Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Does prehabilitation modify muscle mass in patients with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant therapy? A subanalysis from the REx randomised controlled trial

  • S. J. Moug
  • , S. J.E. Barry
  • , S. Maguire
  • , N. Johns
  • , D. Dolan
  • , R. J. C. Steele
  • , C. Buchan
  • , G. Mackay
  • , A. S. Anderson
  • , N. Mutrie

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

19 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background Patients with rectal cancer who present with sarcopenia (low muscle mass) are at significantly greater risk of postoperative complications and reduction in disease-free survival. We performed a subanalysis of a randomised controlled study [the REx trial; www.isrctn.com; 62859294] to assess the potential of prehabilitation to modify muscle mass in patients having neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT).
Methods Patients scheduled for NACRT, then potentially curative surgery (August 2014–March 2016) had baseline physi- cal assessment and psoas muscle mass measurement (total psoas index using computed tomography-based measurements). Participants were randomised to either the intervention (13–17-week telephone-guided graduated walking programme) or control group (standard care). Follow-up testing was performed 1–2 weeks before surgery.
Results The 44 patients had a mean age of 66.8 years (SD 9.6) and were male (64%); white (98%); American Society of Anesthesiologists class 2 (66%); co-morbid (58%); overweight (72%) (body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2). At baseline, 14% were sarcopenic. At follow-up, 13 (65%) of patients in the prehabilitation group had increased muscle mass versus 7 (35%) that experienced a decrease. Conversely, 16 (67%) controls experienced a decrease in muscle mass and 8 (33%) showed an increase. An adjusted linear regression model estimated a mean treatment difference in Total Psoas Index of 40.2mm2/m2 (95% CI − 3.4 to 83.7) between groups in change from baseline (p = 0.07).
Conclusions Prehabilitation improved muscle mass in patients with rectal cancer who had NACRT. These results need to be explored in a larger trial to determine if the poorer short- and long-term patient outcomes associated with low muscle mass can be minimised by prehabilitation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)959-964
Number of pages6
JournalTechniques in Coloproctology
Volume24
Issue number9
Early online date20 Jun 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Sept 2020

Keywords

  • prehabilitation
  • muscle wasting
  • rectal cancer
  • sarcopenia
  • neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
  • neoadjuvant therapy
  • rectal neoplasms
  • preoperative care
  • walking

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does prehabilitation modify muscle mass in patients with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant therapy? A subanalysis from the REx randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this