Doing things collaboratively: realising the advantage or succumbing to inertia?

Chris Huxham, Siv Vangen, Janine O'Flynn (Editor), John Wanna (Editor)

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    There has been much rhetoric about the value of strategic alliances, industry networks, public service delivery partnerships and many other collaborative forms, but reports of unmitigated success are not common. In this article we explore the nature of the practice of collaboration, focusing in particular on some of the reasons why collaborative initiatives tend to challenge those involved. Two concepts are central to this exploration. The first is collaborative advantage. This captures the synergy argument: to gain real advantage from collaboration, something has to be achieved that could not have been achieved by any one of the organizations acting alone. This concept provides a useful 'guiding light' for the purpose of collaboration. The second concept, collaborative inertia, captures what happens very frequently in practice: the output from a collaborative arrangement is negligible, the rate of output is extremely slow, or stories of pain and hard grind are integral to successes achieved.
    LanguageEnglish
    Title of host publicationCollaborative Governance - A New Era of Public Policy in Australia?
    EditorsJanine O'Flynn, John Wanna
    Place of PublicationAustralia
    Pages29-44
    Number of pages16
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Fingerprint

    Inertia
    Synergy
    Pain
    Network industries
    Integral
    Public service delivery
    Strategic alliances
    Rhetoric

    Keywords

    • collaboration
    • strategic management
    • collaborative advantage
    • strategic alliances

    Cite this

    Huxham, C., Vangen, S., O'Flynn, J. (Ed.), & Wanna, J. (Ed.) (2009). Doing things collaboratively: realising the advantage or succumbing to inertia? In J. O'Flynn, & J. Wanna (Eds.), Collaborative Governance - A New Era of Public Policy in Australia? (pp. 29-44). Australia.
    Huxham, Chris ; Vangen, Siv ; O'Flynn, Janine (Editor) ; Wanna, John (Editor). / Doing things collaboratively : realising the advantage or succumbing to inertia?. Collaborative Governance - A New Era of Public Policy in Australia?. editor / Janine O'Flynn ; John Wanna. Australia, 2009. pp. 29-44
    @inbook{a711d609264e4db790a31224445294b2,
    title = "Doing things collaboratively: realising the advantage or succumbing to inertia?",
    abstract = "There has been much rhetoric about the value of strategic alliances, industry networks, public service delivery partnerships and many other collaborative forms, but reports of unmitigated success are not common. In this article we explore the nature of the practice of collaboration, focusing in particular on some of the reasons why collaborative initiatives tend to challenge those involved. Two concepts are central to this exploration. The first is collaborative advantage. This captures the synergy argument: to gain real advantage from collaboration, something has to be achieved that could not have been achieved by any one of the organizations acting alone. This concept provides a useful 'guiding light' for the purpose of collaboration. The second concept, collaborative inertia, captures what happens very frequently in practice: the output from a collaborative arrangement is negligible, the rate of output is extremely slow, or stories of pain and hard grind are integral to successes achieved.",
    keywords = "collaboration, strategic management, collaborative advantage, strategic alliances",
    author = "Chris Huxham and Siv Vangen and Janine O'Flynn and John Wanna",
    note = "Huxham, Chris and Vangen, Siv (2004). Doing Things Collaboratively: Realizing the advantage or succumbing to inertia? Organizational Dynamics, 33(2), pp. 190–201.",
    year = "2009",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "9781921536403",
    pages = "29--44",
    editor = "Janine O'Flynn and John Wanna",
    booktitle = "Collaborative Governance - A New Era of Public Policy in Australia?",

    }

    Huxham, C, Vangen, S, O'Flynn, J (ed.) & Wanna, J (ed.) 2009, Doing things collaboratively: realising the advantage or succumbing to inertia? in J O'Flynn & J Wanna (eds), Collaborative Governance - A New Era of Public Policy in Australia?. Australia, pp. 29-44.

    Doing things collaboratively : realising the advantage or succumbing to inertia? / Huxham, Chris; Vangen, Siv; O'Flynn, Janine (Editor); Wanna, John (Editor).

    Collaborative Governance - A New Era of Public Policy in Australia?. ed. / Janine O'Flynn; John Wanna. Australia, 2009. p. 29-44.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Doing things collaboratively

    T2 - realising the advantage or succumbing to inertia?

    AU - Huxham, Chris

    AU - Vangen, Siv

    A2 - O'Flynn, Janine

    A2 - Wanna, John

    A2 - O'Flynn, Janine

    A2 - Wanna, John

    N1 - Huxham, Chris and Vangen, Siv (2004). Doing Things Collaboratively: Realizing the advantage or succumbing to inertia? Organizational Dynamics, 33(2), pp. 190–201.

    PY - 2009

    Y1 - 2009

    N2 - There has been much rhetoric about the value of strategic alliances, industry networks, public service delivery partnerships and many other collaborative forms, but reports of unmitigated success are not common. In this article we explore the nature of the practice of collaboration, focusing in particular on some of the reasons why collaborative initiatives tend to challenge those involved. Two concepts are central to this exploration. The first is collaborative advantage. This captures the synergy argument: to gain real advantage from collaboration, something has to be achieved that could not have been achieved by any one of the organizations acting alone. This concept provides a useful 'guiding light' for the purpose of collaboration. The second concept, collaborative inertia, captures what happens very frequently in practice: the output from a collaborative arrangement is negligible, the rate of output is extremely slow, or stories of pain and hard grind are integral to successes achieved.

    AB - There has been much rhetoric about the value of strategic alliances, industry networks, public service delivery partnerships and many other collaborative forms, but reports of unmitigated success are not common. In this article we explore the nature of the practice of collaboration, focusing in particular on some of the reasons why collaborative initiatives tend to challenge those involved. Two concepts are central to this exploration. The first is collaborative advantage. This captures the synergy argument: to gain real advantage from collaboration, something has to be achieved that could not have been achieved by any one of the organizations acting alone. This concept provides a useful 'guiding light' for the purpose of collaboration. The second concept, collaborative inertia, captures what happens very frequently in practice: the output from a collaborative arrangement is negligible, the rate of output is extremely slow, or stories of pain and hard grind are integral to successes achieved.

    KW - collaboration

    KW - strategic management

    KW - collaborative advantage

    KW - strategic alliances

    UR - http://epress.anu.edu.au/collab_gov_citation.html

    UR - http://epress.anu.edu.au/anzsog/collab_gov/pdf/ch04.pdf

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 9781921536403

    SP - 29

    EP - 44

    BT - Collaborative Governance - A New Era of Public Policy in Australia?

    CY - Australia

    ER -

    Huxham C, Vangen S, O'Flynn J, (ed.), Wanna J, (ed.). Doing things collaboratively: realising the advantage or succumbing to inertia? In O'Flynn J, Wanna J, editors, Collaborative Governance - A New Era of Public Policy in Australia?. Australia. 2009. p. 29-44