Electronic monitoring in Scotland 1998 - 2006

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    94 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The electronic monitoring (EM) of offenders originated in the USA and grew steadily across Europe and rest of the world during the1990s (Ball, Huff and Lilly 1988; Mayer, Haverkamp and Levy 2003). Electronically monitored Restriction of Liberty Orders (RLOs) were introduced in Scotland by the Crime and Punishment (Scotland) Act 1997 in the last days of a Conservative administration (Scottish Office 1996). They were part of a general strategy intended to strengthen existing forms of community supervision, to increase public and judicial confidence in such supervision and thereby to improve public protection. However, as McAra (1999) notes, there was still significant deference in the Conservative strategy to the humanistic, “penal welfare” values so staunchly upheld by Scottish crime policy networks since the 1960s, which had both survived the encroaching “culture of control” (Garland 2001), and bestowed a distinctive “tartan” slant on several indigenous criminal justice institutions. Until recently, the congruence or otherwise of EM with the enduring Scottish inflection
    on penal welfare values has been at the heart of all arguments about it in
    Scotland, although, tentatively, it might now be suggested that the questions
    are changing.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)74-96
    Number of pages23
    JournalScottish Journal of Criminal Justice Studies
    Volume12
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2006

    Fingerprint

    supervision
    welfare
    offense
    electronics
    monitoring
    Values
    offender
    penalty
    confidence
    justice
    act
    community

    Keywords

    • electronic monitoring
    • criminal justice system
    • community supervision

    Cite this

    @article{94bbafd40fd44e1d97a69e652b5ddf7f,
    title = "Electronic monitoring in Scotland 1998 - 2006",
    abstract = "The electronic monitoring (EM) of offenders originated in the USA and grew steadily across Europe and rest of the world during the1990s (Ball, Huff and Lilly 1988; Mayer, Haverkamp and Levy 2003). Electronically monitored Restriction of Liberty Orders (RLOs) were introduced in Scotland by the Crime and Punishment (Scotland) Act 1997 in the last days of a Conservative administration (Scottish Office 1996). They were part of a general strategy intended to strengthen existing forms of community supervision, to increase public and judicial confidence in such supervision and thereby to improve public protection. However, as McAra (1999) notes, there was still significant deference in the Conservative strategy to the humanistic, “penal welfare” values so staunchly upheld by Scottish crime policy networks since the 1960s, which had both survived the encroaching “culture of control” (Garland 2001), and bestowed a distinctive “tartan” slant on several indigenous criminal justice institutions. Until recently, the congruence or otherwise of EM with the enduring Scottish inflection on penal welfare values has been at the heart of all arguments about it in Scotland, although, tentatively, it might now be suggested that the questions are changing.",
    keywords = "electronic monitoring, criminal justice system, community supervision",
    author = "M. Nellis",
    year = "2006",
    month = "7",
    language = "English",
    volume = "12",
    pages = "74--96",
    journal = "Scottish Journal of Criminal Justice Studies",
    issn = "1360-4449",

    }

    Electronic monitoring in Scotland 1998 - 2006. / Nellis, M.

    In: Scottish Journal of Criminal Justice Studies, Vol. 12, 07.2006, p. 74-96.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Electronic monitoring in Scotland 1998 - 2006

    AU - Nellis, M.

    PY - 2006/7

    Y1 - 2006/7

    N2 - The electronic monitoring (EM) of offenders originated in the USA and grew steadily across Europe and rest of the world during the1990s (Ball, Huff and Lilly 1988; Mayer, Haverkamp and Levy 2003). Electronically monitored Restriction of Liberty Orders (RLOs) were introduced in Scotland by the Crime and Punishment (Scotland) Act 1997 in the last days of a Conservative administration (Scottish Office 1996). They were part of a general strategy intended to strengthen existing forms of community supervision, to increase public and judicial confidence in such supervision and thereby to improve public protection. However, as McAra (1999) notes, there was still significant deference in the Conservative strategy to the humanistic, “penal welfare” values so staunchly upheld by Scottish crime policy networks since the 1960s, which had both survived the encroaching “culture of control” (Garland 2001), and bestowed a distinctive “tartan” slant on several indigenous criminal justice institutions. Until recently, the congruence or otherwise of EM with the enduring Scottish inflection on penal welfare values has been at the heart of all arguments about it in Scotland, although, tentatively, it might now be suggested that the questions are changing.

    AB - The electronic monitoring (EM) of offenders originated in the USA and grew steadily across Europe and rest of the world during the1990s (Ball, Huff and Lilly 1988; Mayer, Haverkamp and Levy 2003). Electronically monitored Restriction of Liberty Orders (RLOs) were introduced in Scotland by the Crime and Punishment (Scotland) Act 1997 in the last days of a Conservative administration (Scottish Office 1996). They were part of a general strategy intended to strengthen existing forms of community supervision, to increase public and judicial confidence in such supervision and thereby to improve public protection. However, as McAra (1999) notes, there was still significant deference in the Conservative strategy to the humanistic, “penal welfare” values so staunchly upheld by Scottish crime policy networks since the 1960s, which had both survived the encroaching “culture of control” (Garland 2001), and bestowed a distinctive “tartan” slant on several indigenous criminal justice institutions. Until recently, the congruence or otherwise of EM with the enduring Scottish inflection on penal welfare values has been at the heart of all arguments about it in Scotland, although, tentatively, it might now be suggested that the questions are changing.

    KW - electronic monitoring

    KW - criminal justice system

    KW - community supervision

    UR - http://www.sastudyoffending.org.uk/Journal2006.pdf

    M3 - Article

    VL - 12

    SP - 74

    EP - 96

    JO - Scottish Journal of Criminal Justice Studies

    JF - Scottish Journal of Criminal Justice Studies

    SN - 1360-4449

    ER -