Early days: the European parliament, codecision and the European union legislative process post-Maastricht

D. Earnshaw, David Judge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)
221 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Since the European Parliament's first vote on a Council common position submitted under the co-decision procedure in January 1994 the practice of co-decision has been scrutinized carefully within Parliament and the other European Union (EU) institutions. However, such scrutiny has produced differing interpretations. This article seeks to assess these respective claims by analysing the first thirty-two legislative proposals processed under co-decision, and so to make an initial assessment of the legislative impact of the European Parliament under the new procedure.

Under co-decision Parliament is a more equal partner in the EU's legislative process, and now has a rightful place alongside Council in several important policy areas - despite the weighting of the procedure towards Council. Certainly, informal inter-institutional linkages have expanded as a result of co-decision and, whatever their qualitative effect, there has been an undeniable quantitative increase in the interactions between Parliament and Council.

The net result of the dialogue between Parliament and Council is the confirmation of an increasingly bipartite bargaining process and this, in turn, has placed the Commission in a considerably more ambiguous, and weaker, position than in the co-operation or consultation procedures.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)624-649
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of European Public Policy
Volume2
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1995

Fingerprint

European Parliament
parliament
first vote
policy area
weighting
EU
dialogue
interpretation
interaction

Keywords

  • maastricht
  • parliament
  • legislation
  • consultation
  • european politics
  • european parliament
  • european union

Cite this

@article{0e04368e867c4cf994f149e8b205b696,
title = "Early days: the European parliament, codecision and the European union legislative process post-Maastricht",
abstract = "Since the European Parliament's first vote on a Council common position submitted under the co-decision procedure in January 1994 the practice of co-decision has been scrutinized carefully within Parliament and the other European Union (EU) institutions. However, such scrutiny has produced differing interpretations. This article seeks to assess these respective claims by analysing the first thirty-two legislative proposals processed under co-decision, and so to make an initial assessment of the legislative impact of the European Parliament under the new procedure. Under co-decision Parliament is a more equal partner in the EU's legislative process, and now has a rightful place alongside Council in several important policy areas - despite the weighting of the procedure towards Council. Certainly, informal inter-institutional linkages have expanded as a result of co-decision and, whatever their qualitative effect, there has been an undeniable quantitative increase in the interactions between Parliament and Council. The net result of the dialogue between Parliament and Council is the confirmation of an increasingly bipartite bargaining process and this, in turn, has placed the Commission in a considerably more ambiguous, and weaker, position than in the co-operation or consultation procedures.",
keywords = "maastricht, parliament , legislation, consultation, european politics, european parliament, european union",
author = "D. Earnshaw and David Judge",
year = "1995",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1080/13501769508407010",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "624--649",
journal = "Journal of European Public Policy",
issn = "1350-1763",
number = "4",

}

Early days : the European parliament, codecision and the European union legislative process post-Maastricht. / Earnshaw, D.; Judge, David.

In: Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 2, No. 4, 12.1995, p. 624-649.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Early days

T2 - the European parliament, codecision and the European union legislative process post-Maastricht

AU - Earnshaw, D.

AU - Judge, David

PY - 1995/12

Y1 - 1995/12

N2 - Since the European Parliament's first vote on a Council common position submitted under the co-decision procedure in January 1994 the practice of co-decision has been scrutinized carefully within Parliament and the other European Union (EU) institutions. However, such scrutiny has produced differing interpretations. This article seeks to assess these respective claims by analysing the first thirty-two legislative proposals processed under co-decision, and so to make an initial assessment of the legislative impact of the European Parliament under the new procedure. Under co-decision Parliament is a more equal partner in the EU's legislative process, and now has a rightful place alongside Council in several important policy areas - despite the weighting of the procedure towards Council. Certainly, informal inter-institutional linkages have expanded as a result of co-decision and, whatever their qualitative effect, there has been an undeniable quantitative increase in the interactions between Parliament and Council. The net result of the dialogue between Parliament and Council is the confirmation of an increasingly bipartite bargaining process and this, in turn, has placed the Commission in a considerably more ambiguous, and weaker, position than in the co-operation or consultation procedures.

AB - Since the European Parliament's first vote on a Council common position submitted under the co-decision procedure in January 1994 the practice of co-decision has been scrutinized carefully within Parliament and the other European Union (EU) institutions. However, such scrutiny has produced differing interpretations. This article seeks to assess these respective claims by analysing the first thirty-two legislative proposals processed under co-decision, and so to make an initial assessment of the legislative impact of the European Parliament under the new procedure. Under co-decision Parliament is a more equal partner in the EU's legislative process, and now has a rightful place alongside Council in several important policy areas - despite the weighting of the procedure towards Council. Certainly, informal inter-institutional linkages have expanded as a result of co-decision and, whatever their qualitative effect, there has been an undeniable quantitative increase in the interactions between Parliament and Council. The net result of the dialogue between Parliament and Council is the confirmation of an increasingly bipartite bargaining process and this, in turn, has placed the Commission in a considerably more ambiguous, and weaker, position than in the co-operation or consultation procedures.

KW - maastricht

KW - parliament

KW - legislation

KW - consultation

KW - european politics

KW - european parliament

KW - european union

U2 - 10.1080/13501769508407010

DO - 10.1080/13501769508407010

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 624

EP - 649

JO - Journal of European Public Policy

JF - Journal of European Public Policy

SN - 1350-1763

IS - 4

ER -