ePrints and PURE: Discussion Paper

    Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

    Abstract

    The purpose of this paper is to re-examine the merits of the present repository configuration at the University of Strathclyde, specifically the parallel operation of both ePrints and PURE. The paper will also explore the implications of alternative repository scenarios. Several comparative analyses of ePrints and PURE have been undertaken by the IRSG over recent years. These analyses have tended to focus on the functionality of both systems with the aim of rationalising and determining which should become the University's principal research repository. It is not the intention of this paper to repeat these analyses because whilst they were deemed necessary at the time they were inadequate insofar as they focused on functionality at the expense of wider considerations. Previous analyses also failed to accept that Institutional Repositories (IRs) and Current Research Information Systems (CRISs), although demonstrating overlapping functionality and content, have evolved to fulfill different purposes. For these reasons this document can be considered a discussion paper to inform the decision making of the IRSG rather than a direct comparison of the technical features available in ePrints and PURE. This should enable informed decision making concerning the future of repositories at the institution. The paper is structured as follows: The first section explains the current institutional repository configuration and describes the issues surrounding any direct comparison of IR and CRIS implementations. Section 2 provides the majority of the discursive content, using an IR typology as the basis for discussion. Finally, section 3 sets out a series of feasible IR scenarios to be considered by the IRSG, with areas of risk, opportunity, etc. highlighted.
    LanguageEnglish
    Place of PublicationGlasgow
    PublisherUniversity of Strathclyde
    Pages1-37
    Number of pages37
    Publication statusPublished - 14 Dec 2013

    Fingerprint

    functionality
    information system
    Information systems
    Decision making
    scenario
    decision making
    typology
    present
    time

    Keywords

    • repositories
    • current research information systems
    • CRIS
    • EPrints
    • information retrieval

    Cite this

    Macgregor, G. (2013). ePrints and PURE: Discussion Paper. (pp. 1-37). Glasgow: University of Strathclyde.
    Macgregor, George. / ePrints and PURE : Discussion Paper. Glasgow : University of Strathclyde, 2013. pp. 1-37
    @techreport{1428a8fb042e429aa7e22cdb6fe40f3d,
    title = "ePrints and PURE: Discussion Paper",
    abstract = "The purpose of this paper is to re-examine the merits of the present repository configuration at the University of Strathclyde, specifically the parallel operation of both ePrints and PURE. The paper will also explore the implications of alternative repository scenarios. Several comparative analyses of ePrints and PURE have been undertaken by the IRSG over recent years. These analyses have tended to focus on the functionality of both systems with the aim of rationalising and determining which should become the University's principal research repository. It is not the intention of this paper to repeat these analyses because whilst they were deemed necessary at the time they were inadequate insofar as they focused on functionality at the expense of wider considerations. Previous analyses also failed to accept that Institutional Repositories (IRs) and Current Research Information Systems (CRISs), although demonstrating overlapping functionality and content, have evolved to fulfill different purposes. For these reasons this document can be considered a discussion paper to inform the decision making of the IRSG rather than a direct comparison of the technical features available in ePrints and PURE. This should enable informed decision making concerning the future of repositories at the institution. The paper is structured as follows: The first section explains the current institutional repository configuration and describes the issues surrounding any direct comparison of IR and CRIS implementations. Section 2 provides the majority of the discursive content, using an IR typology as the basis for discussion. Finally, section 3 sets out a series of feasible IR scenarios to be considered by the IRSG, with areas of risk, opportunity, etc. highlighted.",
    keywords = "repositories, current research information systems, CRIS, EPrints, information retrieval",
    author = "George Macgregor",
    note = "A discussion paper presented to the University of Strathclyde Institutional Repository Steering Group.",
    year = "2013",
    month = "12",
    day = "14",
    language = "English",
    pages = "1--37",
    publisher = "University of Strathclyde",
    type = "WorkingPaper",
    institution = "University of Strathclyde",

    }

    Macgregor, G 2013 'ePrints and PURE: Discussion Paper' University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, pp. 1-37.

    ePrints and PURE : Discussion Paper. / Macgregor, George.

    Glasgow : University of Strathclyde, 2013. p. 1-37.

    Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

    TY - UNPB

    T1 - ePrints and PURE

    T2 - Discussion Paper

    AU - Macgregor, George

    N1 - A discussion paper presented to the University of Strathclyde Institutional Repository Steering Group.

    PY - 2013/12/14

    Y1 - 2013/12/14

    N2 - The purpose of this paper is to re-examine the merits of the present repository configuration at the University of Strathclyde, specifically the parallel operation of both ePrints and PURE. The paper will also explore the implications of alternative repository scenarios. Several comparative analyses of ePrints and PURE have been undertaken by the IRSG over recent years. These analyses have tended to focus on the functionality of both systems with the aim of rationalising and determining which should become the University's principal research repository. It is not the intention of this paper to repeat these analyses because whilst they were deemed necessary at the time they were inadequate insofar as they focused on functionality at the expense of wider considerations. Previous analyses also failed to accept that Institutional Repositories (IRs) and Current Research Information Systems (CRISs), although demonstrating overlapping functionality and content, have evolved to fulfill different purposes. For these reasons this document can be considered a discussion paper to inform the decision making of the IRSG rather than a direct comparison of the technical features available in ePrints and PURE. This should enable informed decision making concerning the future of repositories at the institution. The paper is structured as follows: The first section explains the current institutional repository configuration and describes the issues surrounding any direct comparison of IR and CRIS implementations. Section 2 provides the majority of the discursive content, using an IR typology as the basis for discussion. Finally, section 3 sets out a series of feasible IR scenarios to be considered by the IRSG, with areas of risk, opportunity, etc. highlighted.

    AB - The purpose of this paper is to re-examine the merits of the present repository configuration at the University of Strathclyde, specifically the parallel operation of both ePrints and PURE. The paper will also explore the implications of alternative repository scenarios. Several comparative analyses of ePrints and PURE have been undertaken by the IRSG over recent years. These analyses have tended to focus on the functionality of both systems with the aim of rationalising and determining which should become the University's principal research repository. It is not the intention of this paper to repeat these analyses because whilst they were deemed necessary at the time they were inadequate insofar as they focused on functionality at the expense of wider considerations. Previous analyses also failed to accept that Institutional Repositories (IRs) and Current Research Information Systems (CRISs), although demonstrating overlapping functionality and content, have evolved to fulfill different purposes. For these reasons this document can be considered a discussion paper to inform the decision making of the IRSG rather than a direct comparison of the technical features available in ePrints and PURE. This should enable informed decision making concerning the future of repositories at the institution. The paper is structured as follows: The first section explains the current institutional repository configuration and describes the issues surrounding any direct comparison of IR and CRIS implementations. Section 2 provides the majority of the discursive content, using an IR typology as the basis for discussion. Finally, section 3 sets out a series of feasible IR scenarios to be considered by the IRSG, with areas of risk, opportunity, etc. highlighted.

    KW - repositories

    KW - current research information systems

    KW - CRIS

    KW - EPrints

    KW - information retrieval

    M3 - Discussion paper

    SP - 1

    EP - 37

    BT - ePrints and PURE

    PB - University of Strathclyde

    CY - Glasgow

    ER -

    Macgregor G. ePrints and PURE: Discussion Paper. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde. 2013 Dec 14, p. 1-37.