Does size matter for Six Sigma implementation? Findings from the survey in UK SMEs

Maneesh Kumar, J. Antony, A. Douglas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to identify the quality initiatives implemented in UK manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and to perform a comparative analysis of quality management practices within Six Sigma firms against the non-Six Sigma manufacturing SMEs. To achieve the research objective, a survey-based approach is adopted by designing a short questionnaire addressing the issues of quality practices in SMEs. The paper encompasses the survey results from the first phase of Doctoral study to identify Six Sigma and non-Six Sigma companies. The response rate from the survey is 12.7 per cent out of 500 companies identified through the use of random sampling technique within the FAME and Dun & Bradstreet database of manufacturing SMEs. Data analysis was carried out using SPSS and Microsoft Excel. The findings from the study reveal that there is a significant difference in the performance of the Six Sigma/Lean firms against ISO certified companies. However, it is interesting to reflect on the findings of critical success factors (CSFs) of the sample firms. There is no significant difference in the perceived importance of the identified CSFs' variables in the Six Sigma and ISO certified SMEs. The focus of the study is only on UK manufacturing SMEs encompassing 64 firms. The small sample size and focus on manufacturing sector limits its generalisability to the entire SME population. Future study should focus on performing a comparative study of manufacturing and service based SMEs in UK or Europe. The novelty of the paper lies in conducting a comparative study on the performance of Six Sigma and non-Six Sigma UK SMEs and drawing out valuable lessons for academics, consultants, researchers and practitioners of continuous improvement initiatives like Lean and Six Sigma.
LanguageEnglish
Pages623-635
Number of pages12
JournalTQM Journal
Volume21
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Six Sigma
Small and medium-sized enterprises
Manufacturing
Comparative study
Critical success factors
Encompassing
Quality management practices
Consultants
Manufacturing sector
Lean Six Sigma
Response rate
Data base
Random sampling
Sample size
Continuous improvement
Comparative analysis
Microsoft
Novelty
Small sample
Questionnaire

Keywords

  • continuous improvement
  • critical success factors
  • performance measures
  • six sigma
  • medium-sized enterprises

Cite this

Kumar, Maneesh ; Antony, J. ; Douglas, A. / Does size matter for Six Sigma implementation? Findings from the survey in UK SMEs. In: TQM Journal. 2009 ; Vol. 21, No. 6. pp. 623-635.
@article{a4a8f8f6664a4522842eec3dc5eec0ae,
title = "Does size matter for Six Sigma implementation? Findings from the survey in UK SMEs",
abstract = "The purpose of this paper is to identify the quality initiatives implemented in UK manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and to perform a comparative analysis of quality management practices within Six Sigma firms against the non-Six Sigma manufacturing SMEs. To achieve the research objective, a survey-based approach is adopted by designing a short questionnaire addressing the issues of quality practices in SMEs. The paper encompasses the survey results from the first phase of Doctoral study to identify Six Sigma and non-Six Sigma companies. The response rate from the survey is 12.7 per cent out of 500 companies identified through the use of random sampling technique within the FAME and Dun & Bradstreet database of manufacturing SMEs. Data analysis was carried out using SPSS and Microsoft Excel. The findings from the study reveal that there is a significant difference in the performance of the Six Sigma/Lean firms against ISO certified companies. However, it is interesting to reflect on the findings of critical success factors (CSFs) of the sample firms. There is no significant difference in the perceived importance of the identified CSFs' variables in the Six Sigma and ISO certified SMEs. The focus of the study is only on UK manufacturing SMEs encompassing 64 firms. The small sample size and focus on manufacturing sector limits its generalisability to the entire SME population. Future study should focus on performing a comparative study of manufacturing and service based SMEs in UK or Europe. The novelty of the paper lies in conducting a comparative study on the performance of Six Sigma and non-Six Sigma UK SMEs and drawing out valuable lessons for academics, consultants, researchers and practitioners of continuous improvement initiatives like Lean and Six Sigma.",
keywords = "continuous improvement, critical success factors, performance measures, six sigma, medium-sized enterprises",
author = "Maneesh Kumar and J. Antony and A. Douglas",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1108/17542730910995882",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "623--635",
journal = "TQM Journal",
issn = "1754-2731",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "6",

}

Does size matter for Six Sigma implementation? Findings from the survey in UK SMEs. / Kumar, Maneesh; Antony, J.; Douglas, A.

In: TQM Journal, Vol. 21, No. 6, 2009, p. 623-635.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does size matter for Six Sigma implementation? Findings from the survey in UK SMEs

AU - Kumar, Maneesh

AU - Antony, J.

AU - Douglas, A.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The purpose of this paper is to identify the quality initiatives implemented in UK manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and to perform a comparative analysis of quality management practices within Six Sigma firms against the non-Six Sigma manufacturing SMEs. To achieve the research objective, a survey-based approach is adopted by designing a short questionnaire addressing the issues of quality practices in SMEs. The paper encompasses the survey results from the first phase of Doctoral study to identify Six Sigma and non-Six Sigma companies. The response rate from the survey is 12.7 per cent out of 500 companies identified through the use of random sampling technique within the FAME and Dun & Bradstreet database of manufacturing SMEs. Data analysis was carried out using SPSS and Microsoft Excel. The findings from the study reveal that there is a significant difference in the performance of the Six Sigma/Lean firms against ISO certified companies. However, it is interesting to reflect on the findings of critical success factors (CSFs) of the sample firms. There is no significant difference in the perceived importance of the identified CSFs' variables in the Six Sigma and ISO certified SMEs. The focus of the study is only on UK manufacturing SMEs encompassing 64 firms. The small sample size and focus on manufacturing sector limits its generalisability to the entire SME population. Future study should focus on performing a comparative study of manufacturing and service based SMEs in UK or Europe. The novelty of the paper lies in conducting a comparative study on the performance of Six Sigma and non-Six Sigma UK SMEs and drawing out valuable lessons for academics, consultants, researchers and practitioners of continuous improvement initiatives like Lean and Six Sigma.

AB - The purpose of this paper is to identify the quality initiatives implemented in UK manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and to perform a comparative analysis of quality management practices within Six Sigma firms against the non-Six Sigma manufacturing SMEs. To achieve the research objective, a survey-based approach is adopted by designing a short questionnaire addressing the issues of quality practices in SMEs. The paper encompasses the survey results from the first phase of Doctoral study to identify Six Sigma and non-Six Sigma companies. The response rate from the survey is 12.7 per cent out of 500 companies identified through the use of random sampling technique within the FAME and Dun & Bradstreet database of manufacturing SMEs. Data analysis was carried out using SPSS and Microsoft Excel. The findings from the study reveal that there is a significant difference in the performance of the Six Sigma/Lean firms against ISO certified companies. However, it is interesting to reflect on the findings of critical success factors (CSFs) of the sample firms. There is no significant difference in the perceived importance of the identified CSFs' variables in the Six Sigma and ISO certified SMEs. The focus of the study is only on UK manufacturing SMEs encompassing 64 firms. The small sample size and focus on manufacturing sector limits its generalisability to the entire SME population. Future study should focus on performing a comparative study of manufacturing and service based SMEs in UK or Europe. The novelty of the paper lies in conducting a comparative study on the performance of Six Sigma and non-Six Sigma UK SMEs and drawing out valuable lessons for academics, consultants, researchers and practitioners of continuous improvement initiatives like Lean and Six Sigma.

KW - continuous improvement

KW - critical success factors

KW - performance measures

KW - six sigma

KW - medium-sized enterprises

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17542730910995882

U2 - 10.1108/17542730910995882

DO - 10.1108/17542730910995882

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 623

EP - 635

JO - TQM Journal

T2 - TQM Journal

JF - TQM Journal

SN - 1754-2731

IS - 6

ER -