Effect of body composition on the validity and reliability of an electronic pedometer

C Gardner, J Herd, Alison Kirk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of body composition and pedometer position on the
validity and reliability of a pedometer. 52 adults (24F, 28M, BMI range 21-52kg/m2)
participated. Body composition was measured by BMI, waist to hip ratio and percentage body fat and categorised as: 1.) normal, 2.) overweight, 3.) obese I, and 4.) obese II (BMI only). Participants wore 4 pedometers (front (2), side and back) on their right side at waist level. Participants completed a 40 metre walking course at a slow, moderate and brisk walk on two occasions. Pedometer steps were compared to steps recorded by direct observation. For normal weight participants no differences were found between observed and pedometer steps (p>0.01). Among overweight participants, there was a difference (p<0.01) between observed and pedometer steps during slow walking in the back position. Obese I and II participants had differences (p<0.01) between observed and pedometer steps during slow (and moderate for obese I) walking in the side position. No differences were found between pedometer steps recorded during test 1 and 2. In conclusion, no significant differences were found across all body compositions, and for all walking speeds, between observed and pedometer-measured steps when the pedometer was worn in the front position.
LanguageEnglish
Pages28-37
Number of pages10
JournalCARE
Volume1
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Body Composition
Reproducibility of Results
Walking
Waist-Hip Ratio
Adipose Tissue
Observation
Weights and Measures

Keywords

  • pedometer
  • clinical populations
  • body composition
  • validity
  • reliability

Cite this

@article{5f9cf66608234c4bb7b23f022d3f6ebd,
title = "Effect of body composition on the validity and reliability of an electronic pedometer",
abstract = "This paper examines the effect of body composition and pedometer position on thevalidity and reliability of a pedometer. 52 adults (24F, 28M, BMI range 21-52kg/m2)participated. Body composition was measured by BMI, waist to hip ratio and percentage body fat and categorised as: 1.) normal, 2.) overweight, 3.) obese I, and 4.) obese II (BMI only). Participants wore 4 pedometers (front (2), side and back) on their right side at waist level. Participants completed a 40 metre walking course at a slow, moderate and brisk walk on two occasions. Pedometer steps were compared to steps recorded by direct observation. For normal weight participants no differences were found between observed and pedometer steps (p>0.01). Among overweight participants, there was a difference (p<0.01) between observed and pedometer steps during slow walking in the back position. Obese I and II participants had differences (p<0.01) between observed and pedometer steps during slow (and moderate for obese I) walking in the side position. No differences were found between pedometer steps recorded during test 1 and 2. In conclusion, no significant differences were found across all body compositions, and for all walking speeds, between observed and pedometer-measured steps when the pedometer was worn in the front position.",
keywords = "pedometer, clinical populations, body composition, validity, reliability",
author = "C Gardner and J Herd and Alison Kirk",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "28--37",
journal = "CARE",
number = "1",

}

Effect of body composition on the validity and reliability of an electronic pedometer. / Gardner, C; Herd, J; Kirk, Alison.

In: CARE, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2007, p. 28-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of body composition on the validity and reliability of an electronic pedometer

AU - Gardner, C

AU - Herd, J

AU - Kirk, Alison

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This paper examines the effect of body composition and pedometer position on thevalidity and reliability of a pedometer. 52 adults (24F, 28M, BMI range 21-52kg/m2)participated. Body composition was measured by BMI, waist to hip ratio and percentage body fat and categorised as: 1.) normal, 2.) overweight, 3.) obese I, and 4.) obese II (BMI only). Participants wore 4 pedometers (front (2), side and back) on their right side at waist level. Participants completed a 40 metre walking course at a slow, moderate and brisk walk on two occasions. Pedometer steps were compared to steps recorded by direct observation. For normal weight participants no differences were found between observed and pedometer steps (p>0.01). Among overweight participants, there was a difference (p<0.01) between observed and pedometer steps during slow walking in the back position. Obese I and II participants had differences (p<0.01) between observed and pedometer steps during slow (and moderate for obese I) walking in the side position. No differences were found between pedometer steps recorded during test 1 and 2. In conclusion, no significant differences were found across all body compositions, and for all walking speeds, between observed and pedometer-measured steps when the pedometer was worn in the front position.

AB - This paper examines the effect of body composition and pedometer position on thevalidity and reliability of a pedometer. 52 adults (24F, 28M, BMI range 21-52kg/m2)participated. Body composition was measured by BMI, waist to hip ratio and percentage body fat and categorised as: 1.) normal, 2.) overweight, 3.) obese I, and 4.) obese II (BMI only). Participants wore 4 pedometers (front (2), side and back) on their right side at waist level. Participants completed a 40 metre walking course at a slow, moderate and brisk walk on two occasions. Pedometer steps were compared to steps recorded by direct observation. For normal weight participants no differences were found between observed and pedometer steps (p>0.01). Among overweight participants, there was a difference (p<0.01) between observed and pedometer steps during slow walking in the back position. Obese I and II participants had differences (p<0.01) between observed and pedometer steps during slow (and moderate for obese I) walking in the side position. No differences were found between pedometer steps recorded during test 1 and 2. In conclusion, no significant differences were found across all body compositions, and for all walking speeds, between observed and pedometer-measured steps when the pedometer was worn in the front position.

KW - pedometer

KW - clinical populations

KW - body composition

KW - validity

KW - reliability

UR - http://www.gcu.ac.uk/care/issuesarchive/issue1volume1/paper-5-effect-of-body-composition-on-the-validity-and-reliability-of-an-electronic-pedometer-8464.pdf

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 28

EP - 37

JO - CARE

T2 - CARE

JF - CARE

IS - 1

ER -