Does inversion abolish the left chimeric face processing advantage?

S.H. Butler, M. Harvey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Experiments using chimeric stimuli have shown that the right hemisphere is more influential in processing facial information. Here, again, we found clear evidence that study participants used the information from the left side of the face to inform their gender decisions when chimeric male/female, female/male stimuli were presented. Most interestingly though, this effect was not only present for upright faces but also for inverted (flipped) faces (although the effect was significantly reduced). We propose that the chimeric bias effects found here argue against the idea that inversion destroys the right hemisphere superiority for faces. If this was indeed the case, flipping the chimeric faces should have resulted in a loss of the left face bias. This was not the case.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1991-1993
Number of pages2
JournalNeuroReport
Volume16
Issue number18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Automatic Data Processing

Keywords

  • inversion
  • chimeric face processing
  • gender decisions
  • chimeric bias effects
  • psychology

Cite this

Butler, S.H. ; Harvey, M. / Does inversion abolish the left chimeric face processing advantage?. In: NeuroReport. 2005 ; Vol. 16, No. 18. pp. 1991-1993.
@article{33ff79f24746414cbca6f5410be7b698,
title = "Does inversion abolish the left chimeric face processing advantage?",
abstract = "Experiments using chimeric stimuli have shown that the right hemisphere is more influential in processing facial information. Here, again, we found clear evidence that study participants used the information from the left side of the face to inform their gender decisions when chimeric male/female, female/male stimuli were presented. Most interestingly though, this effect was not only present for upright faces but also for inverted (flipped) faces (although the effect was significantly reduced). We propose that the chimeric bias effects found here argue against the idea that inversion destroys the right hemisphere superiority for faces. If this was indeed the case, flipping the chimeric faces should have resulted in a loss of the left face bias. This was not the case.",
keywords = "inversion, chimeric face processing, gender decisions, chimeric bias effects, psychology",
author = "S.H. Butler and M. Harvey",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1097/00001756-200512190-00004",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "1991--1993",
journal = "NeuroReport",
issn = "0959-4965",
number = "18",

}

Does inversion abolish the left chimeric face processing advantage? / Butler, S.H.; Harvey, M.

In: NeuroReport, Vol. 16, No. 18, 2005, p. 1991-1993.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does inversion abolish the left chimeric face processing advantage?

AU - Butler, S.H.

AU - Harvey, M.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Experiments using chimeric stimuli have shown that the right hemisphere is more influential in processing facial information. Here, again, we found clear evidence that study participants used the information from the left side of the face to inform their gender decisions when chimeric male/female, female/male stimuli were presented. Most interestingly though, this effect was not only present for upright faces but also for inverted (flipped) faces (although the effect was significantly reduced). We propose that the chimeric bias effects found here argue against the idea that inversion destroys the right hemisphere superiority for faces. If this was indeed the case, flipping the chimeric faces should have resulted in a loss of the left face bias. This was not the case.

AB - Experiments using chimeric stimuli have shown that the right hemisphere is more influential in processing facial information. Here, again, we found clear evidence that study participants used the information from the left side of the face to inform their gender decisions when chimeric male/female, female/male stimuli were presented. Most interestingly though, this effect was not only present for upright faces but also for inverted (flipped) faces (although the effect was significantly reduced). We propose that the chimeric bias effects found here argue against the idea that inversion destroys the right hemisphere superiority for faces. If this was indeed the case, flipping the chimeric faces should have resulted in a loss of the left face bias. This was not the case.

KW - inversion

KW - chimeric face processing

KW - gender decisions

KW - chimeric bias effects

KW - psychology

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200512190-00004

U2 - 10.1097/00001756-200512190-00004

DO - 10.1097/00001756-200512190-00004

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 1991

EP - 1993

JO - NeuroReport

T2 - NeuroReport

JF - NeuroReport

SN - 0959-4965

IS - 18

ER -