Energy cooperation in the wider Europe: institutionalizing interdependence?

S.A. Padgett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The EU's response to concerns about energy security is to diversify sources of supply and delivery routes. To this end it seeks to engage potential energy partners across the wider Europe in an institutionalized regime based on the norms of the internal market. This article uses regime theory to evaluate the viability of the strategy. From this perspective, the willingness of the EU's partners to make commitments to institutionalized co-operation will depend on two sets of variables: their interests in resolving the co-operation problems that arise across the energy supply chain; and the ‘pull’ of the EU in relation to countervailing hegemonic powers in the region. The research tests this argument by examining the co-operation interests of energy consumers, transit countries and producers, and the architecture of emerging institutions in the respective regional contexts. It finds that while energy consumers and transit countries in the EU's immediate neighbourhood are prepared to commit to binding multilateral institutions, co-operation with energy producers is constrained by asymmetries of interest and regional geopolitics, and is likely to take the form of more flexible bilateral agreements.


LanguageEnglish
Pages1065-1087
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Common Market Studies
Volume49
Issue number5
Early online date21 Jan 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2011

Fingerprint

interdependence
energy
EU
producer
regime
energy supply
geopolitics
asymmetry
Energy
Interdependence
commitment
supply
market

Keywords

  • energy governance
  • europe
  • institutionalizing interdependence

Cite this

@article{ed3696b6dddf487fa73cb0111fda0924,
title = "Energy cooperation in the wider Europe: institutionalizing interdependence?",
abstract = "The EU's response to concerns about energy security is to diversify sources of supply and delivery routes. To this end it seeks to engage potential energy partners across the wider Europe in an institutionalized regime based on the norms of the internal market. This article uses regime theory to evaluate the viability of the strategy. From this perspective, the willingness of the EU's partners to make commitments to institutionalized co-operation will depend on two sets of variables: their interests in resolving the co-operation problems that arise across the energy supply chain; and the ‘pull’ of the EU in relation to countervailing hegemonic powers in the region. The research tests this argument by examining the co-operation interests of energy consumers, transit countries and producers, and the architecture of emerging institutions in the respective regional contexts. It finds that while energy consumers and transit countries in the EU's immediate neighbourhood are prepared to commit to binding multilateral institutions, co-operation with energy producers is constrained by asymmetries of interest and regional geopolitics, and is likely to take the form of more flexible bilateral agreements.",
keywords = "energy governance, europe, institutionalizing interdependence",
author = "S.A. Padgett",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02168.x",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "1065--1087",
journal = "Journal of Common Market Studies",
issn = "0021-9886",
number = "5",

}

Energy cooperation in the wider Europe: institutionalizing interdependence? / Padgett, S.A.

In: Journal of Common Market Studies , Vol. 49, No. 5, 09.2011, p. 1065-1087.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Energy cooperation in the wider Europe: institutionalizing interdependence?

AU - Padgett, S.A.

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - The EU's response to concerns about energy security is to diversify sources of supply and delivery routes. To this end it seeks to engage potential energy partners across the wider Europe in an institutionalized regime based on the norms of the internal market. This article uses regime theory to evaluate the viability of the strategy. From this perspective, the willingness of the EU's partners to make commitments to institutionalized co-operation will depend on two sets of variables: their interests in resolving the co-operation problems that arise across the energy supply chain; and the ‘pull’ of the EU in relation to countervailing hegemonic powers in the region. The research tests this argument by examining the co-operation interests of energy consumers, transit countries and producers, and the architecture of emerging institutions in the respective regional contexts. It finds that while energy consumers and transit countries in the EU's immediate neighbourhood are prepared to commit to binding multilateral institutions, co-operation with energy producers is constrained by asymmetries of interest and regional geopolitics, and is likely to take the form of more flexible bilateral agreements.

AB - The EU's response to concerns about energy security is to diversify sources of supply and delivery routes. To this end it seeks to engage potential energy partners across the wider Europe in an institutionalized regime based on the norms of the internal market. This article uses regime theory to evaluate the viability of the strategy. From this perspective, the willingness of the EU's partners to make commitments to institutionalized co-operation will depend on two sets of variables: their interests in resolving the co-operation problems that arise across the energy supply chain; and the ‘pull’ of the EU in relation to countervailing hegemonic powers in the region. The research tests this argument by examining the co-operation interests of energy consumers, transit countries and producers, and the architecture of emerging institutions in the respective regional contexts. It finds that while energy consumers and transit countries in the EU's immediate neighbourhood are prepared to commit to binding multilateral institutions, co-operation with energy producers is constrained by asymmetries of interest and regional geopolitics, and is likely to take the form of more flexible bilateral agreements.

KW - energy governance

KW - europe

KW - institutionalizing interdependence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960771853&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02168.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02168.x

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 1065

EP - 1087

JO - Journal of Common Market Studies

T2 - Journal of Common Market Studies

JF - Journal of Common Market Studies

SN - 0021-9886

IS - 5

ER -