'Economic Geometry': Marshall's and Other Early Representations of Demand and Supply

Roy Grieve

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

Abstract

Does an apparent (minor) anomaly, said to occur not infrequently in elementary expositions of supply and demand theory, really imply – as seems to be suggested – that there is something a bit odd about Marshall’s diagrammatic handling of demand and supply? On investigation, we find some interesting differences of focus and exposition amongst the theorists who first developed the ‘geometric’ treatment of demand and supply, but find no reason, despite his differences from other marginalist pioneers such as Cournot, Dupuit and Walras, to consider Marshall’s treatment either as unconventional or forced, or as to regard him as the ‘odd man out’.
LanguageEnglish
Place of PublicationGlasgow
PublisherUniversity of Strathclyde
Pages1-29
Number of pages30
Volume08
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Economics
Geometry
Demand and supply
Pioneers
Anomaly
Cournot
Demand theory

Keywords

  • supply and demand
  • Marshallian economics
  • marshall

Cite this

Grieve, R. (2008). 'Economic Geometry': Marshall's and Other Early Representations of Demand and Supply. (06 ed.) (pp. 1-29). Glasgow: University of Strathclyde.
Grieve, Roy. / 'Economic Geometry' : Marshall's and Other Early Representations of Demand and Supply. 06. ed. Glasgow : University of Strathclyde, 2008. pp. 1-29
@techreport{61e394e479774402982ead11e132fcc1,
title = "'Economic Geometry': Marshall's and Other Early Representations of Demand and Supply",
abstract = "Does an apparent (minor) anomaly, said to occur not infrequently in elementary expositions of supply and demand theory, really imply – as seems to be suggested – that there is something a bit odd about Marshall’s diagrammatic handling of demand and supply? On investigation, we find some interesting differences of focus and exposition amongst the theorists who first developed the ‘geometric’ treatment of demand and supply, but find no reason, despite his differences from other marginalist pioneers such as Cournot, Dupuit and Walras, to consider Marshall’s treatment either as unconventional or forced, or as to regard him as the ‘odd man out’.",
keywords = "supply and demand, Marshallian economics, marshall",
author = "Roy Grieve",
note = "Discussion paper.",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
volume = "08",
pages = "1--29",
publisher = "University of Strathclyde",
edition = "06",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "University of Strathclyde",

}

Grieve, R 2008 ''Economic Geometry': Marshall's and Other Early Representations of Demand and Supply' 06 edn, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, pp. 1-29.

'Economic Geometry' : Marshall's and Other Early Representations of Demand and Supply. / Grieve, Roy.

06. ed. Glasgow : University of Strathclyde, 2008. p. 1-29.

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

TY - UNPB

T1 - 'Economic Geometry'

T2 - Marshall's and Other Early Representations of Demand and Supply

AU - Grieve, Roy

N1 - Discussion paper.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Does an apparent (minor) anomaly, said to occur not infrequently in elementary expositions of supply and demand theory, really imply – as seems to be suggested – that there is something a bit odd about Marshall’s diagrammatic handling of demand and supply? On investigation, we find some interesting differences of focus and exposition amongst the theorists who first developed the ‘geometric’ treatment of demand and supply, but find no reason, despite his differences from other marginalist pioneers such as Cournot, Dupuit and Walras, to consider Marshall’s treatment either as unconventional or forced, or as to regard him as the ‘odd man out’.

AB - Does an apparent (minor) anomaly, said to occur not infrequently in elementary expositions of supply and demand theory, really imply – as seems to be suggested – that there is something a bit odd about Marshall’s diagrammatic handling of demand and supply? On investigation, we find some interesting differences of focus and exposition amongst the theorists who first developed the ‘geometric’ treatment of demand and supply, but find no reason, despite his differences from other marginalist pioneers such as Cournot, Dupuit and Walras, to consider Marshall’s treatment either as unconventional or forced, or as to regard him as the ‘odd man out’.

KW - supply and demand

KW - Marshallian economics

KW - marshall

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 08

SP - 1

EP - 29

BT - 'Economic Geometry'

PB - University of Strathclyde

CY - Glasgow

ER -

Grieve R. 'Economic Geometry': Marshall's and Other Early Representations of Demand and Supply. 06 ed. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde. 2008, p. 1-29.