Electoral poachers? an assessment of shadowing behaviour in the Scottish parliament

M.P. Shephard, C.J. Carman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The mixed member electoral system used for the Scottish Parliament has produced two kinds of parliamentarians - those elected to represent constituencies (constituency members) and those elected to represent regions (list members). This system has created the possibility that list members might shadow constituency members with the intention of contesting the constituency seat in the next election. One manifestation of this is where list members locate their offices. Existing research on the shadowing of constituency members by list members has focused on the opinions of samples of members. In this paper we measure the behaviour of all members to examine the question of whether, how, and why list members shadow constituency members through the location of their offices. Among a number of findings, we provide evidence that list members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) are significantly more likely to locate offices in most marginal constituencies, suggesting that electoral poaching is a feature of the system.
LanguageEnglish
Pages483-496
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Legislative Studies
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

parliament
electoral system
election

Keywords

  • shadowing
  • scottish parliament
  • politics
  • government
  • lobby groups
  • electoral system

Cite this

@article{e7e191873a154a878da1c65f5444c424,
title = "Electoral poachers? an assessment of shadowing behaviour in the Scottish parliament",
abstract = "The mixed member electoral system used for the Scottish Parliament has produced two kinds of parliamentarians - those elected to represent constituencies (constituency members) and those elected to represent regions (list members). This system has created the possibility that list members might shadow constituency members with the intention of contesting the constituency seat in the next election. One manifestation of this is where list members locate their offices. Existing research on the shadowing of constituency members by list members has focused on the opinions of samples of members. In this paper we measure the behaviour of all members to examine the question of whether, how, and why list members shadow constituency members through the location of their offices. Among a number of findings, we provide evidence that list members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) are significantly more likely to locate offices in most marginal constituencies, suggesting that electoral poaching is a feature of the system.",
keywords = "shadowing, scottish parliament, politics, government, lobby groups, electoral system",
author = "M.P. Shephard and C.J. Carman",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1080/13572330701663587",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "483--496",
journal = "Journal of Legislative Studies",
issn = "1357-2334",
number = "4",

}

Electoral poachers? an assessment of shadowing behaviour in the Scottish parliament. / Shephard, M.P.; Carman, C.J.

In: Journal of Legislative Studies, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2007, p. 483-496.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electoral poachers? an assessment of shadowing behaviour in the Scottish parliament

AU - Shephard, M.P.

AU - Carman, C.J.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - The mixed member electoral system used for the Scottish Parliament has produced two kinds of parliamentarians - those elected to represent constituencies (constituency members) and those elected to represent regions (list members). This system has created the possibility that list members might shadow constituency members with the intention of contesting the constituency seat in the next election. One manifestation of this is where list members locate their offices. Existing research on the shadowing of constituency members by list members has focused on the opinions of samples of members. In this paper we measure the behaviour of all members to examine the question of whether, how, and why list members shadow constituency members through the location of their offices. Among a number of findings, we provide evidence that list members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) are significantly more likely to locate offices in most marginal constituencies, suggesting that electoral poaching is a feature of the system.

AB - The mixed member electoral system used for the Scottish Parliament has produced two kinds of parliamentarians - those elected to represent constituencies (constituency members) and those elected to represent regions (list members). This system has created the possibility that list members might shadow constituency members with the intention of contesting the constituency seat in the next election. One manifestation of this is where list members locate their offices. Existing research on the shadowing of constituency members by list members has focused on the opinions of samples of members. In this paper we measure the behaviour of all members to examine the question of whether, how, and why list members shadow constituency members through the location of their offices. Among a number of findings, we provide evidence that list members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) are significantly more likely to locate offices in most marginal constituencies, suggesting that electoral poaching is a feature of the system.

KW - shadowing

KW - scottish parliament

KW - politics

KW - government

KW - lobby groups

KW - electoral system

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13572330701663587

U2 - 10.1080/13572330701663587

DO - 10.1080/13572330701663587

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 483

EP - 496

JO - Journal of Legislative Studies

T2 - Journal of Legislative Studies

JF - Journal of Legislative Studies

SN - 1357-2334

IS - 4

ER -