European research on group decision support systems

Introduction to the special issue

F. Ackermann, G.J. de Vreede

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Group Decision Support Systems have been around for nearly two decades now, and have made considerable strides since the original systems back in the early 80's, being used in numerous organizations for a wealth of different purposes. As they have developed, through both laboratory experiments and field studies we have seen them used in different contexts,and situations and consequently have seen the development of a number of 'strands' or'directions' being taken. Initially these emphases could be detected in the origins of the work. For example, in the US, a large proportion has taken a fairly technical focus stemming from their development springing from Information Systems/Computer Science backgrounds - and due to the traditions of that academic community largely comprised positivist research. In Europe however, the emphasis has been more on taking a socio-political perspective and working in organizations and along with researchers adopting predominantly interpretivist methodologies. Neither of these is better than one another, both giving rise to interesting and useful insights, and enriching the field. Moreover, in the last few years we have seen the two 'schools' come together more, as each has taken on board particular aspects of the other - resulting in 'hybrids' that potentially outperform those systems developed in either tradition.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-4
Number of pages4
JournalGroup Decision and Negotiation
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2001

Fingerprint

group decision
Decision support systems
Computer science
Information systems
laboratory experiment
computer science
information system
Experiments
methodology
school
community
Group decision support systems
Proportion
Laboratory experiments
Wealth
Field study
Methodology

Keywords

  • decision support sustems
  • decision making
  • management theory
  • negotiation

Cite this

@article{99528144c04a4a18aa3eb509f60a5133,
title = "European research on group decision support systems: Introduction to the special issue",
abstract = "Group Decision Support Systems have been around for nearly two decades now, and have made considerable strides since the original systems back in the early 80's, being used in numerous organizations for a wealth of different purposes. As they have developed, through both laboratory experiments and field studies we have seen them used in different contexts,and situations and consequently have seen the development of a number of 'strands' or'directions' being taken. Initially these emphases could be detected in the origins of the work. For example, in the US, a large proportion has taken a fairly technical focus stemming from their development springing from Information Systems/Computer Science backgrounds - and due to the traditions of that academic community largely comprised positivist research. In Europe however, the emphasis has been more on taking a socio-political perspective and working in organizations and along with researchers adopting predominantly interpretivist methodologies. Neither of these is better than one another, both giving rise to interesting and useful insights, and enriching the field. Moreover, in the last few years we have seen the two 'schools' come together more, as each has taken on board particular aspects of the other - resulting in 'hybrids' that potentially outperform those systems developed in either tradition.",
keywords = "decision support sustems, decision making, management theory, negotiation",
author = "F. Ackermann and {de Vreede}, G.J.",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1023/A:1008792126161",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "1--4",
journal = "Group Decision and Negotiation",
issn = "0926-2644",
number = "1",

}

European research on group decision support systems : Introduction to the special issue. / Ackermann, F.; de Vreede, G.J.

In: Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol. 10, No. 1, 01.2001, p. 1-4.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - European research on group decision support systems

T2 - Introduction to the special issue

AU - Ackermann, F.

AU - de Vreede, G.J.

PY - 2001/1

Y1 - 2001/1

N2 - Group Decision Support Systems have been around for nearly two decades now, and have made considerable strides since the original systems back in the early 80's, being used in numerous organizations for a wealth of different purposes. As they have developed, through both laboratory experiments and field studies we have seen them used in different contexts,and situations and consequently have seen the development of a number of 'strands' or'directions' being taken. Initially these emphases could be detected in the origins of the work. For example, in the US, a large proportion has taken a fairly technical focus stemming from their development springing from Information Systems/Computer Science backgrounds - and due to the traditions of that academic community largely comprised positivist research. In Europe however, the emphasis has been more on taking a socio-political perspective and working in organizations and along with researchers adopting predominantly interpretivist methodologies. Neither of these is better than one another, both giving rise to interesting and useful insights, and enriching the field. Moreover, in the last few years we have seen the two 'schools' come together more, as each has taken on board particular aspects of the other - resulting in 'hybrids' that potentially outperform those systems developed in either tradition.

AB - Group Decision Support Systems have been around for nearly two decades now, and have made considerable strides since the original systems back in the early 80's, being used in numerous organizations for a wealth of different purposes. As they have developed, through both laboratory experiments and field studies we have seen them used in different contexts,and situations and consequently have seen the development of a number of 'strands' or'directions' being taken. Initially these emphases could be detected in the origins of the work. For example, in the US, a large proportion has taken a fairly technical focus stemming from their development springing from Information Systems/Computer Science backgrounds - and due to the traditions of that academic community largely comprised positivist research. In Europe however, the emphasis has been more on taking a socio-political perspective and working in organizations and along with researchers adopting predominantly interpretivist methodologies. Neither of these is better than one another, both giving rise to interesting and useful insights, and enriching the field. Moreover, in the last few years we have seen the two 'schools' come together more, as each has taken on board particular aspects of the other - resulting in 'hybrids' that potentially outperform those systems developed in either tradition.

KW - decision support sustems

KW - decision making

KW - management theory

KW - negotiation

U2 - 10.1023/A:1008792126161

DO - 10.1023/A:1008792126161

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 1

EP - 4

JO - Group Decision and Negotiation

JF - Group Decision and Negotiation

SN - 0926-2644

IS - 1

ER -