Enhancing fundamental motor skills through active play: a systematic review and meta-analysis of educational contexts

Javier Ramos-Munell, Daniel Gallardo-Gómez, Francisco Álvarez-Barbosa, Rosa M. Alfonso-Rosa, John J. Reilly, Anthony Okely, Borja del Pozo-Cruz, Jesús del Pozo-Cruz*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of active play interventions to enhance Fundamental Motor Skills (FMS) in children aged 2–5 and compares different intervention modalities. It also explores the moderating role of world region and the use of recess in educational contexts. A systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis were conducted, using data from MEDLINE, Web of Science (WOS), Scopus, PsycINFO, Cinahl, and SPORTdiscus up to January 2023. Clinical trials with active play interventions in educational settings were included, excluding multicomponent interventions. Eighteen studies (2816 participants; 240 effect sizes) met the criteria. The overall average treatment effect (ATE) of active play versus control was 0.07 (95% CrI −0.004–0.15). Motor skills interventions showed a significant effect (SMD = 0.16, 95% CrI 0.01–0.29), especially when integrated into recess (SMD = 0.31, 95% CrI 0.03–0.62). The effectiveness varied across regions, highlighting the need for regional consideration in implementation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
JournalEuropean Early Childhood Education Research Journal
Early online date5 Apr 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 5 Apr 2025

Funding

This work was supported by Government of Andalusia, Research, Development, and Innovation Programme [grant number PAIDI P20_1181].

Keywords

  • child
  • preschool
  • motor skills
  • active play
  • recess time
  • physical activity
  • meta-analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Enhancing fundamental motor skills through active play: a systematic review and meta-analysis of educational contexts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this