Employee participation and involvement: Experiences of aerospace and automobile workers in the UK and Italy

Mike Richardson, Andy Danford, P. Stewart, Valeria Pulignano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For most of the past century, assessing the form, significance and outcomes of employee participation and involvement (EPI) schemes has exercised the minds of academics and practitioners alike. A common line of inquiry concerns the question of whether employers adopting such schemes benefit from securing positive outcomes, such as greater employee commitment, enhanced organizational performance and a reduction in industrial conflict We have to look back to the 1960s and 1970s in particular, when calls for greater industrial democracy from workers and unions were prevalent, to find debates that are concerned with workers' aspirations as well as employers. Poole's (1975) study of workers' participation argued that the form, extent, scope and range of employee participation in the workplace are key factors in assessing EPI as they reflect the basic power processes in society, and are strongly affected by shifts in capital's power advantage over labour.
LanguageEnglish
Pages21-37
Number of pages17
JournalEuropean Journal of Industrial Relations
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2010

Fingerprint

Automobiles
Personnel
Workers
Employee participation
Employee involvement
Italy
Automobile
Aerospace
Employers
Work place
Organizational performance
Labor
Worker participation
Factors
Employee commitment
Industrial democracy
Industrial conflict
Aspiration

Keywords

  • employee participation
  • involvement
  • UK aerospace workers
  • UK automobile workers
  • Italian workers
  • lean production
  • indirect influence

Cite this

Richardson, Mike ; Danford, Andy ; Stewart, P. ; Pulignano, Valeria. / Employee participation and involvement : Experiences of aerospace and automobile workers in the UK and Italy. In: European Journal of Industrial Relations. 2010 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 21-37.
@article{e88c90a93c954b6896f352675f6d4ad0,
title = "Employee participation and involvement: Experiences of aerospace and automobile workers in the UK and Italy",
abstract = "For most of the past century, assessing the form, significance and outcomes of employee participation and involvement (EPI) schemes has exercised the minds of academics and practitioners alike. A common line of inquiry concerns the question of whether employers adopting such schemes benefit from securing positive outcomes, such as greater employee commitment, enhanced organizational performance and a reduction in industrial conflict We have to look back to the 1960s and 1970s in particular, when calls for greater industrial democracy from workers and unions were prevalent, to find debates that are concerned with workers' aspirations as well as employers. Poole's (1975) study of workers' participation argued that the form, extent, scope and range of employee participation in the workplace are key factors in assessing EPI as they reflect the basic power processes in society, and are strongly affected by shifts in capital's power advantage over labour.",
keywords = "employee participation, involvement, UK aerospace workers, UK automobile workers, Italian workers, lean production, indirect influence",
author = "Mike Richardson and Andy Danford and P. Stewart and Valeria Pulignano",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1177/0959680109355309",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "21--37",
journal = "European Journal of Industrial Relations",
issn = "0959-6801",
number = "1",

}

Employee participation and involvement : Experiences of aerospace and automobile workers in the UK and Italy. / Richardson, Mike; Danford, Andy; Stewart, P.; Pulignano, Valeria.

In: European Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 16, No. 1, 03.2010, p. 21-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Employee participation and involvement

T2 - European Journal of Industrial Relations

AU - Richardson, Mike

AU - Danford, Andy

AU - Stewart, P.

AU - Pulignano, Valeria

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - For most of the past century, assessing the form, significance and outcomes of employee participation and involvement (EPI) schemes has exercised the minds of academics and practitioners alike. A common line of inquiry concerns the question of whether employers adopting such schemes benefit from securing positive outcomes, such as greater employee commitment, enhanced organizational performance and a reduction in industrial conflict We have to look back to the 1960s and 1970s in particular, when calls for greater industrial democracy from workers and unions were prevalent, to find debates that are concerned with workers' aspirations as well as employers. Poole's (1975) study of workers' participation argued that the form, extent, scope and range of employee participation in the workplace are key factors in assessing EPI as they reflect the basic power processes in society, and are strongly affected by shifts in capital's power advantage over labour.

AB - For most of the past century, assessing the form, significance and outcomes of employee participation and involvement (EPI) schemes has exercised the minds of academics and practitioners alike. A common line of inquiry concerns the question of whether employers adopting such schemes benefit from securing positive outcomes, such as greater employee commitment, enhanced organizational performance and a reduction in industrial conflict We have to look back to the 1960s and 1970s in particular, when calls for greater industrial democracy from workers and unions were prevalent, to find debates that are concerned with workers' aspirations as well as employers. Poole's (1975) study of workers' participation argued that the form, extent, scope and range of employee participation in the workplace are key factors in assessing EPI as they reflect the basic power processes in society, and are strongly affected by shifts in capital's power advantage over labour.

KW - employee participation

KW - involvement

KW - UK aerospace workers

KW - UK automobile workers

KW - Italian workers

KW - lean production

KW - indirect influence

U2 - 10.1177/0959680109355309

DO - 10.1177/0959680109355309

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 21

EP - 37

JO - European Journal of Industrial Relations

JF - European Journal of Industrial Relations

SN - 0959-6801

IS - 1

ER -