Ethics, education policy and research: the phonics question reconsidered

Sue Ellis, Gemma Moss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper argues that direct control of the early years literacy curriculum recently exercised by politicians in England has made the boundaries between research, policy and practice increasingly fragile. It describes how policy came to focus most effort on the use of synthetic phonics programmes in the early years. It examines why the Clackmannanshire phonics intervention became the study most frequently cited to justify government policy and suggests a phonics research agenda that could more usefully inform teaching. It argues that, whilst academics cannot control how their research is eventually used by policymakers, learned societies can strengthen their ethics policies to set out clearer ground-rules for academic researchers working across knowledge domains and with policymakers. A stronger framework to guide the ethical interpretation of research evidence in complex education investigations would allow more meaningful conversations to take place within and across research communities, and with research users. The paper suggests some features for such a framework.
LanguageEnglish
Pages241–260
Number of pages20
JournalBritish Educational Research Journal
Volume40
Issue number2
Early online date25 Feb 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2014

Fingerprint

moral philosophy
education
user research
research policy
research practice
government policy
politician
conversation
literacy
curriculum
interpretation
Teaching
society
knowledge
community
evidence

Keywords

  • phonics
  • research ethics
  • literacy policy
  • early reading
  • knowledge mobilization
  • evidence-based education

Cite this

@article{112a60b9f15141f1ab44260c6e8f2e7e,
title = "Ethics, education policy and research: the phonics question reconsidered",
abstract = "This paper argues that direct control of the early years literacy curriculum recently exercised by politicians in England has made the boundaries between research, policy and practice increasingly fragile. It describes how policy came to focus most effort on the use of synthetic phonics programmes in the early years. It examines why the Clackmannanshire phonics intervention became the study most frequently cited to justify government policy and suggests a phonics research agenda that could more usefully inform teaching. It argues that, whilst academics cannot control how their research is eventually used by policymakers, learned societies can strengthen their ethics policies to set out clearer ground-rules for academic researchers working across knowledge domains and with policymakers. A stronger framework to guide the ethical interpretation of research evidence in complex education investigations would allow more meaningful conversations to take place within and across research communities, and with research users. The paper suggests some features for such a framework.",
keywords = "phonics , research ethics, literacy policy, early reading, knowledge mobilization, evidence-based education",
author = "Sue Ellis and Gemma Moss",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1002/berj.3039",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "241–260",
journal = "British Educational Research Journal",
issn = "0141-1926",
number = "2",

}

Ethics, education policy and research : the phonics question reconsidered. / Ellis, Sue; Moss, Gemma.

In: British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 40, No. 2, 04.2014, p. 241–260.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethics, education policy and research

T2 - British Educational Research Journal

AU - Ellis, Sue

AU - Moss, Gemma

PY - 2014/4

Y1 - 2014/4

N2 - This paper argues that direct control of the early years literacy curriculum recently exercised by politicians in England has made the boundaries between research, policy and practice increasingly fragile. It describes how policy came to focus most effort on the use of synthetic phonics programmes in the early years. It examines why the Clackmannanshire phonics intervention became the study most frequently cited to justify government policy and suggests a phonics research agenda that could more usefully inform teaching. It argues that, whilst academics cannot control how their research is eventually used by policymakers, learned societies can strengthen their ethics policies to set out clearer ground-rules for academic researchers working across knowledge domains and with policymakers. A stronger framework to guide the ethical interpretation of research evidence in complex education investigations would allow more meaningful conversations to take place within and across research communities, and with research users. The paper suggests some features for such a framework.

AB - This paper argues that direct control of the early years literacy curriculum recently exercised by politicians in England has made the boundaries between research, policy and practice increasingly fragile. It describes how policy came to focus most effort on the use of synthetic phonics programmes in the early years. It examines why the Clackmannanshire phonics intervention became the study most frequently cited to justify government policy and suggests a phonics research agenda that could more usefully inform teaching. It argues that, whilst academics cannot control how their research is eventually used by policymakers, learned societies can strengthen their ethics policies to set out clearer ground-rules for academic researchers working across knowledge domains and with policymakers. A stronger framework to guide the ethical interpretation of research evidence in complex education investigations would allow more meaningful conversations to take place within and across research communities, and with research users. The paper suggests some features for such a framework.

KW - phonics

KW - research ethics

KW - literacy policy

KW - early reading

KW - knowledge mobilization

KW - evidence-based education

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/%28ISSN%291469-3518

U2 - 10.1002/berj.3039

DO - 10.1002/berj.3039

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 241

EP - 260

JO - British Educational Research Journal

JF - British Educational Research Journal

SN - 0141-1926

IS - 2

ER -