TY - JOUR
T1 - End TB strategy
T2 - the need to reduce risk inequalities
AU - Gomes, M. Gabriela M.
AU - Barreto, Maurício L.
AU - Glaziou, Philippe
AU - Medley, Graham F.
AU - Rodrigues, Laura C.
AU - Wallinga, Jacco
AU - Squire, S. Bertel
PY - 2016/3/22
Y1 - 2016/3/22
N2 - Background: Diseases occur in populations whose individuals differ in essential characteristics, such as exposure to the causative agent, susceptibility given exposure, and infectiousness upon infection in the case of infectious diseases. Discussion: Concepts developed in demography more than 30years ago assert that variability between individuals affects substantially the estimation of overall population risk from disease incidence data. Methods that ignore individual heterogeneity tend to underestimate overall risk and lead to overoptimistic expectations for control. Concerned that this phenomenon is frequently overlooked in epidemiology, here we feature its significance for interpreting global data on human tuberculosis and predicting the impact of control measures. Summary: We show that population-wide interventions have the greatest impact in populations where all individuals face an equal risk. Lowering variability in risk has great potential to increase the impact of interventions. Reducing inequality, therefore, empowers health interventions, which in turn improves health, further reducing inequality, in a virtuous circle.
AB - Background: Diseases occur in populations whose individuals differ in essential characteristics, such as exposure to the causative agent, susceptibility given exposure, and infectiousness upon infection in the case of infectious diseases. Discussion: Concepts developed in demography more than 30years ago assert that variability between individuals affects substantially the estimation of overall population risk from disease incidence data. Methods that ignore individual heterogeneity tend to underestimate overall risk and lead to overoptimistic expectations for control. Concerned that this phenomenon is frequently overlooked in epidemiology, here we feature its significance for interpreting global data on human tuberculosis and predicting the impact of control measures. Summary: We show that population-wide interventions have the greatest impact in populations where all individuals face an equal risk. Lowering variability in risk has great potential to increase the impact of interventions. Reducing inequality, therefore, empowers health interventions, which in turn improves health, further reducing inequality, in a virtuous circle.
KW - cohort selection
KW - heterogeneity
KW - intervention impact
KW - social inequality
KW - tuberculosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962045591&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12879-016-1464-8
DO - 10.1186/s12879-016-1464-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 27001766
AN - SCOPUS:84962045591
SN - 1471-2334
VL - 16
SP - 1
EP - 4
JO - BMC Infectious Diseases
JF - BMC Infectious Diseases
IS - 1
M1 - 132
ER -