Elicitation of structured engineering judgement to inform a focussed FMEA

M. Balderstone, J.L. Quigley, L.A. Walls

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

The practical use of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) has been criticised
because it is often implemented too late and in a manner that does not allow
information to be fed-back to inform the product design. Lessons learnt from the use of elicitation methods to gather structured expert judgement about engineering concerns for a new product design has led to an enhancement of the approach for implementing design and process FMEA. We refer to this variant as a focussed FMEA since the goal is to enable relevant engineers to contribute to the analysis and to act upon the outcomes in such a way that all activities focus upon the design needs. The paper begins with a review of the proposed process to identify and quantify engineering concerns. The pros and cons of using elicitation methods, originally designed to support construction of a Bayesian prior, to inform a focussed FMEA are analysed and a comparison of the proposed process in relation to the existing standards is made. An industrial example is presented to illustrate customisation of the process and discuss the impact on the design process.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-11
Number of pages11
Publication statusPublished - 2005
Event16th ARTS Conference - Loughborough, United Kingdom
Duration: 12 Apr 200514 Apr 2005

Conference

Conference16th ARTS Conference
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityLoughborough
Period12/04/0514/04/05

Fingerprint

Failure modes and effects analysis
Product design
Enhancement
Customization
Design process
Engineers
Expert judgment
New products

Keywords

  • structured engineering
  • Failures Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
  • product design
  • Bayesian model

Cite this

Balderstone, M., Quigley, J. L., & Walls, L. A. (2005). Elicitation of structured engineering judgement to inform a focussed FMEA. 1-11. Paper presented at 16th ARTS Conference, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
Balderstone, M. ; Quigley, J.L. ; Walls, L.A. / Elicitation of structured engineering judgement to inform a focussed FMEA. Paper presented at 16th ARTS Conference, Loughborough, United Kingdom.11 p.
@conference{9c978c36d4bc4dcba30278b27fb4ee30,
title = "Elicitation of structured engineering judgement to inform a focussed FMEA",
abstract = "The practical use of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) has been criticised because it is often implemented too late and in a manner that does not allow information to be fed-back to inform the product design. Lessons learnt from the use of elicitation methods to gather structured expert judgement about engineering concerns for a new product design has led to an enhancement of the approach for implementing design and process FMEA. We refer to this variant as a focussed FMEA since the goal is to enable relevant engineers to contribute to the analysis and to act upon the outcomes in such a way that all activities focus upon the design needs. The paper begins with a review of the proposed process to identify and quantify engineering concerns. The pros and cons of using elicitation methods, originally designed to support construction of a Bayesian prior, to inform a focussed FMEA are analysed and a comparison of the proposed process in relation to the existing standards is made. An industrial example is presented to illustrate customisation of the process and discuss the impact on the design process.",
keywords = "structured engineering, Failures Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), product design, Bayesian model",
author = "M. Balderstone and J.L. Quigley and L.A. Walls",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
pages = "1--11",
note = "16th ARTS Conference ; Conference date: 12-04-2005 Through 14-04-2005",

}

Balderstone, M, Quigley, JL & Walls, LA 2005, 'Elicitation of structured engineering judgement to inform a focussed FMEA' Paper presented at 16th ARTS Conference, Loughborough, United Kingdom, 12/04/05 - 14/04/05, pp. 1-11.

Elicitation of structured engineering judgement to inform a focussed FMEA. / Balderstone, M.; Quigley, J.L.; Walls, L.A.

2005. 1-11 Paper presented at 16th ARTS Conference, Loughborough, United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - Elicitation of structured engineering judgement to inform a focussed FMEA

AU - Balderstone, M.

AU - Quigley, J.L.

AU - Walls, L.A.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - The practical use of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) has been criticised because it is often implemented too late and in a manner that does not allow information to be fed-back to inform the product design. Lessons learnt from the use of elicitation methods to gather structured expert judgement about engineering concerns for a new product design has led to an enhancement of the approach for implementing design and process FMEA. We refer to this variant as a focussed FMEA since the goal is to enable relevant engineers to contribute to the analysis and to act upon the outcomes in such a way that all activities focus upon the design needs. The paper begins with a review of the proposed process to identify and quantify engineering concerns. The pros and cons of using elicitation methods, originally designed to support construction of a Bayesian prior, to inform a focussed FMEA are analysed and a comparison of the proposed process in relation to the existing standards is made. An industrial example is presented to illustrate customisation of the process and discuss the impact on the design process.

AB - The practical use of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) has been criticised because it is often implemented too late and in a manner that does not allow information to be fed-back to inform the product design. Lessons learnt from the use of elicitation methods to gather structured expert judgement about engineering concerns for a new product design has led to an enhancement of the approach for implementing design and process FMEA. We refer to this variant as a focussed FMEA since the goal is to enable relevant engineers to contribute to the analysis and to act upon the outcomes in such a way that all activities focus upon the design needs. The paper begins with a review of the proposed process to identify and quantify engineering concerns. The pros and cons of using elicitation methods, originally designed to support construction of a Bayesian prior, to inform a focussed FMEA are analysed and a comparison of the proposed process in relation to the existing standards is made. An industrial example is presented to illustrate customisation of the process and discuss the impact on the design process.

KW - structured engineering

KW - Failures Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)

KW - product design

KW - Bayesian model

M3 - Paper

SP - 1

EP - 11

ER -

Balderstone M, Quigley JL, Walls LA. Elicitation of structured engineering judgement to inform a focussed FMEA. 2005. Paper presented at 16th ARTS Conference, Loughborough, United Kingdom.