Donor political preferences and the allocation of aid: patterns in recipient type

Zachary Greene, Amanda Licht

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

159 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

National executives in Western democracies are not unilateral deciders: they lead parties with long-term policy priorities and manage challenging multi-party coalitions. Leaders of donor states use foreign aid to pursue their goals, including enacting policy output consistent with party ideology or bargaining the ability to control aid policy away to a coalition partner. Because coalition governments empower partisan actors with distinct preferences and preferences for international engagement condition the effect of left-right ideology, we predict left-pro-internationalist governments prefer aiding the neediest recipients while right-internationalists emphasize trade opportunities. In particular, we find that the party preferences of the minister directly responsible for foreign aid, the Development Minister, predicts aid allocations. Our analysis contributes to a theory of foreign policy change as the outcome of complex domestic bargaining and negotiations.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages27
JournalConflict Management and Peace Science
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 24 Jul 2023

Keywords

  • foreign aid allocation
  • domestic politics
  • political parties
  • coalition governance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Donor political preferences and the allocation of aid: patterns in recipient type'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this