EU cohesion policy and the role of the regions

investigating the influence of structural funds in the new member states

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Citations (Scopus)
70 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper undertakes a critical assessment of the influence of the EU Cohesion policy on regionalisation and the role of regional institutions in Central and Eastern Europe. It addresses questions that are central to ongoing theoretical debates about the role of the region in the new member states. Have the powers and resources of the regions been strengthened by their involvement in EU support programmes? Are regions increasingly involved in integrated 'bottom-up' responses to regional development challenges? The paper offers a fresh perspective on these issues, with a cross-national analysis of practical experience in the postenlargement period and a detailed assessment of the technical, variable, and complex reality of working with EU Structural Funds. A distinctive approach of the analysis is to disaggregate the stages of Structural Funds programme management and delivery, thereby highlighting the varied nature of regional involvement in Structural Funds. Ultimately, the paper questions the notion that Structural Funds build regional structures and competence, and lead to 'stronger regions'. Instead, it is argued that there is no guarantee that the Structural Funds will necessarily promote regionalisation in Central and Eastern Europe, at least in the short to medium terms.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)398-427
Number of pages29
JournalEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

group cohesion
cohesion
EU
regionalization
Central Europe
Eastern Europe
regional structure
regional development
guarantee
policy
resource
management
resources
experience
programme
analysis

Keywords

  • cohesion policy
  • European Union
  • structural funds
  • regional development
  • member states

Cite this

@article{92d6e2f0982948c3b570659606b1e1ca,
title = "EU cohesion policy and the role of the regions: investigating the influence of structural funds in the new member states",
abstract = "This paper undertakes a critical assessment of the influence of the EU Cohesion policy on regionalisation and the role of regional institutions in Central and Eastern Europe. It addresses questions that are central to ongoing theoretical debates about the role of the region in the new member states. Have the powers and resources of the regions been strengthened by their involvement in EU support programmes? Are regions increasingly involved in integrated 'bottom-up' responses to regional development challenges? The paper offers a fresh perspective on these issues, with a cross-national analysis of practical experience in the postenlargement period and a detailed assessment of the technical, variable, and complex reality of working with EU Structural Funds. A distinctive approach of the analysis is to disaggregate the stages of Structural Funds programme management and delivery, thereby highlighting the varied nature of regional involvement in Structural Funds. Ultimately, the paper questions the notion that Structural Funds build regional structures and competence, and lead to 'stronger regions'. Instead, it is argued that there is no guarantee that the Structural Funds will necessarily promote regionalisation in Central and Eastern Europe, at least in the short to medium terms.",
keywords = "cohesion policy, European Union, structural funds, regional development, member states",
author = "John Bachtler and Irene McMaster",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1068/c0662",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "398--427",
journal = "Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy",
issn = "1472-3425",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - EU cohesion policy and the role of the regions

T2 - investigating the influence of structural funds in the new member states

AU - Bachtler, John

AU - McMaster, Irene

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This paper undertakes a critical assessment of the influence of the EU Cohesion policy on regionalisation and the role of regional institutions in Central and Eastern Europe. It addresses questions that are central to ongoing theoretical debates about the role of the region in the new member states. Have the powers and resources of the regions been strengthened by their involvement in EU support programmes? Are regions increasingly involved in integrated 'bottom-up' responses to regional development challenges? The paper offers a fresh perspective on these issues, with a cross-national analysis of practical experience in the postenlargement period and a detailed assessment of the technical, variable, and complex reality of working with EU Structural Funds. A distinctive approach of the analysis is to disaggregate the stages of Structural Funds programme management and delivery, thereby highlighting the varied nature of regional involvement in Structural Funds. Ultimately, the paper questions the notion that Structural Funds build regional structures and competence, and lead to 'stronger regions'. Instead, it is argued that there is no guarantee that the Structural Funds will necessarily promote regionalisation in Central and Eastern Europe, at least in the short to medium terms.

AB - This paper undertakes a critical assessment of the influence of the EU Cohesion policy on regionalisation and the role of regional institutions in Central and Eastern Europe. It addresses questions that are central to ongoing theoretical debates about the role of the region in the new member states. Have the powers and resources of the regions been strengthened by their involvement in EU support programmes? Are regions increasingly involved in integrated 'bottom-up' responses to regional development challenges? The paper offers a fresh perspective on these issues, with a cross-national analysis of practical experience in the postenlargement period and a detailed assessment of the technical, variable, and complex reality of working with EU Structural Funds. A distinctive approach of the analysis is to disaggregate the stages of Structural Funds programme management and delivery, thereby highlighting the varied nature of regional involvement in Structural Funds. Ultimately, the paper questions the notion that Structural Funds build regional structures and competence, and lead to 'stronger regions'. Instead, it is argued that there is no guarantee that the Structural Funds will necessarily promote regionalisation in Central and Eastern Europe, at least in the short to medium terms.

KW - cohesion policy

KW - European Union

KW - structural funds

KW - regional development

KW - member states

U2 - 10.1068/c0662

DO - 10.1068/c0662

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 398

EP - 427

JO - Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy

JF - Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy

SN - 1472-3425

IS - 2

ER -