'Doing' disagreement without being disagreeable: how students deal with conversational norms in group work

Research output: Contribution to conferenceSpeech

Abstract

The growing prevalence of group work in psychology places requirements on students to learn not only their subject matter, but also social and educational skills such as working with their peers. In problem-based learning (PBL), a crucial element is that students should challenge each other in terms of ideas or assumptions (Azer, 2004). Through disagreeing, it is argued that students will develop a more sophisticated understanding of the knowledge. Disagreements in conversation, however, have already been shown by conversation analytic work to be socially troublesome (Pomerantz, 1984), so it is vital that students learn to disagree‘ appropriately’ (Marra, 2012). The aim of this paper is to demonstrate how research in social psychology and discourse can provide empirical insights into how students might learn to interact more effectively in group-work settings. The paper reports on analyses from a project that aims to understand how engineering students develop the ‘soft skills’ of group work alongside their academic knowledge by examining the interactional practices and processes within PBL tutorials. In particular, we focus on how students ‘do’ disagreements in tutorial interaction. The data is taken from 30 hours of video-recorded data from PBL tutorials at a Scottish university. Using conversation analysis, we focus on sequences in which students disagree with one another, and illustrate the different ways in which this is achieved. The paper will discuss the interactional barriers to disagreeing with other students in group work and will offer insights from empirical data to illustrate how these might be overcome.

Conference

ConferenceEuropean Psychology Learning and Teaching Conference 2017
Abbreviated titleEUROPLAT 2017
CountryAustria
CitySalzburg
Period18/09/1720/09/17
Internet address

Fingerprint

Students
Problem-Based Learning
Social Psychology
Psychology
Research

Keywords

  • group work
  • problem-based learning
  • disagreement

Cite this

McQuade, R., Wiggins, S., & Ventura-Medina, E. (2017). 'Doing' disagreement without being disagreeable: how students deal with conversational norms in group work. European Psychology Learning and Teaching Conference 2017, Salzburg, Austria.
McQuade, Robert ; Wiggins, Sally ; Ventura-Medina, Esther. / 'Doing' disagreement without being disagreeable : how students deal with conversational norms in group work. European Psychology Learning and Teaching Conference 2017, Salzburg, Austria.
@conference{298a5b1d204c47f0b8fc517511862a99,
title = "'Doing' disagreement without being disagreeable: how students deal with conversational norms in group work",
abstract = "The growing prevalence of group work in psychology places requirements on students to learn not only their subject matter, but also social and educational skills such as working with their peers. In problem-based learning (PBL), a crucial element is that students should challenge each other in terms of ideas or assumptions (Azer, 2004). Through disagreeing, it is argued that students will develop a more sophisticated understanding of the knowledge. Disagreements in conversation, however, have already been shown by conversation analytic work to be socially troublesome (Pomerantz, 1984), so it is vital that students learn to disagree‘ appropriately’ (Marra, 2012). The aim of this paper is to demonstrate how research in social psychology and discourse can provide empirical insights into how students might learn to interact more effectively in group-work settings. The paper reports on analyses from a project that aims to understand how engineering students develop the ‘soft skills’ of group work alongside their academic knowledge by examining the interactional practices and processes within PBL tutorials. In particular, we focus on how students ‘do’ disagreements in tutorial interaction. The data is taken from 30 hours of video-recorded data from PBL tutorials at a Scottish university. Using conversation analysis, we focus on sequences in which students disagree with one another, and illustrate the different ways in which this is achieved. The paper will discuss the interactional barriers to disagreeing with other students in group work and will offer insights from empirical data to illustrate how these might be overcome.",
keywords = "group work, problem-based learning, disagreement",
author = "Robert McQuade and Sally Wiggins and Esther Ventura-Medina",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "18",
language = "English",
note = "European Psychology Learning and Teaching Conference 2017 : Evidence-based Improvement for Learning and Teaching Psychology, EUROPLAT 2017 ; Conference date: 18-09-2017 Through 20-09-2017",
url = "http://www.europlat.sbg.ac.at/",

}

McQuade, R, Wiggins, S & Ventura-Medina, E 2017, ''Doing' disagreement without being disagreeable: how students deal with conversational norms in group work' European Psychology Learning and Teaching Conference 2017, Salzburg, Austria, 18/09/17 - 20/09/17, .

'Doing' disagreement without being disagreeable : how students deal with conversational norms in group work. / McQuade, Robert; Wiggins, Sally; Ventura-Medina, Esther.

2017. European Psychology Learning and Teaching Conference 2017, Salzburg, Austria.

Research output: Contribution to conferenceSpeech

TY - CONF

T1 - 'Doing' disagreement without being disagreeable

T2 - how students deal with conversational norms in group work

AU - McQuade, Robert

AU - Wiggins, Sally

AU - Ventura-Medina, Esther

PY - 2017/9/18

Y1 - 2017/9/18

N2 - The growing prevalence of group work in psychology places requirements on students to learn not only their subject matter, but also social and educational skills such as working with their peers. In problem-based learning (PBL), a crucial element is that students should challenge each other in terms of ideas or assumptions (Azer, 2004). Through disagreeing, it is argued that students will develop a more sophisticated understanding of the knowledge. Disagreements in conversation, however, have already been shown by conversation analytic work to be socially troublesome (Pomerantz, 1984), so it is vital that students learn to disagree‘ appropriately’ (Marra, 2012). The aim of this paper is to demonstrate how research in social psychology and discourse can provide empirical insights into how students might learn to interact more effectively in group-work settings. The paper reports on analyses from a project that aims to understand how engineering students develop the ‘soft skills’ of group work alongside their academic knowledge by examining the interactional practices and processes within PBL tutorials. In particular, we focus on how students ‘do’ disagreements in tutorial interaction. The data is taken from 30 hours of video-recorded data from PBL tutorials at a Scottish university. Using conversation analysis, we focus on sequences in which students disagree with one another, and illustrate the different ways in which this is achieved. The paper will discuss the interactional barriers to disagreeing with other students in group work and will offer insights from empirical data to illustrate how these might be overcome.

AB - The growing prevalence of group work in psychology places requirements on students to learn not only their subject matter, but also social and educational skills such as working with their peers. In problem-based learning (PBL), a crucial element is that students should challenge each other in terms of ideas or assumptions (Azer, 2004). Through disagreeing, it is argued that students will develop a more sophisticated understanding of the knowledge. Disagreements in conversation, however, have already been shown by conversation analytic work to be socially troublesome (Pomerantz, 1984), so it is vital that students learn to disagree‘ appropriately’ (Marra, 2012). The aim of this paper is to demonstrate how research in social psychology and discourse can provide empirical insights into how students might learn to interact more effectively in group-work settings. The paper reports on analyses from a project that aims to understand how engineering students develop the ‘soft skills’ of group work alongside their academic knowledge by examining the interactional practices and processes within PBL tutorials. In particular, we focus on how students ‘do’ disagreements in tutorial interaction. The data is taken from 30 hours of video-recorded data from PBL tutorials at a Scottish university. Using conversation analysis, we focus on sequences in which students disagree with one another, and illustrate the different ways in which this is achieved. The paper will discuss the interactional barriers to disagreeing with other students in group work and will offer insights from empirical data to illustrate how these might be overcome.

KW - group work

KW - problem-based learning

KW - disagreement

UR - http://www.europlat.sbg.ac.at/index.html

UR - http://www.europlat.sbg.ac.at/images/programbook.pdf

M3 - Speech

ER -

McQuade R, Wiggins S, Ventura-Medina E. 'Doing' disagreement without being disagreeable: how students deal with conversational norms in group work. 2017. European Psychology Learning and Teaching Conference 2017, Salzburg, Austria.