Economic models of search

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution book

Abstract

Searching is inherently an interactive process usually requiring a number of queries to be submitted and a number of documents to be assessed in order to find the desired amount of relevant information. While numerous models of search have been proposed, they have been largely conceptual in nature providing a descriptive account of the search process. For example, Bates' Berry Picking metaphor aptly describes how information seekers forage for relevant information [4]. However it lacks any predictive or explanatory power. In this talk, I will outline how microeconomic theory can be applied to interactive information retrieval, where the search process can be viewed as a combination of inputs (i.e. queries and assessments) which are used to "produce" output (i.e. relevance). Under this view, it is possible to build models that not only describe the relationship between interaction, cost and gain, but also explain and predict behaviour. During the talk, I will run through a number of examples of how economics can explain different behaviours. For example, why PhD students should search more than their supervisors (using an economic model developed by Cooper [6]), why queries are short [1], why Boolean searchers need to explore more results, and why it is okay to look at the first few results when searching the web [2]. I shall then describe how the cost of different interactions affect search behaviour [3], before extending the current theory to include other variables (such as the time spent on the search result page, the interaction with snippets, etc) to create more sophisticated and realistic models. Essentially, I will argue that by using such models we can:

1. theorise and predict how users will behave when interacting with systems,

2. ascertain how the costs of different interaction will influence search behaviour,

3. understand why particular interaction styles, strategies, techniques are or are not adopted by users, and,

4. determine what interactions and functionalities are worthwhile based on their expected gain and associated costs.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationADCS '13 Proceedings of the 18th Australasian Document Computing Symposium
Place of PublicationNew York, NY, USA
Pages1-1
Number of pages1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Dec 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

economic model
interaction
costs
microeconomics
information retrieval
functionality
metaphor
lack
economics
student

Keywords

  • information behaviours
  • retrieval strategies

Cite this

Azzopardi, L. (2013). Economic models of search. In ADCS '13 Proceedings of the 18th Australasian Document Computing Symposium (pp. 1-1). New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2537734.2537735
Azzopardi, Leif. / Economic models of search. ADCS '13 Proceedings of the 18th Australasian Document Computing Symposium. New York, NY, USA, 2013. pp. 1-1
@inproceedings{8e83faae60d64be2bad919a23241a10a,
title = "Economic models of search",
abstract = "Searching is inherently an interactive process usually requiring a number of queries to be submitted and a number of documents to be assessed in order to find the desired amount of relevant information. While numerous models of search have been proposed, they have been largely conceptual in nature providing a descriptive account of the search process. For example, Bates' Berry Picking metaphor aptly describes how information seekers forage for relevant information [4]. However it lacks any predictive or explanatory power. In this talk, I will outline how microeconomic theory can be applied to interactive information retrieval, where the search process can be viewed as a combination of inputs (i.e. queries and assessments) which are used to {"}produce{"} output (i.e. relevance). Under this view, it is possible to build models that not only describe the relationship between interaction, cost and gain, but also explain and predict behaviour. During the talk, I will run through a number of examples of how economics can explain different behaviours. For example, why PhD students should search more than their supervisors (using an economic model developed by Cooper [6]), why queries are short [1], why Boolean searchers need to explore more results, and why it is okay to look at the first few results when searching the web [2]. I shall then describe how the cost of different interactions affect search behaviour [3], before extending the current theory to include other variables (such as the time spent on the search result page, the interaction with snippets, etc) to create more sophisticated and realistic models. Essentially, I will argue that by using such models we can:1. theorise and predict how users will behave when interacting with systems,2. ascertain how the costs of different interaction will influence search behaviour,3. understand why particular interaction styles, strategies, techniques are or are not adopted by users, and,4. determine what interactions and functionalities are worthwhile based on their expected gain and associated costs.",
keywords = "information behaviours, retrieval strategies",
author = "Leif Azzopardi",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1145/2537734.2537735",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-4503-2524-0",
pages = "1--1",
booktitle = "ADCS '13 Proceedings of the 18th Australasian Document Computing Symposium",

}

Azzopardi, L 2013, Economic models of search. in ADCS '13 Proceedings of the 18th Australasian Document Computing Symposium. New York, NY, USA, pp. 1-1. https://doi.org/10.1145/2537734.2537735

Economic models of search. / Azzopardi, Leif.

ADCS '13 Proceedings of the 18th Australasian Document Computing Symposium. New York, NY, USA, 2013. p. 1-1.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution book

TY - GEN

T1 - Economic models of search

AU - Azzopardi, Leif

PY - 2013/12/5

Y1 - 2013/12/5

N2 - Searching is inherently an interactive process usually requiring a number of queries to be submitted and a number of documents to be assessed in order to find the desired amount of relevant information. While numerous models of search have been proposed, they have been largely conceptual in nature providing a descriptive account of the search process. For example, Bates' Berry Picking metaphor aptly describes how information seekers forage for relevant information [4]. However it lacks any predictive or explanatory power. In this talk, I will outline how microeconomic theory can be applied to interactive information retrieval, where the search process can be viewed as a combination of inputs (i.e. queries and assessments) which are used to "produce" output (i.e. relevance). Under this view, it is possible to build models that not only describe the relationship between interaction, cost and gain, but also explain and predict behaviour. During the talk, I will run through a number of examples of how economics can explain different behaviours. For example, why PhD students should search more than their supervisors (using an economic model developed by Cooper [6]), why queries are short [1], why Boolean searchers need to explore more results, and why it is okay to look at the first few results when searching the web [2]. I shall then describe how the cost of different interactions affect search behaviour [3], before extending the current theory to include other variables (such as the time spent on the search result page, the interaction with snippets, etc) to create more sophisticated and realistic models. Essentially, I will argue that by using such models we can:1. theorise and predict how users will behave when interacting with systems,2. ascertain how the costs of different interaction will influence search behaviour,3. understand why particular interaction styles, strategies, techniques are or are not adopted by users, and,4. determine what interactions and functionalities are worthwhile based on their expected gain and associated costs.

AB - Searching is inherently an interactive process usually requiring a number of queries to be submitted and a number of documents to be assessed in order to find the desired amount of relevant information. While numerous models of search have been proposed, they have been largely conceptual in nature providing a descriptive account of the search process. For example, Bates' Berry Picking metaphor aptly describes how information seekers forage for relevant information [4]. However it lacks any predictive or explanatory power. In this talk, I will outline how microeconomic theory can be applied to interactive information retrieval, where the search process can be viewed as a combination of inputs (i.e. queries and assessments) which are used to "produce" output (i.e. relevance). Under this view, it is possible to build models that not only describe the relationship between interaction, cost and gain, but also explain and predict behaviour. During the talk, I will run through a number of examples of how economics can explain different behaviours. For example, why PhD students should search more than their supervisors (using an economic model developed by Cooper [6]), why queries are short [1], why Boolean searchers need to explore more results, and why it is okay to look at the first few results when searching the web [2]. I shall then describe how the cost of different interactions affect search behaviour [3], before extending the current theory to include other variables (such as the time spent on the search result page, the interaction with snippets, etc) to create more sophisticated and realistic models. Essentially, I will argue that by using such models we can:1. theorise and predict how users will behave when interacting with systems,2. ascertain how the costs of different interaction will influence search behaviour,3. understand why particular interaction styles, strategies, techniques are or are not adopted by users, and,4. determine what interactions and functionalities are worthwhile based on their expected gain and associated costs.

KW - information behaviours

KW - retrieval strategies

U2 - 10.1145/2537734.2537735

DO - 10.1145/2537734.2537735

M3 - Conference contribution book

SN - 978-1-4503-2524-0

SP - 1

EP - 1

BT - ADCS '13 Proceedings of the 18th Australasian Document Computing Symposium

CY - New York, NY, USA

ER -

Azzopardi L. Economic models of search. In ADCS '13 Proceedings of the 18th Australasian Document Computing Symposium. New York, NY, USA. 2013. p. 1-1 https://doi.org/10.1145/2537734.2537735