Abstract
| Language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Youth Quotas and Other Efficient Forms of Youth Participation in Ageing Societies |
| Editors | Jorg Tremmel, Antony Mason, Petter Haakenstad Godli, Igor Dimitrijoski |
| Place of Publication | Cham |
| Publisher | Springer |
| Pages | 109-124 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783319134307, 9783319383125 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 31 Mar 2015 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- children's participation
- philosophy with children
- childhood
- children's voice
- good life
- marginalization of young people
Cite this
}
Encouraging and supporting children's voices. / Conrad, Sarah-Jane; Cassidy, Claire; Mathis, Christian.
Youth Quotas and Other Efficient Forms of Youth Participation in Ageing Societies. ed. / Jorg Tremmel; Antony Mason; Petter Haakenstad Godli; Igor Dimitrijoski. Cham : Springer, 2015. p. 109-124.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter
TY - CHAP
T1 - Encouraging and supporting children's voices
AU - Conrad, Sarah-Jane
AU - Cassidy, Claire
AU - Mathis, Christian
PY - 2015/3/31
Y1 - 2015/3/31
N2 - Children are considered not to be full members of society and that their participation should be limited. Further, that this limitation is imposed by adults. In order to counter these views it is key to afford space for children’s voices and that these are facilitated in some way. Philosophy with Children, in all its variety of approaches and practices, lays claim to being a tool that allows children to develop the skills necessary for citizenship such as participation and airing their views. The chapter focuses on the role of Community of Philosophical Inquiry (CoPI), a specific method of practical philosophy with children, to empower children and give them a voice. CoPI has a series of distinctive features that make it especially apt in meeting this goal. Children are able articulate their views on a particular topic and this is supported by the structure of the dialogue itself. In addition, though, their statements must build on previous statements by demonstrating dis/agreement and the participants must provide reasons to justify that dis/agreement. The method also emphasises the primacy of the children’s thinking and the facilitator works to juxtapose speakers in order to drive the dialogue further philosophically. In this chapter, these features of CoPI are illustrated by examples from dialogues on the Good Life, stimulated by the question "What kind of society would you like to live in?" CoPI is shown to give children voice with a view to promoting their participation in society while also eschewing the imbalance in the adult/child power relationship. Here, we see what is important to children in the lives they want to live, for themselves and for those around them. What is of particular interest is the manner in which the children appear to collude with the adult/child power divide in how they talk about the kind of society in which they’d like to live.
AB - Children are considered not to be full members of society and that their participation should be limited. Further, that this limitation is imposed by adults. In order to counter these views it is key to afford space for children’s voices and that these are facilitated in some way. Philosophy with Children, in all its variety of approaches and practices, lays claim to being a tool that allows children to develop the skills necessary for citizenship such as participation and airing their views. The chapter focuses on the role of Community of Philosophical Inquiry (CoPI), a specific method of practical philosophy with children, to empower children and give them a voice. CoPI has a series of distinctive features that make it especially apt in meeting this goal. Children are able articulate their views on a particular topic and this is supported by the structure of the dialogue itself. In addition, though, their statements must build on previous statements by demonstrating dis/agreement and the participants must provide reasons to justify that dis/agreement. The method also emphasises the primacy of the children’s thinking and the facilitator works to juxtapose speakers in order to drive the dialogue further philosophically. In this chapter, these features of CoPI are illustrated by examples from dialogues on the Good Life, stimulated by the question "What kind of society would you like to live in?" CoPI is shown to give children voice with a view to promoting their participation in society while also eschewing the imbalance in the adult/child power relationship. Here, we see what is important to children in the lives they want to live, for themselves and for those around them. What is of particular interest is the manner in which the children appear to collude with the adult/child power divide in how they talk about the kind of society in which they’d like to live.
KW - children's participation
KW - philosophy with children
KW - childhood
KW - children's voice
KW - good life
KW - marginalization of young people
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-13431-4
DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-13431-4
M3 - Chapter
SN - 9783319134307
SN - 9783319383125
SP - 109
EP - 124
BT - Youth Quotas and Other Efficient Forms of Youth Participation in Ageing Societies
A2 - Tremmel, Jorg
A2 - Mason, Antony
A2 - Haakenstad Godli, Petter
A2 - Dimitrijoski, Igor
PB - Springer
CY - Cham
ER -