Abstract
On 9 March 2021, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) added two judgments to a long line of case law interpreting the meaning of "working time" under art. 2 of Directive 2003/88/EC (the"“Working Time Directive"). Art. 2 defines "working time" as any period during which the worker is working, at the employer's disposal and carrying out his activity or duties. The opposite to working time is a "rest period", defined in art. 2 as any period which is not working time. The two are mutually exclusive. There is a plethora of case law examining the scope of "working time", particularly in the context of on-call work.[1] The CJEU has generally adopted a progressive approach to the Directive, widening its scope through a broad interpretation of what counts as "working time", and bestowing the rights contained within the Directive with a fundamental character.[2] In DJ v Radiotelevizija Slovenija[3] and RJ v Stadt Offenbach am Main[4] the CJEU was asked to consider whether and how stand-by time spent at home falls within the scope of art. 2.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 121-124 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | European Papers |
Volume | 6 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 22 Apr 2021 |
Keywords
- working time
- stand by time
- working hours