterize their system of democratic governance as acceptable on some criteria but not on others. Taken singly, each Copenhagen criterion can be a tool for diagnosing an area of weakness in democratic governance. However, political pressures lead policymakers to lower demands for improving governance as a deadline approach for deciding whether or not to admit an applicant country to the European Union.

AB - To be admitted to the European Union (EU), an applicant country is expected to meet five conditions for democratic governance set out in the EU's Copenhagen criteria. The first section compares the EU's criteria with alternative criteria of democracy and of governance. Secondly, the article uses New Europe Barometer sample surveys to demonstrate how the bottom-up evaluation of governance by a country's citizens can complement top-down evaluations by external institutions. Evaluations by citizens of Bulgaria, Croatia, Romania, and Ukraine are compared with those of citizens in eight post-communist countries admitted to the EU in 2004. Factor analysis demonstrates that, unlike democracy indexes, democratic governance is a multi-dimensional concept. Citizens characterize their system of democratic governance as acceptable on some criteria but not on others. Taken singly, each Copenhagen criterion can be a tool for diagnosing an area of weakness in democratic governance. However, political pressures lead policymakers to lower demands for improving governance as a deadline approach for deciding whether or not to admit an applicant country to the European Union.

KW - European Union

KW - governance

KW - democracy

KW - survey

KW - Copenhagen criteria

U2 - 10.1080/13510340701846327

DO - 10.1080/13510340701846327

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 251

EP - 271

JO - Democratization

JF - Democratization

SN - 1351-0347

IS - 2

ER -