'Economic Geometry': Marshall's and Other Early Representations of Demand and Supply

Roy Grieve

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Does an apparent (minor) anomaly, said to occur not infrequently in elementary expositions of supply and demand theory, really imply – as seems to be suggested – that there is something a bit odd about Marshall’s diagrammatic handling of demand and supply? On investigation, we find some interesting differences of focus and exposition amongst the theorists who first developed the ‘geometric’ treatment of demand and supply, but find no reason, despite his differences from other marginalist pioneers such as Cournot, Dupuit and Walras, to consider Marshall’s treatment either as unconventional or forced, or as to regard him as the ‘odd man out’.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationGlasgow
PublisherUniversity of Strathclyde
Pages1-29
Number of pages30
Volume08
Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • supply and demand
  • Marshallian economics
  • marshall

Cite this

Grieve, R. (2008). 'Economic Geometry': Marshall's and Other Early Representations of Demand and Supply. (06 ed.) (pp. 1-29). Glasgow: University of Strathclyde.