Environmental regulation, sustainability and risk

J. Campbell Gemmell, E. Marian Scott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose
This paper aims to provide an overview of environmental regulation and recent trends and developments in this area, rooted in the practical regulatory implementation activities of EPAs worldwide and drawing connection to sustainability, environmental risks, economics and environmental justice.

Design/methodology/approach
The design and methodology in developing “Better (Environmental) Regulation” is addressed drawn on experiences from different regulatory systems. It addresses the linkages between environment, economy, regulation and sustainability and adopts and develops Sparrow's approach to a focus on tackling harms.

Findings
A range of challenges in policy and practice terms – e.g. economic growth versus sustainability – is described. Arguments against the political economy convention of reducing burdens are made and a spectrum of compliance for regulators is offered, leading to a proposed agenda to help deliver better regulation generally.

Research limitations/implications
A major challenge in arguing for an anti‐burden approach is the lack of a general ecosystem services approach and the dearth of valuation data to validate industry claims, demonstrate the costs of compliance and non‐environment and the value of protection.

Practical implications
The argument is presented that environmental regulation is of fundamental value not only to the environment per se but to tackling climate change and protecting society at large.

Originality/value
Hitherto there has been very little in the literature from a practitioner perspective, analysing and proposing improvements to environmental regulation in practice while preserving and securing environmental and sustainability policy objectives. This paper should support and encourage policy makers and implementers in improving practice.
LanguageEnglish
Pages120-144
Number of pages25
JournalSustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Aug 2013

Fingerprint

Environmental regulations
Sustainable development
Economics
Climate change
Ecosystems
Environmental regulation
Sustainability
Costs
Industry
Compliance
Burden

Keywords

  • environmental regulations
  • better regulation
  • tackling harms
  • sustainability
  • regulation

Cite this

@article{b73bf555d4c34c10840b96fd4f2087a8,
title = "Environmental regulation, sustainability and risk",
abstract = "PurposeThis paper aims to provide an overview of environmental regulation and recent trends and developments in this area, rooted in the practical regulatory implementation activities of EPAs worldwide and drawing connection to sustainability, environmental risks, economics and environmental justice.Design/methodology/approachThe design and methodology in developing “Better (Environmental) Regulation” is addressed drawn on experiences from different regulatory systems. It addresses the linkages between environment, economy, regulation and sustainability and adopts and develops Sparrow's approach to a focus on tackling harms.FindingsA range of challenges in policy and practice terms – e.g. economic growth versus sustainability – is described. Arguments against the political economy convention of reducing burdens are made and a spectrum of compliance for regulators is offered, leading to a proposed agenda to help deliver better regulation generally.Research limitations/implicationsA major challenge in arguing for an anti‐burden approach is the lack of a general ecosystem services approach and the dearth of valuation data to validate industry claims, demonstrate the costs of compliance and non‐environment and the value of protection.Practical implicationsThe argument is presented that environmental regulation is of fundamental value not only to the environment per se but to tackling climate change and protecting society at large.Originality/valueHitherto there has been very little in the literature from a practitioner perspective, analysing and proposing improvements to environmental regulation in practice while preserving and securing environmental and sustainability policy objectives. This paper should support and encourage policy makers and implementers in improving practice.",
keywords = "environmental regulations, better regulation, tackling harms, sustainability, regulation",
author = "Gemmell, {J. Campbell} and Scott, {E. Marian}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1108/SAMPJ-Jan-2012-0003",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "120--144",
journal = "Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal",
issn = "2040-8021",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "2",

}

Environmental regulation, sustainability and risk. / Gemmell, J. Campbell; Scott, E. Marian.

In: Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Vol. 4, No. 2, 02.08.2013, p. 120-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Environmental regulation, sustainability and risk

AU - Gemmell, J. Campbell

AU - Scott, E. Marian

PY - 2013/8/2

Y1 - 2013/8/2

N2 - PurposeThis paper aims to provide an overview of environmental regulation and recent trends and developments in this area, rooted in the practical regulatory implementation activities of EPAs worldwide and drawing connection to sustainability, environmental risks, economics and environmental justice.Design/methodology/approachThe design and methodology in developing “Better (Environmental) Regulation” is addressed drawn on experiences from different regulatory systems. It addresses the linkages between environment, economy, regulation and sustainability and adopts and develops Sparrow's approach to a focus on tackling harms.FindingsA range of challenges in policy and practice terms – e.g. economic growth versus sustainability – is described. Arguments against the political economy convention of reducing burdens are made and a spectrum of compliance for regulators is offered, leading to a proposed agenda to help deliver better regulation generally.Research limitations/implicationsA major challenge in arguing for an anti‐burden approach is the lack of a general ecosystem services approach and the dearth of valuation data to validate industry claims, demonstrate the costs of compliance and non‐environment and the value of protection.Practical implicationsThe argument is presented that environmental regulation is of fundamental value not only to the environment per se but to tackling climate change and protecting society at large.Originality/valueHitherto there has been very little in the literature from a practitioner perspective, analysing and proposing improvements to environmental regulation in practice while preserving and securing environmental and sustainability policy objectives. This paper should support and encourage policy makers and implementers in improving practice.

AB - PurposeThis paper aims to provide an overview of environmental regulation and recent trends and developments in this area, rooted in the practical regulatory implementation activities of EPAs worldwide and drawing connection to sustainability, environmental risks, economics and environmental justice.Design/methodology/approachThe design and methodology in developing “Better (Environmental) Regulation” is addressed drawn on experiences from different regulatory systems. It addresses the linkages between environment, economy, regulation and sustainability and adopts and develops Sparrow's approach to a focus on tackling harms.FindingsA range of challenges in policy and practice terms – e.g. economic growth versus sustainability – is described. Arguments against the political economy convention of reducing burdens are made and a spectrum of compliance for regulators is offered, leading to a proposed agenda to help deliver better regulation generally.Research limitations/implicationsA major challenge in arguing for an anti‐burden approach is the lack of a general ecosystem services approach and the dearth of valuation data to validate industry claims, demonstrate the costs of compliance and non‐environment and the value of protection.Practical implicationsThe argument is presented that environmental regulation is of fundamental value not only to the environment per se but to tackling climate change and protecting society at large.Originality/valueHitherto there has been very little in the literature from a practitioner perspective, analysing and proposing improvements to environmental regulation in practice while preserving and securing environmental and sustainability policy objectives. This paper should support and encourage policy makers and implementers in improving practice.

KW - environmental regulations

KW - better regulation

KW - tackling harms

KW - sustainability

KW - regulation

U2 - 10.1108/SAMPJ-Jan-2012-0003

DO - 10.1108/SAMPJ-Jan-2012-0003

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 120

EP - 144

JO - Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal

T2 - Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal

JF - Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal

SN - 2040-8021

IS - 2

ER -