Double layers are not particle accelerators

D. A. Bryant, R. Bingham, U. de Angelis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It it pointed out that the continuing advocacy of electrostatic double layers as particle accelerators in the aurora and other space and astrophysical plasmas is fundamentally unsound. It is suggested furthermore that there is little reason to invoke static or quasistatic electric fields as the cause of auroral electron acceleration. Stochastic acceleration by electrostatic wave turbulence appears to present a natural explanation for this and for electron acceleration in other space anfd astrophysical plasmas.
LanguageEnglish
Pages37-39
Number of pages3
JournalPhysical Review Letters
Volume68
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1992

Fingerprint

particle accelerators
electron acceleration
astrophysics
electrostatic waves
space plasmas
turbulence
electrostatics
electric fields
causes

Keywords

  • electrostatic double layers
  • particle acceleration
  • aurora
  • plasma
  • electric fields

Cite this

Bryant, D. A. ; Bingham, R. ; Angelis, U. de. / Double layers are not particle accelerators. In: Physical Review Letters. 1992 ; Vol. 68, No. 1. pp. 37-39.
@article{6b7427f08efc4fa09f68de378db1731a,
title = "Double layers are not particle accelerators",
abstract = "It it pointed out that the continuing advocacy of electrostatic double layers as particle accelerators in the aurora and other space and astrophysical plasmas is fundamentally unsound. It is suggested furthermore that there is little reason to invoke static or quasistatic electric fields as the cause of auroral electron acceleration. Stochastic acceleration by electrostatic wave turbulence appears to present a natural explanation for this and for electron acceleration in other space anfd astrophysical plasmas.",
keywords = "electrostatic double layers, particle acceleration, aurora, plasma, electric fields",
author = "Bryant, {D. A.} and R. Bingham and Angelis, {U. de}",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.37",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "37--39",
journal = "Physical Review Letters",
issn = "0031-9007",
number = "1",

}

Double layers are not particle accelerators. / Bryant, D. A.; Bingham, R.; Angelis, U. de.

In: Physical Review Letters, Vol. 68, No. 1, 1992, p. 37-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Double layers are not particle accelerators

AU - Bryant, D. A.

AU - Bingham, R.

AU - Angelis, U. de

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - It it pointed out that the continuing advocacy of electrostatic double layers as particle accelerators in the aurora and other space and astrophysical plasmas is fundamentally unsound. It is suggested furthermore that there is little reason to invoke static or quasistatic electric fields as the cause of auroral electron acceleration. Stochastic acceleration by electrostatic wave turbulence appears to present a natural explanation for this and for electron acceleration in other space anfd astrophysical plasmas.

AB - It it pointed out that the continuing advocacy of electrostatic double layers as particle accelerators in the aurora and other space and astrophysical plasmas is fundamentally unsound. It is suggested furthermore that there is little reason to invoke static or quasistatic electric fields as the cause of auroral electron acceleration. Stochastic acceleration by electrostatic wave turbulence appears to present a natural explanation for this and for electron acceleration in other space anfd astrophysical plasmas.

KW - electrostatic double layers

KW - particle acceleration

KW - aurora

KW - plasma

KW - electric fields

UR - http://journals.aps.org/prl/

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.37

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.37

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 37

EP - 39

JO - Physical Review Letters

T2 - Physical Review Letters

JF - Physical Review Letters

SN - 0031-9007

IS - 1

ER -