Effects of order of mention and grammatical role on anaphor resolution

Kumiko Fukumura, Roger P. G. van Gompel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A controversial issue in anaphoric processing has been whether processing preferences of anaphoric expressions are affected by the antecedent’s grammatical role or surface position. Using eye tracking, Experiment 1 examined the comprehension of pronouns during reading, which revealed shorter reading times in the pronoun region and later regions when the antecedent was the subject than when it was the prepositional object. There was no effect of antecedent position. Experiment 2 showed that the choice between pronouns and repeated names during language production is also primarily affected by the antecedent’s grammatical role. Experiment 3 examined the comprehension of repeated names, showing a clear effect of antecedent position. Reading times in the name region and in later regions were longer when the antecedent was 1st mentioned than 2nd mentioned, whereas the antecedent’s grammatical role only affected regression measures in the name region, showing more processing difficulty with a subject than prepositional-object antecedent. Thus, the processing of pronouns is primarily driven by antecedent grammatical role rather than position, whereas the processing of repeated names is most strongly affected by position, suggesting that different representations and processing constraints underlie the processing of pronouns and names.
LanguageEnglish
Pages501-525
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Volume41
Issue number2
Early online date28 Jul 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2015

Fingerprint

Names
Reading
experiment
comprehension
Anaphor Resolution
Language
regression
language
Pronoun
time
Experiment

Keywords

  • anaphor
  • pronoun
  • repeated names
  • discourse
  • language comprehension

Cite this

@article{c2e4d3e4864b4f3ba342ff16240218f7,
title = "Effects of order of mention and grammatical role on anaphor resolution",
abstract = "A controversial issue in anaphoric processing has been whether processing preferences of anaphoric expressions are affected by the antecedent’s grammatical role or surface position. Using eye tracking, Experiment 1 examined the comprehension of pronouns during reading, which revealed shorter reading times in the pronoun region and later regions when the antecedent was the subject than when it was the prepositional object. There was no effect of antecedent position. Experiment 2 showed that the choice between pronouns and repeated names during language production is also primarily affected by the antecedent’s grammatical role. Experiment 3 examined the comprehension of repeated names, showing a clear effect of antecedent position. Reading times in the name region and in later regions were longer when the antecedent was 1st mentioned than 2nd mentioned, whereas the antecedent’s grammatical role only affected regression measures in the name region, showing more processing difficulty with a subject than prepositional-object antecedent. Thus, the processing of pronouns is primarily driven by antecedent grammatical role rather than position, whereas the processing of repeated names is most strongly affected by position, suggesting that different representations and processing constraints underlie the processing of pronouns and names.",
keywords = "anaphor, pronoun, repeated names, discourse, language comprehension",
author = "Kumiko Fukumura and {van Gompel}, {Roger P. G.}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/xlm0000041",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "501--525",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition",
issn = "0278-7393",
number = "2",

}

Effects of order of mention and grammatical role on anaphor resolution. / Fukumura, Kumiko; van Gompel, Roger P. G.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , Vol. 41, No. 2, 01.03.2015, p. 501-525.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of order of mention and grammatical role on anaphor resolution

AU - Fukumura, Kumiko

AU - van Gompel, Roger P. G.

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - A controversial issue in anaphoric processing has been whether processing preferences of anaphoric expressions are affected by the antecedent’s grammatical role or surface position. Using eye tracking, Experiment 1 examined the comprehension of pronouns during reading, which revealed shorter reading times in the pronoun region and later regions when the antecedent was the subject than when it was the prepositional object. There was no effect of antecedent position. Experiment 2 showed that the choice between pronouns and repeated names during language production is also primarily affected by the antecedent’s grammatical role. Experiment 3 examined the comprehension of repeated names, showing a clear effect of antecedent position. Reading times in the name region and in later regions were longer when the antecedent was 1st mentioned than 2nd mentioned, whereas the antecedent’s grammatical role only affected regression measures in the name region, showing more processing difficulty with a subject than prepositional-object antecedent. Thus, the processing of pronouns is primarily driven by antecedent grammatical role rather than position, whereas the processing of repeated names is most strongly affected by position, suggesting that different representations and processing constraints underlie the processing of pronouns and names.

AB - A controversial issue in anaphoric processing has been whether processing preferences of anaphoric expressions are affected by the antecedent’s grammatical role or surface position. Using eye tracking, Experiment 1 examined the comprehension of pronouns during reading, which revealed shorter reading times in the pronoun region and later regions when the antecedent was the subject than when it was the prepositional object. There was no effect of antecedent position. Experiment 2 showed that the choice between pronouns and repeated names during language production is also primarily affected by the antecedent’s grammatical role. Experiment 3 examined the comprehension of repeated names, showing a clear effect of antecedent position. Reading times in the name region and in later regions were longer when the antecedent was 1st mentioned than 2nd mentioned, whereas the antecedent’s grammatical role only affected regression measures in the name region, showing more processing difficulty with a subject than prepositional-object antecedent. Thus, the processing of pronouns is primarily driven by antecedent grammatical role rather than position, whereas the processing of repeated names is most strongly affected by position, suggesting that different representations and processing constraints underlie the processing of pronouns and names.

KW - anaphor

KW - pronoun

KW - repeated names

KW - discourse

KW - language comprehension

UR - http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/xlm/

U2 - 10.1037/xlm0000041

DO - 10.1037/xlm0000041

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 501

EP - 525

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

T2 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

SN - 0278-7393

IS - 2

ER -