Does Intuiting Precede or Follow Mastery?

Viktor Dörfler, Alina Bas, Marta Sinclair

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Abstract

Grandmasters, i.e. professionals at the top of their respective fields in terms of expertise are often described as “intuitive”. This appears to be the case across domains as varied as physics, management, and haute cuisine. In scholarly literature, the process of intuiting is often positioned as a factor of, rather than a precursor to mastery. However, we suggest that intuiting and mastery represent a classic ‘the chicken or the egg’ dilemma: While reliable intuiting can only be found at the highest levels of mastery, these levels of mastery seem unachievable without reliable intuiting. Using literature on expertise as a base, this chapter introduces the Markers of Mastery (MM) scale that includes intuiting as a critical marker of mastery and demonstrates that intuiting becomes more frequent and reliable with increased mastery. Positioning intuiting as sensing + sensemaking explains reasons for this phenomenon and contributes to resolving ‘the chicken or the egg’ dilemma. Capturing intuiting on the MM scale also allows for early talent recognition, assessment of one’s current level of mastery, and identification of one’s developmental needs.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance
EditorsA Mark Williams, Franzis Preckel, Robert R Hoffman
Volume3
Edition3rd
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 4 Oct 2024

Publication series

NameCambridge Handbooks in Psychology
PublisherCambridge University Press

Keywords

  • mastery
  • expertise
  • grandmaster
  • apprentice
  • apprenticeship
  • intuition
  • intuiting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does Intuiting Precede or Follow Mastery?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this