Educating child practitioners: a (re)turn to the university disciplines

Joan F. Forbes, Elspeth Mccartney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper analyses a specific disjunctive policy space in Scotland involving the current key children's social and educational policy agenda, Getting it Right for Every Child (GIRFEC), and a recent national report on teacher education, the ‘Donaldson Report’. In four main parts, the paper first introduces and applies in policy review and analysis a capitals frame to identify the policy–practice discontinuities currently inherent in the ‘GIRFEC-child practitioner education’ policy space, exemplified by the Donaldson Report. Then, the same capitals frame is applied to examine the capitals resources demanded in the particular ‘child–child practitioner education’ policy space previously delineated. Next, examples of policy disconnects amongst current child practice and practitioner education policy production and implementation, which warrant a concerted integrative cross-sector project to ensure coherent social and intellectual capital relations at all levels, are discussed. Finally, the paper calls for the governing professional registration bodies and universities involved in the education of child-sector practitioners to engage in the redesign of university programmes underpinned by principles of transdisciplinarity and transprofessionalism. The methodology is policy sociology and policy text analysis.
LanguageEnglish
Pages144-159
Number of pages16
JournalDiscourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education
Volume36
Issue number1
Early online date7 Jan 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

Fingerprint

university
Education
Policy Making
Economics
education
text analysis
Sociology
Scotland
Public Policy
educational policy
sociology
methodology
teacher

Keywords

  • child practitioners
  • education
  • university disciplines
  • Donaldson Report
  • Getting it Right for Every Child (GIRFEC)

Cite this

@article{c180575edd2641148e01dc237d788a5a,
title = "Educating child practitioners: a (re)turn to the university disciplines",
abstract = "This paper analyses a specific disjunctive policy space in Scotland involving the current key children's social and educational policy agenda, Getting it Right for Every Child (GIRFEC), and a recent national report on teacher education, the ‘Donaldson Report’. In four main parts, the paper first introduces and applies in policy review and analysis a capitals frame to identify the policy–practice discontinuities currently inherent in the ‘GIRFEC-child practitioner education’ policy space, exemplified by the Donaldson Report. Then, the same capitals frame is applied to examine the capitals resources demanded in the particular ‘child–child practitioner education’ policy space previously delineated. Next, examples of policy disconnects amongst current child practice and practitioner education policy production and implementation, which warrant a concerted integrative cross-sector project to ensure coherent social and intellectual capital relations at all levels, are discussed. Finally, the paper calls for the governing professional registration bodies and universities involved in the education of child-sector practitioners to engage in the redesign of university programmes underpinned by principles of transdisciplinarity and transprofessionalism. The methodology is policy sociology and policy text analysis.",
keywords = "child practitioners, education, university disciplines, Donaldson Report, Getting it Right for Every Child (GIRFEC)",
author = "Forbes, {Joan F.} and Elspeth Mccartney",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education on 07/01/2014, available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2013.871235.",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01596306.2013.871235",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "144--159",
journal = "Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education",
issn = "0159-6306",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Educating child practitioners : a (re)turn to the university disciplines. / Forbes, Joan F. ; Mccartney, Elspeth .

In: Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, Vol. 36, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 144-159.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Educating child practitioners

T2 - Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education

AU - Forbes, Joan F.

AU - Mccartney, Elspeth

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education on 07/01/2014, available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2013.871235.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - This paper analyses a specific disjunctive policy space in Scotland involving the current key children's social and educational policy agenda, Getting it Right for Every Child (GIRFEC), and a recent national report on teacher education, the ‘Donaldson Report’. In four main parts, the paper first introduces and applies in policy review and analysis a capitals frame to identify the policy–practice discontinuities currently inherent in the ‘GIRFEC-child practitioner education’ policy space, exemplified by the Donaldson Report. Then, the same capitals frame is applied to examine the capitals resources demanded in the particular ‘child–child practitioner education’ policy space previously delineated. Next, examples of policy disconnects amongst current child practice and practitioner education policy production and implementation, which warrant a concerted integrative cross-sector project to ensure coherent social and intellectual capital relations at all levels, are discussed. Finally, the paper calls for the governing professional registration bodies and universities involved in the education of child-sector practitioners to engage in the redesign of university programmes underpinned by principles of transdisciplinarity and transprofessionalism. The methodology is policy sociology and policy text analysis.

AB - This paper analyses a specific disjunctive policy space in Scotland involving the current key children's social and educational policy agenda, Getting it Right for Every Child (GIRFEC), and a recent national report on teacher education, the ‘Donaldson Report’. In four main parts, the paper first introduces and applies in policy review and analysis a capitals frame to identify the policy–practice discontinuities currently inherent in the ‘GIRFEC-child practitioner education’ policy space, exemplified by the Donaldson Report. Then, the same capitals frame is applied to examine the capitals resources demanded in the particular ‘child–child practitioner education’ policy space previously delineated. Next, examples of policy disconnects amongst current child practice and practitioner education policy production and implementation, which warrant a concerted integrative cross-sector project to ensure coherent social and intellectual capital relations at all levels, are discussed. Finally, the paper calls for the governing professional registration bodies and universities involved in the education of child-sector practitioners to engage in the redesign of university programmes underpinned by principles of transdisciplinarity and transprofessionalism. The methodology is policy sociology and policy text analysis.

KW - child practitioners

KW - education

KW - university disciplines

KW - Donaldson Report

KW - Getting it Right for Every Child (GIRFEC)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891803841&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01596306.2013.871235

DO - 10.1080/01596306.2013.871235

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 144

EP - 159

JO - Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education

JF - Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education

SN - 0159-6306

IS - 1

ER -