Does Public Governance Always Matter? How Experience of Poor Institutional Quality Influences FDI to the South*

Julia Darby, Rodolphe Desbordes, Ian Wooton

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper investigates whether the higher prevalence of South multinational enterprises (MNEs) in risky developing countries may be explained by the experience that they have acquired of poor institutional quality at home. We confirm the intuition provided by our analytical model by empirically showing that the positive impact of good public governance on foreign direct investment (FDI) in a given host country is moderated significantly, and even in some cases eliminated, when MNEs have been faced with poor institutional quality at home.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationGlasgow
PublisherUniversity of Strathclyde
Pages1-39
Number of pages41
Volume10
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2010

Fingerprint

Public governance
Institutional quality
Multinational enterprises
Foreign direct investment
Analytical model
Developing countries
Host country
Intuition

Keywords

  • south-south fdi
  • public governance
  • institutions

Cite this

@techreport{ad759bec684348c68445840c1a49df5b,
title = "Does Public Governance Always Matter? How Experience of Poor Institutional Quality Influences FDI to the South*",
abstract = "This paper investigates whether the higher prevalence of South multinational enterprises (MNEs) in risky developing countries may be explained by the experience that they have acquired of poor institutional quality at home. We confirm the intuition provided by our analytical model by empirically showing that the positive impact of good public governance on foreign direct investment (FDI) in a given host country is moderated significantly, and even in some cases eliminated, when MNEs have been faced with poor institutional quality at home.",
keywords = "south-south fdi, public governance, institutions",
author = "Julia Darby and Rodolphe Desbordes and Ian Wooton",
note = "Published as a paper within the Discussion Papers in Economics, No. 10-03 (2010). Versions of this paper have been presented at the CESifo Area Conference on the Global Economy, 2010, the Econometric Society World Congress 2010 in Shanghai and at seminars at the University of Sheffield and the University of York.",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "1--39",
publisher = "University of Strathclyde",
edition = "03",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "University of Strathclyde",

}

Does Public Governance Always Matter? How Experience of Poor Institutional Quality Influences FDI to the South*. / Darby, Julia; Desbordes, Rodolphe; Wooton, Ian.

03. ed. Glasgow : University of Strathclyde, 2010. p. 1-39.

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

TY - UNPB

T1 - Does Public Governance Always Matter? How Experience of Poor Institutional Quality Influences FDI to the South*

AU - Darby, Julia

AU - Desbordes, Rodolphe

AU - Wooton, Ian

N1 - Published as a paper within the Discussion Papers in Economics, No. 10-03 (2010). Versions of this paper have been presented at the CESifo Area Conference on the Global Economy, 2010, the Econometric Society World Congress 2010 in Shanghai and at seminars at the University of Sheffield and the University of York.

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - This paper investigates whether the higher prevalence of South multinational enterprises (MNEs) in risky developing countries may be explained by the experience that they have acquired of poor institutional quality at home. We confirm the intuition provided by our analytical model by empirically showing that the positive impact of good public governance on foreign direct investment (FDI) in a given host country is moderated significantly, and even in some cases eliminated, when MNEs have been faced with poor institutional quality at home.

AB - This paper investigates whether the higher prevalence of South multinational enterprises (MNEs) in risky developing countries may be explained by the experience that they have acquired of poor institutional quality at home. We confirm the intuition provided by our analytical model by empirically showing that the positive impact of good public governance on foreign direct investment (FDI) in a given host country is moderated significantly, and even in some cases eliminated, when MNEs have been faced with poor institutional quality at home.

KW - south-south fdi

KW - public governance

KW - institutions

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 10

SP - 1

EP - 39

BT - Does Public Governance Always Matter? How Experience of Poor Institutional Quality Influences FDI to the South*

PB - University of Strathclyde

CY - Glasgow

ER -