Encouraging and supporting children's voices

Sarah-Jane Conrad, Claire Cassidy, Christian Mathis

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Children are considered not to be full members of society and that their participation should be limited. Further, that this limitation is imposed by adults. In order to counter these views it is key to afford space for children’s voices and that these are facilitated in some way. Philosophy with Children, in all its variety of approaches and practices, lays claim to being a tool that allows children to develop the skills necessary for citizenship such as participation and airing their views. The chapter focuses on the role of Community of Philosophical Inquiry (CoPI), a specific method of practical philosophy with children, to empower children and give them a voice. CoPI has a series of distinctive features that make it especially apt in meeting this goal. Children are able articulate their views on a particular topic and this is supported by the structure of the dialogue itself. In addition, though, their statements must build on previous statements by demonstrating dis/agreement and the participants must provide reasons to justify that dis/agreement. The method also emphasises the primacy of the children’s thinking and the facilitator works to juxtapose speakers in order to drive the dialogue further philosophically. In this chapter, these features of CoPI are illustrated by examples from dialogues on the Good Life, stimulated by the question "What kind of society would you like to live in?" CoPI is shown to give children voice with a view to promoting their participation in society while also eschewing the imbalance in the adult/child power relationship. Here, we see what is important to children in the lives they want to live, for themselves and for those around them. What is of particular interest is the manner in which the children appear to collude with the adult/child power divide in how they talk about the kind of society in which they’d like to live.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationYouth Quotas and Other Efficient Forms of Youth Participation in Ageing Societies
EditorsJorg Tremmel, Antony Mason, Petter Haakenstad Godli, Igor Dimitrijoski
Place of PublicationCham
PublisherSpringer
Pages109-124
Number of pages16
ISBN (Print)9783319134307, 9783319383125
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Mar 2015

Fingerprint

dialogue
community
participation
practical philosophy
citizenship
Society
philosophy

Keywords

  • children's participation
  • philosophy with children
  • childhood
  • children's voice
  • good life
  • marginalization of young people

Cite this

Conrad, S-J., Cassidy, C., & Mathis, C. (2015). Encouraging and supporting children's voices. In J. Tremmel, A. Mason, P. Haakenstad Godli, & I. Dimitrijoski (Eds.), Youth Quotas and Other Efficient Forms of Youth Participation in Ageing Societies (pp. 109-124). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13431-4
Conrad, Sarah-Jane ; Cassidy, Claire ; Mathis, Christian. / Encouraging and supporting children's voices. Youth Quotas and Other Efficient Forms of Youth Participation in Ageing Societies. editor / Jorg Tremmel ; Antony Mason ; Petter Haakenstad Godli ; Igor Dimitrijoski. Cham : Springer, 2015. pp. 109-124
@inbook{a177e67ef88c4bf4927f4e81b8ff2083,
title = "Encouraging and supporting children's voices",
abstract = "Children are considered not to be full members of society and that their participation should be limited. Further, that this limitation is imposed by adults. In order to counter these views it is key to afford space for children’s voices and that these are facilitated in some way. Philosophy with Children, in all its variety of approaches and practices, lays claim to being a tool that allows children to develop the skills necessary for citizenship such as participation and airing their views. The chapter focuses on the role of Community of Philosophical Inquiry (CoPI), a specific method of practical philosophy with children, to empower children and give them a voice. CoPI has a series of distinctive features that make it especially apt in meeting this goal. Children are able articulate their views on a particular topic and this is supported by the structure of the dialogue itself. In addition, though, their statements must build on previous statements by demonstrating dis/agreement and the participants must provide reasons to justify that dis/agreement. The method also emphasises the primacy of the children’s thinking and the facilitator works to juxtapose speakers in order to drive the dialogue further philosophically. In this chapter, these features of CoPI are illustrated by examples from dialogues on the Good Life, stimulated by the question {"}What kind of society would you like to live in?{"} CoPI is shown to give children voice with a view to promoting their participation in society while also eschewing the imbalance in the adult/child power relationship. Here, we see what is important to children in the lives they want to live, for themselves and for those around them. What is of particular interest is the manner in which the children appear to collude with the adult/child power divide in how they talk about the kind of society in which they’d like to live.",
keywords = "children's participation, philosophy with children, childhood, children's voice, good life, marginalization of young people",
author = "Sarah-Jane Conrad and Claire Cassidy and Christian Mathis",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-13431-4",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319134307",
pages = "109--124",
editor = "Jorg Tremmel and Mason, {Antony } and {Haakenstad Godli}, Petter and Igor Dimitrijoski",
booktitle = "Youth Quotas and Other Efficient Forms of Youth Participation in Ageing Societies",
publisher = "Springer",

}

Conrad, S-J, Cassidy, C & Mathis, C 2015, Encouraging and supporting children's voices. in J Tremmel, A Mason, P Haakenstad Godli & I Dimitrijoski (eds), Youth Quotas and Other Efficient Forms of Youth Participation in Ageing Societies. Springer, Cham, pp. 109-124. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13431-4

Encouraging and supporting children's voices. / Conrad, Sarah-Jane; Cassidy, Claire; Mathis, Christian.

Youth Quotas and Other Efficient Forms of Youth Participation in Ageing Societies. ed. / Jorg Tremmel; Antony Mason; Petter Haakenstad Godli; Igor Dimitrijoski. Cham : Springer, 2015. p. 109-124.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Encouraging and supporting children's voices

AU - Conrad, Sarah-Jane

AU - Cassidy, Claire

AU - Mathis, Christian

PY - 2015/3/31

Y1 - 2015/3/31

N2 - Children are considered not to be full members of society and that their participation should be limited. Further, that this limitation is imposed by adults. In order to counter these views it is key to afford space for children’s voices and that these are facilitated in some way. Philosophy with Children, in all its variety of approaches and practices, lays claim to being a tool that allows children to develop the skills necessary for citizenship such as participation and airing their views. The chapter focuses on the role of Community of Philosophical Inquiry (CoPI), a specific method of practical philosophy with children, to empower children and give them a voice. CoPI has a series of distinctive features that make it especially apt in meeting this goal. Children are able articulate their views on a particular topic and this is supported by the structure of the dialogue itself. In addition, though, their statements must build on previous statements by demonstrating dis/agreement and the participants must provide reasons to justify that dis/agreement. The method also emphasises the primacy of the children’s thinking and the facilitator works to juxtapose speakers in order to drive the dialogue further philosophically. In this chapter, these features of CoPI are illustrated by examples from dialogues on the Good Life, stimulated by the question "What kind of society would you like to live in?" CoPI is shown to give children voice with a view to promoting their participation in society while also eschewing the imbalance in the adult/child power relationship. Here, we see what is important to children in the lives they want to live, for themselves and for those around them. What is of particular interest is the manner in which the children appear to collude with the adult/child power divide in how they talk about the kind of society in which they’d like to live.

AB - Children are considered not to be full members of society and that their participation should be limited. Further, that this limitation is imposed by adults. In order to counter these views it is key to afford space for children’s voices and that these are facilitated in some way. Philosophy with Children, in all its variety of approaches and practices, lays claim to being a tool that allows children to develop the skills necessary for citizenship such as participation and airing their views. The chapter focuses on the role of Community of Philosophical Inquiry (CoPI), a specific method of practical philosophy with children, to empower children and give them a voice. CoPI has a series of distinctive features that make it especially apt in meeting this goal. Children are able articulate their views on a particular topic and this is supported by the structure of the dialogue itself. In addition, though, their statements must build on previous statements by demonstrating dis/agreement and the participants must provide reasons to justify that dis/agreement. The method also emphasises the primacy of the children’s thinking and the facilitator works to juxtapose speakers in order to drive the dialogue further philosophically. In this chapter, these features of CoPI are illustrated by examples from dialogues on the Good Life, stimulated by the question "What kind of society would you like to live in?" CoPI is shown to give children voice with a view to promoting their participation in society while also eschewing the imbalance in the adult/child power relationship. Here, we see what is important to children in the lives they want to live, for themselves and for those around them. What is of particular interest is the manner in which the children appear to collude with the adult/child power divide in how they talk about the kind of society in which they’d like to live.

KW - children's participation

KW - philosophy with children

KW - childhood

KW - children's voice

KW - good life

KW - marginalization of young people

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-13431-4

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-13431-4

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783319134307

SN - 9783319383125

SP - 109

EP - 124

BT - Youth Quotas and Other Efficient Forms of Youth Participation in Ageing Societies

A2 - Tremmel, Jorg

A2 - Mason, Antony

A2 - Haakenstad Godli, Petter

A2 - Dimitrijoski, Igor

PB - Springer

CY - Cham

ER -

Conrad S-J, Cassidy C, Mathis C. Encouraging and supporting children's voices. In Tremmel J, Mason A, Haakenstad Godli P, Dimitrijoski I, editors, Youth Quotas and Other Efficient Forms of Youth Participation in Ageing Societies. Cham: Springer. 2015. p. 109-124 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13431-4