European labour law in crisis: the demise of social rights

Nicole Busby, Rebecca Zahn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Syrpis and Novitz have argued that ‘the choices which the Court has made in the Viking and Laval cases represent a tipping of the delicate balance between economic and social rights in favour of the former.’ ([2008] ELR 411). The Court of Justice’s (CoJ) judgments which led to a prolonged sense of crisis in European Labour Law came at a time when increasing emphasis was already being put on soft law mechanisms at EU level to achieve harmonisation across national employment policies in place of hard law regulation. In applying the CoJ’s decision in Laval, the Swedish labour court contributed to this sense of crisis by going beyond what was necessary to comply with the decision much to the detriment of national trade unions. Overall, there is little enthusiasm at national or European levels to develop further the provision and application of social rights within the employment context. This paper considers whether the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty in 2009 which gives legal effect to the Charter of Fundamental Rights provides new hope in this respect. Discussion will focus on the relevance and potential of the Charter and assess the extent to which discrimination case law, which has effectively invoked the Charter, may be useful in protecting social rights in the wake of the CoJ’s decision in Viking and Laval.
LanguageEnglish
Pages173-192
Number of pages20
JournalContemporary Issues in Law
Volume12
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2013

Fingerprint

labor law
court of justice
social rights
European Law
charter
labor court
Lisbon Treaty
employment policy
Law
fundamental right
harmonization
trade union
case law
discrimination
EU
regulation
economics

Keywords

  • labour law
  • European law
  • employees rights
  • fundamental rights
  • freedom of establishment

Cite this

@article{6603b86ffe6c4861a4bd27fa536632e7,
title = "European labour law in crisis: the demise of social rights",
abstract = "Syrpis and Novitz have argued that ‘the choices which the Court has made in the Viking and Laval cases represent a tipping of the delicate balance between economic and social rights in favour of the former.’ ([2008] ELR 411). The Court of Justice’s (CoJ) judgments which led to a prolonged sense of crisis in European Labour Law came at a time when increasing emphasis was already being put on soft law mechanisms at EU level to achieve harmonisation across national employment policies in place of hard law regulation. In applying the CoJ’s decision in Laval, the Swedish labour court contributed to this sense of crisis by going beyond what was necessary to comply with the decision much to the detriment of national trade unions. Overall, there is little enthusiasm at national or European levels to develop further the provision and application of social rights within the employment context. This paper considers whether the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty in 2009 which gives legal effect to the Charter of Fundamental Rights provides new hope in this respect. Discussion will focus on the relevance and potential of the Charter and assess the extent to which discrimination case law, which has effectively invoked the Charter, may be useful in protecting social rights in the wake of the CoJ’s decision in Viking and Laval.",
keywords = "labour law, European law, employees rights, fundamental rights, freedom of establishment",
author = "Nicole Busby and Rebecca Zahn",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "173--192",
journal = "Contemporary Issues in Law",
issn = "1357-0374",
number = "2",

}

European labour law in crisis : the demise of social rights. / Busby, Nicole; Zahn, Rebecca.

In: Contemporary Issues in Law, Vol. 12, No. 2, 01.02.2013, p. 173-192.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - European labour law in crisis

T2 - Contemporary Issues in Law

AU - Busby, Nicole

AU - Zahn, Rebecca

PY - 2013/2/1

Y1 - 2013/2/1

N2 - Syrpis and Novitz have argued that ‘the choices which the Court has made in the Viking and Laval cases represent a tipping of the delicate balance between economic and social rights in favour of the former.’ ([2008] ELR 411). The Court of Justice’s (CoJ) judgments which led to a prolonged sense of crisis in European Labour Law came at a time when increasing emphasis was already being put on soft law mechanisms at EU level to achieve harmonisation across national employment policies in place of hard law regulation. In applying the CoJ’s decision in Laval, the Swedish labour court contributed to this sense of crisis by going beyond what was necessary to comply with the decision much to the detriment of national trade unions. Overall, there is little enthusiasm at national or European levels to develop further the provision and application of social rights within the employment context. This paper considers whether the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty in 2009 which gives legal effect to the Charter of Fundamental Rights provides new hope in this respect. Discussion will focus on the relevance and potential of the Charter and assess the extent to which discrimination case law, which has effectively invoked the Charter, may be useful in protecting social rights in the wake of the CoJ’s decision in Viking and Laval.

AB - Syrpis and Novitz have argued that ‘the choices which the Court has made in the Viking and Laval cases represent a tipping of the delicate balance between economic and social rights in favour of the former.’ ([2008] ELR 411). The Court of Justice’s (CoJ) judgments which led to a prolonged sense of crisis in European Labour Law came at a time when increasing emphasis was already being put on soft law mechanisms at EU level to achieve harmonisation across national employment policies in place of hard law regulation. In applying the CoJ’s decision in Laval, the Swedish labour court contributed to this sense of crisis by going beyond what was necessary to comply with the decision much to the detriment of national trade unions. Overall, there is little enthusiasm at national or European levels to develop further the provision and application of social rights within the employment context. This paper considers whether the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty in 2009 which gives legal effect to the Charter of Fundamental Rights provides new hope in this respect. Discussion will focus on the relevance and potential of the Charter and assess the extent to which discrimination case law, which has effectively invoked the Charter, may be useful in protecting social rights in the wake of the CoJ’s decision in Viking and Laval.

KW - labour law

KW - European law

KW - employees rights

KW - fundamental rights

KW - freedom of establishment

UR - http://www.lawtext.com/lawtextweb/default.jsp?PageID=2

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 173

EP - 192

JO - Contemporary Issues in Law

JF - Contemporary Issues in Law

SN - 1357-0374

IS - 2

ER -