EBSD investigation of microstructure evolution during cryogenic rolling of type 321 metastable austenitic steel

Ainur Aletdinov, S. Mironov, G. Korznikova, Tatyana Konkova, Rida Zaripova, Michail Myshlyaev, S. Lee Semiatin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) was employed to establish microstructure evolution in type 321 metastable austenitic stainless steel during rolling at a near-liquid-nitrogen temperature. A particular emphasis was given to evaluation of microstructure-strength relationship.As expected, cryogenic rolling promoted strain-induced martensite transformation. The transformation was dominated by the γ→α′ sequence but clear evidence of the γ→ε→α′ transformation path was also found. The martensitic reactions were found to occur almost exclusively within deformation bands, i.e., the most-highly strained areas in the austenite. This prevented a progressive development of deformation-induced boundaries and thus suppressed the normal grain-subdivision process in this phase. On the other hand, the preferential nucleation of martensite within the deformation bands implied a close relationship between the transformation process and slip activity in parent austenite grains. Indeed, the martensite reactions were found to occur preferentially in austenite grains with crystallographic orientations close to Goss {110}<100> and Brass {110}<112>. Moreover, the martensitic transformations were governed by preferential variant selection which was most noticeable in ε-martensite. The sensitivity of the martensitic reactions to the crystallographic orientation of the austenite grains resulted in re-activation of the transformation process after development of a deformation-induced texture in the austenitic phase at high strains. Both martensitic phases were concluded to experience plastic strain which resulted in measurable changes in misorientation distributions. Cryogenic rolling imparted dramatic strengthening resulting in a more-than-sixfold increase in yield strength. The main source of hardening was the martensitic transformation with lesser contributions from dislocations and subboundary strengthening of the austenite.
LanguageEnglish
Pages460-473
Number of pages14
JournalMaterials Science and Engineering: A
Volume745
Early online date27 Dec 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Austenitic steel
austenite
Electron diffraction
Austenite
Cryogenics
cryogenics
martensite
Martensite
steels
microstructure
Microstructure
diffraction
Martensitic transformations
martensitic transformation
electrons
subdivisions
austenitic stainless steels
brasses
Brass
Liquid nitrogen

Keywords

  • electron microscopy
  • iron alloys
  • nanocrystalline materials
  • plasticity methods
  • grains and interfaces
  • phase transformation

Cite this

Aletdinov, Ainur ; Mironov, S. ; Korznikova, G. ; Konkova, Tatyana ; Zaripova, Rida ; Myshlyaev, Michail ; Lee Semiatin, S. / EBSD investigation of microstructure evolution during cryogenic rolling of type 321 metastable austenitic steel. In: Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2019 ; Vol. 745. pp. 460-473.
@article{fd251fc37bab423e9368a699e6053aa5,
title = "EBSD investigation of microstructure evolution during cryogenic rolling of type 321 metastable austenitic steel",
abstract = "Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) was employed to establish microstructure evolution in type 321 metastable austenitic stainless steel during rolling at a near-liquid-nitrogen temperature. A particular emphasis was given to evaluation of microstructure-strength relationship.As expected, cryogenic rolling promoted strain-induced martensite transformation. The transformation was dominated by the γ→α′ sequence but clear evidence of the γ→ε→α′ transformation path was also found. The martensitic reactions were found to occur almost exclusively within deformation bands, i.e., the most-highly strained areas in the austenite. This prevented a progressive development of deformation-induced boundaries and thus suppressed the normal grain-subdivision process in this phase. On the other hand, the preferential nucleation of martensite within the deformation bands implied a close relationship between the transformation process and slip activity in parent austenite grains. Indeed, the martensite reactions were found to occur preferentially in austenite grains with crystallographic orientations close to Goss {110}<100> and Brass {110}<112>. Moreover, the martensitic transformations were governed by preferential variant selection which was most noticeable in ε-martensite. The sensitivity of the martensitic reactions to the crystallographic orientation of the austenite grains resulted in re-activation of the transformation process after development of a deformation-induced texture in the austenitic phase at high strains. Both martensitic phases were concluded to experience plastic strain which resulted in measurable changes in misorientation distributions. Cryogenic rolling imparted dramatic strengthening resulting in a more-than-sixfold increase in yield strength. The main source of hardening was the martensitic transformation with lesser contributions from dislocations and subboundary strengthening of the austenite.",
keywords = "electron microscopy, iron alloys, nanocrystalline materials, plasticity methods, grains and interfaces, phase transformation",
author = "Ainur Aletdinov and S. Mironov and G. Korznikova and Tatyana Konkova and Rida Zaripova and Michail Myshlyaev and {Lee Semiatin}, S.",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.msea.2018.12.115",
language = "English",
volume = "745",
pages = "460--473",
journal = "Materials Science and Engineering: A",
issn = "0921-5093",

}

EBSD investigation of microstructure evolution during cryogenic rolling of type 321 metastable austenitic steel. / Aletdinov, Ainur; Mironov, S.; Korznikova, G.; Konkova, Tatyana; Zaripova, Rida; Myshlyaev, Michail; Lee Semiatin, S.

In: Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 745, 04.02.2019, p. 460-473.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - EBSD investigation of microstructure evolution during cryogenic rolling of type 321 metastable austenitic steel

AU - Aletdinov, Ainur

AU - Mironov, S.

AU - Korznikova, G.

AU - Konkova, Tatyana

AU - Zaripova, Rida

AU - Myshlyaev, Michail

AU - Lee Semiatin, S.

PY - 2019/2/4

Y1 - 2019/2/4

N2 - Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) was employed to establish microstructure evolution in type 321 metastable austenitic stainless steel during rolling at a near-liquid-nitrogen temperature. A particular emphasis was given to evaluation of microstructure-strength relationship.As expected, cryogenic rolling promoted strain-induced martensite transformation. The transformation was dominated by the γ→α′ sequence but clear evidence of the γ→ε→α′ transformation path was also found. The martensitic reactions were found to occur almost exclusively within deformation bands, i.e., the most-highly strained areas in the austenite. This prevented a progressive development of deformation-induced boundaries and thus suppressed the normal grain-subdivision process in this phase. On the other hand, the preferential nucleation of martensite within the deformation bands implied a close relationship between the transformation process and slip activity in parent austenite grains. Indeed, the martensite reactions were found to occur preferentially in austenite grains with crystallographic orientations close to Goss {110}<100> and Brass {110}<112>. Moreover, the martensitic transformations were governed by preferential variant selection which was most noticeable in ε-martensite. The sensitivity of the martensitic reactions to the crystallographic orientation of the austenite grains resulted in re-activation of the transformation process after development of a deformation-induced texture in the austenitic phase at high strains. Both martensitic phases were concluded to experience plastic strain which resulted in measurable changes in misorientation distributions. Cryogenic rolling imparted dramatic strengthening resulting in a more-than-sixfold increase in yield strength. The main source of hardening was the martensitic transformation with lesser contributions from dislocations and subboundary strengthening of the austenite.

AB - Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) was employed to establish microstructure evolution in type 321 metastable austenitic stainless steel during rolling at a near-liquid-nitrogen temperature. A particular emphasis was given to evaluation of microstructure-strength relationship.As expected, cryogenic rolling promoted strain-induced martensite transformation. The transformation was dominated by the γ→α′ sequence but clear evidence of the γ→ε→α′ transformation path was also found. The martensitic reactions were found to occur almost exclusively within deformation bands, i.e., the most-highly strained areas in the austenite. This prevented a progressive development of deformation-induced boundaries and thus suppressed the normal grain-subdivision process in this phase. On the other hand, the preferential nucleation of martensite within the deformation bands implied a close relationship between the transformation process and slip activity in parent austenite grains. Indeed, the martensite reactions were found to occur preferentially in austenite grains with crystallographic orientations close to Goss {110}<100> and Brass {110}<112>. Moreover, the martensitic transformations were governed by preferential variant selection which was most noticeable in ε-martensite. The sensitivity of the martensitic reactions to the crystallographic orientation of the austenite grains resulted in re-activation of the transformation process after development of a deformation-induced texture in the austenitic phase at high strains. Both martensitic phases were concluded to experience plastic strain which resulted in measurable changes in misorientation distributions. Cryogenic rolling imparted dramatic strengthening resulting in a more-than-sixfold increase in yield strength. The main source of hardening was the martensitic transformation with lesser contributions from dislocations and subboundary strengthening of the austenite.

KW - electron microscopy

KW - iron alloys

KW - nanocrystalline materials

KW - plasticity methods

KW - grains and interfaces

KW - phase transformation

U2 - 10.1016/j.msea.2018.12.115

DO - 10.1016/j.msea.2018.12.115

M3 - Article

VL - 745

SP - 460

EP - 473

JO - Materials Science and Engineering: A

T2 - Materials Science and Engineering: A

JF - Materials Science and Engineering: A

SN - 0921-5093

ER -