Epilogue - Imperial complexities: in pursuit of 'provocative' post-imperial analyses

J. A. Mangan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The Western ‘imperial’ world view has been described as a ‘core ideology’ with confident attendant belief systems based on associated uncomplicated self-belief in the mandate for control. Western imperialists used their sports for hegemonic domination, an early manifestation of globalisation still barley investigated. However, the claim for these imperialists as exclusive disseminators should not be pressed too vigorously. The time is ripe for caveats, caution and complexities. There was never a monolithic cultural response to the use of sport in imperial control. Thus it is time for a provocative agenda for analytical modernists and for a further and fuller study of the evolution of modern sport set hard in a political context.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages2625-2632
    Number of pages8
    JournalInternational Journal of the History of Sport
    Volume28
    Issue number17
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 2011

    Fingerprint

    Sports
    domination
    ideology
    globalization
    Pursuit
    Epilogue
    time
    Imperialist
    Self-beliefs
    Belief Systems
    Modernist
    World View
    Barley
    Manifestation
    Globalization
    Ideology
    Domination
    Agenda

    Keywords

    • cultural imperialism
    • curriculum control
    • cultural legacies

    Cite this

    @article{a2909236d6f142adb6d7efccfae36b75,
    title = "Epilogue - Imperial complexities: in pursuit of 'provocative' post-imperial analyses",
    abstract = "The Western ‘imperial’ world view has been described as a ‘core ideology’ with confident attendant belief systems based on associated uncomplicated self-belief in the mandate for control. Western imperialists used their sports for hegemonic domination, an early manifestation of globalisation still barley investigated. However, the claim for these imperialists as exclusive disseminators should not be pressed too vigorously. The time is ripe for caveats, caution and complexities. There was never a monolithic cultural response to the use of sport in imperial control. Thus it is time for a provocative agenda for analytical modernists and for a further and fuller study of the evolution of modern sport set hard in a political context.",
    keywords = "cultural imperialism, curriculum control, cultural legacies",
    author = "Mangan, {J. A.}",
    year = "2011",
    month = "12",
    day = "15",
    doi = "10.1080/09523367.2011.627203",
    language = "English",
    volume = "28",
    pages = "2625--2632",
    journal = "International Journal of the History of Sport",
    issn = "0952-3367",
    number = "17",

    }

    Epilogue - Imperial complexities : in pursuit of 'provocative' post-imperial analyses. / Mangan, J. A.

    In: International Journal of the History of Sport , Vol. 28, No. 17, 15.12.2011, p. 2625-2632.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Epilogue - Imperial complexities

    T2 - International Journal of the History of Sport

    AU - Mangan, J. A.

    PY - 2011/12/15

    Y1 - 2011/12/15

    N2 - The Western ‘imperial’ world view has been described as a ‘core ideology’ with confident attendant belief systems based on associated uncomplicated self-belief in the mandate for control. Western imperialists used their sports for hegemonic domination, an early manifestation of globalisation still barley investigated. However, the claim for these imperialists as exclusive disseminators should not be pressed too vigorously. The time is ripe for caveats, caution and complexities. There was never a monolithic cultural response to the use of sport in imperial control. Thus it is time for a provocative agenda for analytical modernists and for a further and fuller study of the evolution of modern sport set hard in a political context.

    AB - The Western ‘imperial’ world view has been described as a ‘core ideology’ with confident attendant belief systems based on associated uncomplicated self-belief in the mandate for control. Western imperialists used their sports for hegemonic domination, an early manifestation of globalisation still barley investigated. However, the claim for these imperialists as exclusive disseminators should not be pressed too vigorously. The time is ripe for caveats, caution and complexities. There was never a monolithic cultural response to the use of sport in imperial control. Thus it is time for a provocative agenda for analytical modernists and for a further and fuller study of the evolution of modern sport set hard in a political context.

    KW - cultural imperialism

    KW - curriculum control

    KW - cultural legacies

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857307102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/09523367.2011.627203

    DO - 10.1080/09523367.2011.627203

    M3 - Article

    VL - 28

    SP - 2625

    EP - 2632

    JO - International Journal of the History of Sport

    JF - International Journal of the History of Sport

    SN - 0952-3367

    IS - 17

    ER -