Ebola and the airplane - securing mobility through regime interactions and legal adaptation

Gearóid Ó Cuinn, Stephanie Switzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article concentrates on a particular controversy during the 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa; the mass cancellation of flights to and from affected countries. This occurred despite authoritative advice against such restrictions from the World Health Organization (WHO). During a public health emergency such as Ebola, the airplane sits at a site of regulatory uncertainty as it falls within the scope of two specialist and overlapping domains of international law; the WHO International Health Regulations (2005) and the Convention on International Civil Aviation. We explore how legal technicalities and objects, by promoting functional interactions between these two specialized regimes of law, were utilized to deal with this uncertainty. We show how the form and function of these mundane tools had a significant impact; assimilating aviation further into the system of global health security as well as instrumentalizing the aircraft as a tool of disease surveillance. This encounter of regimes was law creating, resulting in new international protocols and standards designed to enable the resumption of flights in and out of countries affected by outbreaks. This article therefore offers significant and original insights into the hidden work performed by legal techniques and tools in dealing with regime overlap. Our findings contribute to the wider international law literature on fragmentation and enrich our understanding of the significance of relational regime interactions in international law.

LanguageEnglish
Pages71-89
Number of pages19
JournalLeiden Journal of International Law
Volume32
Issue number1
Early online date23 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

aircraft
international law
regime
interaction
WHO
air traffic
flight
uncertainty
Law
West Africa
health
fragmentation
surveillance
public health
Disease
regulation

Keywords

  • Ebola
  • regime interactions
  • global health
  • ICAO
  • WHO
  • IHR

Cite this

@article{d83130bacadc4e59bbd447ce66675ab3,
title = "Ebola and the airplane - securing mobility through regime interactions and legal adaptation",
abstract = "This article concentrates on a particular controversy during the 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa; the mass cancellation of flights to and from affected countries. This occurred despite authoritative advice against such restrictions from the World Health Organization (WHO). During a public health emergency such as Ebola, the airplane sits at a site of regulatory uncertainty as it falls within the scope of two specialist and overlapping domains of international law; the WHO International Health Regulations (2005) and the Convention on International Civil Aviation. We explore how legal technicalities and objects, by promoting functional interactions between these two specialized regimes of law, were utilized to deal with this uncertainty. We show how the form and function of these mundane tools had a significant impact; assimilating aviation further into the system of global health security as well as instrumentalizing the aircraft as a tool of disease surveillance. This encounter of regimes was law creating, resulting in new international protocols and standards designed to enable the resumption of flights in and out of countries affected by outbreaks. This article therefore offers significant and original insights into the hidden work performed by legal techniques and tools in dealing with regime overlap. Our findings contribute to the wider international law literature on fragmentation and enrich our understanding of the significance of relational regime interactions in international law.",
keywords = "Ebola, regime interactions, global health, ICAO, WHO, IHR",
author = "{{\'O} Cuinn}, Gear{\'o}id and Stephanie Switzer",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0922156518000547",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "71--89",
journal = "Leiden Journal of International Law",
issn = "0922-1565",
number = "1",

}

Ebola and the airplane - securing mobility through regime interactions and legal adaptation. / Ó Cuinn, Gearóid ; Switzer, Stephanie.

In: Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 32, No. 1, 01.03.2019, p. 71-89.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ebola and the airplane - securing mobility through regime interactions and legal adaptation

AU - Ó Cuinn, Gearóid

AU - Switzer, Stephanie

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - This article concentrates on a particular controversy during the 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa; the mass cancellation of flights to and from affected countries. This occurred despite authoritative advice against such restrictions from the World Health Organization (WHO). During a public health emergency such as Ebola, the airplane sits at a site of regulatory uncertainty as it falls within the scope of two specialist and overlapping domains of international law; the WHO International Health Regulations (2005) and the Convention on International Civil Aviation. We explore how legal technicalities and objects, by promoting functional interactions between these two specialized regimes of law, were utilized to deal with this uncertainty. We show how the form and function of these mundane tools had a significant impact; assimilating aviation further into the system of global health security as well as instrumentalizing the aircraft as a tool of disease surveillance. This encounter of regimes was law creating, resulting in new international protocols and standards designed to enable the resumption of flights in and out of countries affected by outbreaks. This article therefore offers significant and original insights into the hidden work performed by legal techniques and tools in dealing with regime overlap. Our findings contribute to the wider international law literature on fragmentation and enrich our understanding of the significance of relational regime interactions in international law.

AB - This article concentrates on a particular controversy during the 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa; the mass cancellation of flights to and from affected countries. This occurred despite authoritative advice against such restrictions from the World Health Organization (WHO). During a public health emergency such as Ebola, the airplane sits at a site of regulatory uncertainty as it falls within the scope of two specialist and overlapping domains of international law; the WHO International Health Regulations (2005) and the Convention on International Civil Aviation. We explore how legal technicalities and objects, by promoting functional interactions between these two specialized regimes of law, were utilized to deal with this uncertainty. We show how the form and function of these mundane tools had a significant impact; assimilating aviation further into the system of global health security as well as instrumentalizing the aircraft as a tool of disease surveillance. This encounter of regimes was law creating, resulting in new international protocols and standards designed to enable the resumption of flights in and out of countries affected by outbreaks. This article therefore offers significant and original insights into the hidden work performed by legal techniques and tools in dealing with regime overlap. Our findings contribute to the wider international law literature on fragmentation and enrich our understanding of the significance of relational regime interactions in international law.

KW - Ebola

KW - regime interactions

KW - global health

KW - ICAO

KW - WHO

KW - IHR

U2 - 10.1017/S0922156518000547

DO - 10.1017/S0922156518000547

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 71

EP - 89

JO - Leiden Journal of International Law

T2 - Leiden Journal of International Law

JF - Leiden Journal of International Law

SN - 0922-1565

IS - 1

ER -